On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:42:08 +0200
Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> This is an revival from a thread I initiated earlier this year [0], that
> I had to postpone due to other priorities.
>
> First, I'd like to thanks reviewers of my first proposal, this new
> version tries to address the comments made:
>
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:19:08PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 04:25:10PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 05:23:39PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:17:27AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > > I'm CCing lib
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 04:25:10PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 05:23:39PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:17:27AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > I'm CCing libvir-list and qemu-devel because I would like to get
> > > feedback from libv
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 05:23:39PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:17:27AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > I'm CCing libvir-list and qemu-devel because I would like to get
> > feedback from libvirt and QEMU developers too.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:49:21PM
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:17:27AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> I'm CCing libvir-list and qemu-devel because I would like to get
> feedback from libvirt and QEMU developers too.
>
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:49:21PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 03:42:08PM +0200,
I'm CCing libvir-list and qemu-devel because I would like to get
feedback from libvirt and QEMU developers too.
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:49:21PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 03:42:08PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> > This is an revival from a thread I initiated ea
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 03:42:08PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> This is an revival from a thread I initiated earlier this year [0], that
> I had to postpone due to other priorities.
>
> First, I'd like to thanks reviewers of my first proposal, this new
> version tries to address the comments ma
This is an revival from a thread I initiated earlier this year [0], that
I had to postpone due to other priorities.
First, I'd like to thanks reviewers of my first proposal, this new
version tries to address the comments made:
1.This is Nova's role and not Libvirt's to query hosts supported
comp
