On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
wrote:
> I'm working on the implementation changes related to the schema [1]
>
> And I thought it could be great if we discussed here over the cmdline
> changes, so this effort could happen in parallel:
>
> ovn-nbctl
I'm working on the implementation changes related to the schema [1]
And I thought it could be great if we discussed here over the cmdline
changes, so this effort could happen in parallel:
ovn-nbctl lrp-add-gw-chassis [priority]
ovn-nbctl lrp-set-gw-chassis-prio priority
ovn-nbctl
As discussed on IRC let's meet tomorrow at 9am EST to talk about the topic
on IRC.
El 14 jun. 2017 9:02 p. m., "Russell Bryant" escribió:
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
wrote:
> Hi, sorry, I didn't see your comments this
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
wrote:
> Hi, sorry, I didn't see your comments this morning. Thanks a lot for all the
> feedback, I'll shuffle things around.
>
> I thought about something like adding new columns too, but I didn't manage
> to come up
Hi, sorry, I didn't see your comments this morning. Thanks a lot for all
the feedback, I'll shuffle things around.
I thought about something like adding new columns too, but I didn't manage
to come up with anything that didn't make it less intuitive.
The disadvantage of the current format is
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:31 AM, wrote:
>> From: Miguel Angel Ajo
>>
>> This patch handles multiple gateways with priorities in chassisredirect
>> ports, any gateway with a
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:31 AM, wrote:
> From: Miguel Angel Ajo
>
> This patch handles multiple gateways with priorities in chassisredirect
> ports, any gateway with a chassis redirect port will implement the
> rules to de-encapsulate incomming packets
vs. L3 balancing.
Am I clearer now?
- Liran
From: Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo <majop...@redhat.com>
To: Liran Schour <lir...@il.ibm.com>
Cc: ovs dev <d...@openvswitch.org>
Date: 06/06/2017 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1 1/4] ovn: l3ha, handling of
Hi Liran,
For now we're focusing on Active/Backup implementation,
A very brief introduction to the active/active problem can be found
here [1].
I'm not an expert on this area and I haven't investigated yet.
I'd guess we could have several options, like:
* handling it at L3 level (ECMP),
Or
*
ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org wrote on 02/06/2017 03:31:41 PM:
> From: Miguel Angel Ajo
>
> This patch handles multiple gateways with priorities in chassisredirect
> ports, any gateway with a chassis redirect port will implement the
> rules to de-encapsulate incomming
From: Miguel Angel Ajo
This patch handles multiple gateways with priorities in chassisredirect
ports, any gateway with a chassis redirect port will implement the
rules to de-encapsulate incomming packets for such port.
And hosts targetting a remote chassisredirect port will
11 matches
Mail list logo