Re: [ovs-discuss] ***SPAM*** Re: kubernetes - kubeadm problem with watcher

On 16 November 2017 at 09:26, Sébastien Bernard wrote: > On 16/11/2017 13:08, Guru Shetty wrote: > > > > On 16 November 2017 at 01:56, Sébastien Bernard > wrote: > >> Ok, >> >> I got to reproduce the error I had yesterday. >> >> Here's the path : >> >>

Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS binding Port link-status across different ports

On 11/12/2017 1:21 PM, Fred Licht wrote: Hi All, I was curious if there was a way to have an OVS port reflect its up/down status to force a different port’s status to match. I am hosting a firewall VM on a system, and would want to have the LAN interface go down if the upstream (real)

Re: [ovs-discuss] Will fragment be processed in userspace(dpdk) connection track

Yes I have done some work here and it will likely be added for 2.9 From: on behalf of 王嵘 Date: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 at 4:10 AM To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" Subject: [ovs-discuss] Will fragment

Re: [ovs-discuss] What is a l2 pkt microflow

On November 20, 2017 11:44:09 PM PST, Sara Gittlin wrote: >Thank you Ben >Is this L2 flow is an entry in one of the kernel megaflow tables ? >otherwise if it an entry in the kernel microflow table - then there >should be multiple microflow tables, because L2 flow keys

[ovs-discuss] DPDK with UIO drivers is broken on Fedora since OVS 2.8.0

Hi, The current solution for running OVS with non-root user in Fedora makes it not possible to support UIO drivers [1]. Setting the user to root:root via /etc/sysconfig/openvswitch should be a solution, but it is also currently broken, since the systemd ovs-vswitchd.service is forcing the

[ovs-discuss] Will fragment be processed in userspace(dpdk) connection track

hi, I am using ovs-dpdk now, and find that the fragment has not been processed before the userspace connection track, which is very necessary for me to use. And I want to know, whether this function will be added? Thanks very much. WangRong Best Regards.