Re: [Owfs-developers] Announcement for a new 1-wire slave device BAE0910

2010-02-23 Thread Paul Alfille
Power injection. Although which scheme to use is unclear. http://owfs.org/index.php?page=wiring-standards Paul Alfille On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:02 AM, njh wrote: > So are there any shortcomings of existing adapters which would be worth > addressing? > >

Re: [Owfs-developers] Announcement for a new 1-wire slave device BAE0910

2010-02-23 Thread Jerry Scharf
Sorry to be blunt, but this is exactly what I want to avoid. Just because you are implementing your DAC in one form doesn't mean that others will. We need to have a common model that allows OWFS to present a rational access model to differing implementations of the same functionality. That's th

Re: [Owfs-developers] Announcement for a new 1-wire slave device BAE0910

2010-02-23 Thread njh
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 nufan_...@comcast.net wrote: >>> Anyone have other suggestions for functionality? >> >> Integrator, DAC, bidirectional counter ('quadrature'). > > What sort of integration are you talking about here? voltage sampling? sounds > interesting Yep, take a sample every x ms and add

Re: [Owfs-developers] Announcement for a new 1-wire slave device BAE0910

2010-02-23 Thread nufan_wfk
> > Anyone have other suggestions for functionality? > > Integrator, DAC, bidirectional counter ('quadrature'). What sort of integration are you talking about here? voltage sampling? sounds interesting DAC is a higher-level function mapped onto lowlevel features (see my previous email). Can y