Re: [Owfs-developers] DS2482S-100 with an R-Pi

2016-09-08 Thread Juliean Galak
Thank you. I no longer need to use w1, so i2c only is fine and seems easier to use. With only a bit of tweaking (mostly just using "server: i2c=ALL:ALL") those instructions worked perfectly. Thank you! Juliean. On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Jan Kandziora wrote: > Am

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-08 Thread Johan Ström
First of, I agree that writing all content in HTML, even if ever so basic HTML, is tedious when I just want to write text. Having to write italic instead of just *italic* does become quite tiresome in the long run.. Also, I don't want to be forced to click buttons to make my text bold, or to

Re: [Owfs-developers] Changing Alias with pyownet

2016-09-08 Thread Mick Sulley
Well it's reassuring to know that it is not just me :) I have been testing some more and with multiple devices it seems to rename some and then fail part way through. I have code that list all of the devices, the fields and their values. If I run that after a rename failure that fails as

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-08 Thread Jan Kandziora
Am 08.09.2016 um 11:52 schrieb Colin Law: >> >> Face it, simple markup alone will not give you any contributors. Hell, >> non-developer documentation contributors don't want to bother with >> markup at all! > > Wikipedia doesn't seem to have problems getting contributors. > Oh, COME ON. At

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-08 Thread Colin Reese
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 2:53 AM, Stefano Miccoli wrote: > > >> On 08 Sep 2016, at 10:20, Jan Kandziora wrote: >> >> Face it, simple markup alone will not give you any contributors. Hell, >> non-developer documentation contributors don't want to bother with >>

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-08 Thread Stefano Miccoli
> On 08 Sep 2016, at 10:20, Jan Kandziora wrote: > > Face it, simple markup alone will not give you any contributors. Hell, > non-developer documentation contributors don't want to bother with > markup at all! > > What we need is an interface that makes it easy for *anyone* to >

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-08 Thread Colin Law
On 8 September 2016 at 09:20, Jan Kandziora wrote: > Am 08.09.2016 um 09:58 schrieb Colin Law: >> On 7 September 2016 at 23:03, Jan Kandziora wrote: >>> ... >>> In reality, we don't need this "simple" markup when all the people who >>> are contributing to the

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-08 Thread Colin Law
On 7 September 2016 at 23:03, Jan Kandziora wrote: > ... > In reality, we don't need this "simple" markup when all the people who > are contributing to the documentation are developers. Not necessarily true. I have recently been guided on this list as to how to interface 1-wire

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-08 Thread Colin Reese
Here is an example of pages made using Sphinx: https://pgm.readthedocs.io/en/develop/ C > On Sep 7, 2016, at 11:29 PM, Johan Ström wrote: > >> On 08/09/16 00:13, Colin Reese wrote: >> What are the cons for a github-hosted wiki again? > Well, my only objection would be that

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-08 Thread Matthias Urlichs
On 08.09.2016 08:29, Johan Ström wrote: > Regardless of which one we find most > suiting, I'd say we should keep all info in *one* place Personally I'd rather use Sphinx or similar. The main reason is that it's reasonably easy to sustain a coherent narrative structure, i.e. one could convert the

Re: [Owfs-developers] New site

2016-09-08 Thread Johan Ström
On 08/09/16 00:13, Colin Reese wrote: > What are the cons for a github-hosted wiki again? Well, my only objection would be that it is a third party, but since "we" don't really have a proper organization or funding or anything like that which would naturally be able to "run it ourselfs", every