[ovs-discuss] Add new header support in ovs

Hi all I am interested in add some new header support to OVS. I find some instructions at the end of this page. https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/7169d4fdc8e564331c7a5ad910bc1d99cb413712/FAQ.rst I read the OVS code in related parts. Following is my understanding of how the fields are

Re: [ovs-discuss] [openflow-discuss] Why do port numbers continue to change when I configure ovs with openstack?

> On Jun 7, 2017, at 7:59 AM, Nam Bong Ha wrote: > > Hi, all :) > > > Why do port numbers continue to change when I configure ovs with openstack? > > > > I want to fix the port number of the int-br-wan of br-int(bridge) > > > > However, the port number of

Re: [ovs-discuss] How can I change OpenVSwitch

Yes you have caught my question On 7 Jun 2017 21:24, "Scott Lowe" wrote: > On 06/07/2017 12:25 PM, Simone Aglianò wrote: > > Ok I have to choose reply all > > My question is the initial question regarding the architecture that I > > have attached, I don t want to turn

Re: [ovs-discuss] How can I change OpenVSwitch

On 06/07/2017 12:25 PM, Simone Aglianò wrote: > Ok I have to choose reply all > My question is the initial question regarding the architecture that I > have attached, I don t want to turn my switch in a Open Flow switch but > I would use it like that with Open V Switch I mean I want take the >

Re: [ovs-discuss] How can I change OpenVSwitch

Maybe someone else can help. I'm lost. On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 08:25:09PM +0200, Simone Aglianò wrote: > Ok I have to choose reply all > My question is the initial question regarding the architecture that I have > attached, I don t want to turn my switch in a Open Flow switch but I would > use

Re: [ovs-discuss] How can I change OpenVSwitch

Ok I have to choose reply all My question is the initial question regarding the architecture that I have attached, I don t want to turn my switch in a Open Flow switch but I would use it like that with Open V Switch I mean I want take the advantage of the forwarding capacity of the Catalyst cisco

Re: [ovs-discuss] How can I change OpenVSwitch

Please don't drop the mailing list. Open vSwitch is an OpenFlow switch, so of course it works as if you have an OpenFlow switch: you do! On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 05:42:37PM +0200, Simone Aglianò wrote: > So if I run Floodlight and OpenVSwitch in the same laptop and I just > connect the switch

Re: [ovs-discuss] How can I change OpenVSwitch

On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:50:25PM +0200, Simone Aglianò wrote: > I am working on a project with some challenges and I would like to know > which part of Open vSwitch can I change to reach my goal to communicate > with a Catalyst Cisco Switch that does not support OpenFlow. Open vSwitch supports

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] What's different between ovs bond port and switch lag port?

ovs's bonding supports LAG, Active Backup, SLB. http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/topics/bonding/ 2017-06-07 16:49 GMT+08:00 Sam : > Hi all, > > For switch lag, there are some RFCs to define its behivour. > For ovs bond port, is there some standard to define this? > > I

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK - packets received at dpdk interface but not forwarded to VXLAN port

Sugesh, VNI (now ) is set to 1000 on both sides. The 2 machines are created on AWS Below is the output of both devices (both attempt to ping their peer) - look similar - there is no qinq. I had a configuration problem - fixed already Below you can see that I have a flow (marked **) for

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK - packets received at dpdk interface but not forwarded to VXLAN port

Sugesh, VNI (now ) is set to 1000 on both sides. The 2 machines are created on AWS I had a configuration problem - fixed already Below you can see that I have a flow (marked **) for vxlan encapsulation , but not for vxlan decap .. why is that ? the flow-dump on both sides are quite similar.

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK - packets received at dpdk interface but not forwarded to VXLAN port

Regards _Sugesh > -Original Message- > From: Avi Cohen (A) [mailto:avi.co...@huawei.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 1:21 PM > To: Chandran, Sugesh ; ovs- > disc...@openvswitch.org > Subject: RE: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK - packets received at dpdk interface

[ovs-discuss] How can I change OpenVSwitch

Hello, I am working on a project with some challenges and I would like to know which part of Open vSwitch can I change to reach my goal to communicate with a Catalyst Cisco Switch that does not support OpenFlow. I am attaching the architecture. I hope someone can help me. Best regards Simone

Re: [ovs-discuss] enforce TLSv1.2 in OVN

> From: "Dominik Holler" > To: "Lance Richardson" > Cc: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org, "Numan Siddique" , > "Marcin Mirecki" , "Dan > Kenigsberg" > Sent: Wednesday, 7 June, 2017 3:48:45 AM >

[ovs-discuss] If ovs doesn't masking process in flow_tbl_lookup, What are the disadvantages of ovs?

Hi, I have studied OVS in performance aspect. And, I found out that flow masking and looking up table have quite overhead. I read a paper ' “The Design and Implementation of Open vSwitch.” USENIX NSDI 2015', and discovered that there is why use masking process in the paper. the paper said

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK - packets received at dpdk interface but not forwarded to VXLAN port

Sugesh This is the output from the remote device (the transmitter - tries to ping the other device) ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-flows netdev@ovs-netdev flow-dump from non-dpdk interfaces: recirc_id(0),in_port(4),eth(src=02:d7:d1:26:84:e5,dst=02:fb:9e:ce:f2:0d),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(frag=no),

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK - packets received at dpdk interface but not forwarded to VXLAN port

Thanks you Sugesh Correction See output below : - the last show " ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-flows netdev@ovs-netdev" - the action is 4 to the br-phy . ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-flows netdev@ovs-netdev flow-dump from pmd on cpu core: 7

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK - packets received at dpdk interface but not forwarded to VXLAN port

Regards _Sugesh > -Original Message- > From: Avi Cohen (A) [mailto:avi.co...@huawei.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 11:27 AM > To: Chandran, Sugesh ; ovs- > disc...@openvswitch.org > Subject: RE: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK - packets received at dpdk

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK - packets received at dpdk interface but not forwarded to VXLAN port

Regards _Sugesh > -Original Message- > From: Avi Cohen (A) [mailto:avi.co...@huawei.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 9:26 AM > To: Chandran, Sugesh ; ovs- > disc...@openvswitch.org > Subject: RE: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK - packets received at dpdk interface

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK - packets received at dpdk interface but not forwarded to VXLAN port

Thank you Sugesh The problem is not an arp/route issue. The problem is that Packets received in the peer dpdk not forwarded to the vxlan port for decap. When I tried to investigate it - I saw that in ovs-dpdk setup the outer header received at the peer dpdk interface is - for some reason

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK - packets received at dpdk interface but not forwarded to VXLAN port

Regards _Sugesh > -Original Message- > From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-discuss- > boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Avi Cohen (A) > Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 7:42 AM > To: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org > Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK - packets received at

Re: [ovs-discuss] enforce TLSv1.2 in OVN

On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:26:21 -0400 (EDT) Lance Richardson wrote: > > From: "Dominik Holler" > > To: ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org > > Cc: "Lance Richardson" , "Numan Siddique" > > , "Marcin Mirecki"

[ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK - packets received at dpdk interface but not forwarded to VXLAN port

When I work with native OVS (no DPDK) - the traffic is OK. I see that with native OVS - I have NO VLAN in the outer Ethernet header . in OVS-DPDK - for some reason - I do have VLAN 2047 - see below ### > -Original Message- > From: Avi Cohen (A) > Sent: Tuesday, 06 June, 2017 1:58