Re: [ovs-dev] OVN L3-HA request for feedback

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo >> wrote: >> > I wanted to share a small status

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN L3-HA request for feedback

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo > wrote: > > I wanted to share a small status update: > > > > Anil and I have been working on this [1] and we expect to post > > some

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN L3-HA request for feedback

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > I wanted to share a small status update: > > Anil and I have been working on this [1] and we expect to post > some preliminary patches before the end of the week. > > I can confirm that the BFD +

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN L3-HA request for feedback

I wanted to share a small status update: Anil and I have been working on this [1] and we expect to post some preliminary patches before the end of the week. I can confirm that the BFD + bundle(active_backup) strategy works well from the hypervisors point of view. With 1 sec BFD pings we get a

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN L3-HA request for feedback

Updating what I wrote yesterday (I hope I won't make people's eyes hurt today) after a talk on IRC (thank you Mickey Spiegel and Gurucharan Shetty): I propose having: 1) chassis on NB/Logical_Router accept multiple chassis, to cover HA on the centralized gateway case for DNAT/SNAT.

[ovs-dev] OVN L3-HA request for feedback

Hello everybody, First I'd like to say hello, because I'll be able to spend more time working with this community, and I'm sure it will be an enjoyable journey for what I've seen (silently watching) during the last few years. I'm planning to start work (together with Anil) on the L3