Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways

2017-06-20 Thread Russell Bryant
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > I'm working on the implementation changes related to the schema [1] > > And I thought it could be great if we discussed here over the cmdline > changes, so this effort could happen in parallel: > > ovn-nbctl

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways

2017-06-20 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
I'm working on the implementation changes related to the schema [1] And I thought it could be great if we discussed here over the cmdline changes, so this effort could happen in parallel: ovn-nbctl lrp-add-gw-chassis [priority] ovn-nbctl lrp-set-gw-chassis-prio priority ovn-nbctl

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways

2017-06-14 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
As discussed on IRC let's meet tomorrow at 9am EST to talk about the topic on IRC. El 14 jun. 2017 9:02 p. m., "Russell Bryant" escribió: On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > Hi, sorry, I didn't see your comments this

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways

2017-06-14 Thread Russell Bryant
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > Hi, sorry, I didn't see your comments this morning. Thanks a lot for all the > feedback, I'll shuffle things around. > > I thought about something like adding new columns too, but I didn't manage > to come up

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways

2017-06-14 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
Hi, sorry, I didn't see your comments this morning. Thanks a lot for all the feedback, I'll shuffle things around. I thought about something like adding new columns too, but I didn't manage to come up with anything that didn't make it less intuitive. The disadvantage of the current format is

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways

2017-06-13 Thread Russell Bryant
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:31 AM, wrote: >> From: Miguel Angel Ajo >> >> This patch handles multiple gateways with priorities in chassisredirect >> ports, any gateway with a

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways

2017-06-13 Thread Russell Bryant
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:31 AM, wrote: > From: Miguel Angel Ajo > > This patch handles multiple gateways with priorities in chassisredirect > ports, any gateway with a chassis redirect port will implement the > rules to de-encapsulate incomming packets

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways

2017-06-06 Thread Liran Schour
vs. L3 balancing. Am I clearer now? - Liran From: Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo <majop...@redhat.com> To: Liran Schour <lir...@il.ibm.com> Cc: ovs dev <d...@openvswitch.org> Date: 06/06/2017 12:34 PM Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways

2017-06-06 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
Hi Liran, For now we're focusing on Active/Backup implementation, A very brief introduction to the active/active problem can be found here [1]. I'm not an expert on this area and I haven't investigated yet. I'd guess we could have several options, like: * handling it at L3 level (ECMP), Or *

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways

2017-06-05 Thread Liran Schour
ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org wrote on 02/06/2017 03:31:41 PM: > From: Miguel Angel Ajo > > This patch handles multiple gateways with priorities in chassisredirect > ports, any gateway with a chassis redirect port will implement the > rules to de-encapsulate incomming

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of multiple gateways

2017-06-02 Thread majopela
From: Miguel Angel Ajo This patch handles multiple gateways with priorities in chassisredirect ports, any gateway with a chassis redirect port will implement the rules to de-encapsulate incomming packets for such port. And hosts targetting a remote chassisredirect port will