Thanks Illya for pointing out this, I checked if_packet.h in git.kernel.org by
using v3.10 tag, it indeed can support TPACKET_V3
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/uapi/linux/if_packet.h?h=v3.10
William, sorry for late reply.
About your question in
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2020-January/367133.html,
af_packet I was saying is DPDK af_packet, its interface type is dpdk, so its
performance can be up to 4.00Gbps, for non-DPDK interface, handling thread
is ovs-vswitchd
Hi, William
Sorry for last reply, I don't know why I always can't get your comments
email from my outlook, Ben's comments are ok, I also can't see your comments
in outlook junk box.
About your comments in
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2020-January/367146.html, I
checked it in my
Hi, all
Current tap, internal and system interfaces aren't handled by pmd_thread, so
the performance can't be boosted too high, I have a very simple test just by
setting is_pmd to true for them, the below is my data for veth (using
TPACKET_V3), you can see pmd_thread is much better than
Ben, thank you so much for your quick comments, yes, using some code to
check TPACKET features will be better, but I'm not familiar with AC_CHECK*
stuff, it will be better if you can show me a good example for reference,
I'll fix the issues you mentioned in next version. BTW, I'm taking Chinese
