> > Hi Matteo,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch. But I fail to understand why there is a memory leak.
> > In fact when I tested in my setup, the test ran without any leak.
>
> The main part is:
> '_REFILL_' loop removes packets from the original batch and
> dp_execute_output_action()
> doesn't free the
Hi Matteo,
Thanks for the patch. But I fail to understand why there is a memory leak.
In fact when I tested in my setup, the test ran without any leak.
The functions dp_execute_lb_output_action and dp_execute_output_action, both
return 'false' if current batch is non-empty.
case OVS_ACTION_AT
On 4/6/20 3:03 PM, Vishal Deep Ajmera wrote:
> Hi Matteo,
>
> Thanks for the patch. But I fail to understand why there is a memory leak.
> In fact when I tested in my setup, the test ran without any leak.
The main part is:
'_REFILL_' loop removes packets from the original batch and
dp_execute_o
On 3/31/20 12:28 PM, Matteo Croce wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 3:26 PM Vishal Deep Ajmera
> wrote:
>>
>> v11->v12:
>> Addressed most of comments from Ilya and Eelco.
>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2020-February/367832.html
>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 3:26 PM Vishal Deep Ajmera
wrote:
>
> v11->v12:
> Addressed most of comments from Ilya and Eelco.
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2020-February/367832.html
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2020-February/367842.html
> Rebased to OVS maste
v11->v12:
Addressed most of comments from Ilya and Eelco.
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2020-February/367832.html
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2020-February/367842.html
Rebased to OVS master.
v10->v11:
Addressed Ben and Ilya's comments.
https://mail.openvsw