Re: [ovs-discuss] conntrack: Another ct-clean thread crash bug

2017-09-11 Thread Darrell Ball
On 9/8/17, 2:51 AM, "wangyunjian" wrote: The operations of buckets->connections hmap should with a lock to protect between ovs-vswitchd thread and pmd thread(or ct clean thread).But conn_clean() will release the lock. This time, the hmap maybe

Re: [ovs-discuss] How to submit a bug report

2017-09-11 Thread Ben Pfaff
I didn't realize that there was different information on the mailing list and in ovs-issues. Thanks for adding the missing information. "git bisect" would probably take 10 tries or less to find the commit, so I'd still like to encourage you to try that approach. On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at

Re: [ovs-discuss] Wireless OVS

2017-09-11 Thread Raymond Burkholder
On 09/11/17 16:20, S hj wrote: In MANET (mobile ad hoc networks), wireless nodes can communicate together without any access points. Should I still consider hostapd for each wireless node in my simulation? If you aren't running it, probably isn't needed. I mention it only because you

Re: [ovs-discuss] How to submit a bug report

2017-09-11 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 07:27:56PM +, Llorente Santos Jesus wrote: > I have been seeing buggy behaviour with the tunnelling ports of OvS. I would > like to ask some help in how to properly submit a bug report > I created an issue in the git "ovs-issues" >

[ovs-discuss] How to submit a bug report

2017-09-11 Thread Llorente Santos Jesus
I have been seeing buggy behaviour with the tunnelling ports of OvS. I would like to ask some help in how to properly submit a bug report I created an issue in the git "ovs-issues" (https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs-issues/issues/134) about 2 weeks ago, but it seems no one is monitoring that.

Re: [ovs-discuss] Wireless OVS

2017-09-11 Thread Christian Esteve Rothenberg
you may want to have a look into how Mininet-WiFi uses OVS in such scenarios. There is code to reproduce a number of MANET use cases, plus an active mailing list (cc:) https://github.com/intrig-unicamp/mininet-wifi/wiki On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Raymond Burkholder

Re: [ovs-discuss] Wireless OVS

2017-09-11 Thread S hj
In MANET (mobile ad hoc networks), wireless nodes can communicate together without any access points. Should I still consider hostapd for each wireless node in my simulation? I only run OVS on each node; however, it seems that I have to configure something to allow nodes to know about the mac

[ovs-discuss] Wireless OVS

2017-09-11 Thread S hj
Hello, I am working with CORE Network Emulator and I implemented a MANET including three wireless nodes. I am trying to run OVS on these three nodes. The topology is as follows, node (1) --- node(2) -- -node(3) In this topology, for the first step, when I run OVS on wireless nodes as a

Re: [ovs-discuss] ovsdb-idl.run-msg many update msgs about br-ex and controller

2017-09-11 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:27:45PM +0800, 顾兆伦 wrote: > Hi all, sorry to bother you. > > When I use python/ovs, idl.run() always costs about 50 ms to execute, and > it runs 50times, what is too long for me. When I check the > msg(msg=self._sesson.recv()), I found this: > [snip almost 2000

Re: [ovs-discuss] Compatible DPDK version for 2.4.0 OVS

2017-09-11 Thread Justin Pettit
According to the FAQ, the version is DPDK 2.0: http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/faq/releases/ If that's incorrect, we should update the FAQ. i agree with Ben, though, that's it's probably best to use OVS 2.8. Thanks, --Justin > On Sep 11, 2017, at 7:57 AM, Avi Cohen (A)

Re: [ovs-discuss] How to build openvswitch with Ddpdk enabled debian package (openvswitch-switch-dpdk.2.7.2-1.deb) for OVS ver. 2.7.2

2017-09-11 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:25:59PM +1200, Brad Cowie wrote: > On 10 September 2017 at 03:17, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 02:26:04AM +, Chou, David J wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I tried to build openvswitch with dpdk enabled debian package > >

Re: [ovs-discuss] Compatible DPDK version for 2.4.0 OVS

2017-09-11 Thread Avi Cohen (A)
dpdk-2.1.0. From: ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Ranjith Kumar D Sent: Monday, 11 September, 2017 5:48 PM To: disc...@openvswitch.org Subject: [ovs-discuss] Compatible DPDK version for 2.4.0 OVS Hi, I am using DPDK 2.0 for OVS

[ovs-discuss] Compatible DPDK version for 2.4.0 OVS

2017-09-11 Thread Ranjith Kumar D
Hi, I am using DPDK 2.0 for OVS 2.4.0 and DPDK library linking is failing while configuring OVS. Is there any specific version of DPDK I should use for 2.4.0 OVS ? Regards, Ranjith ___ discuss mailing list disc...@openvswitch.org

Re: [ovs-discuss] How to build openvswitch with Ddpdk enabled debian package (openvswitch-switch-dpdk.2.7.2-1.deb) for OVS ver. 2.7.2

2017-09-11 Thread Brad Cowie
On 10 September 2017 at 03:17, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 02:26:04AM +, Chou, David J wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I tried to build openvswitch with dpdk enabled debian package > (openvswitch-switch-dpdk.2.7.2-1.deb) for OVS ver. 2.7.2. > > The Debian packaging that

Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] OVS DPDK NUMA pmd assignment question for physical port

2017-09-11 Thread O Mahony, Billy
Hi Wang, I believe that the PMD stats processing cycles includes EMC processing time. This is just in the context of your results being surprising. It could be a factor if you are using code where the bug exists. The patch carries a fixes: tag (I think) that should help you figure out if your

Re: [ovs-discuss] [OVS-Discuss]: configure: error: cannot link with dpdk

2017-09-11 Thread Ranjith Kumar D
Thank you Ben Pfaff, issue is resolved with 2.8.0 OVS. Regards, Ranjith -Original Message- From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@ovn.org] Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2017 10:27 PM To: Ranjith Kumar D Cc: disc...@openvswitch.org Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss]