On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Jan Kandziora wrote:
Am Samstag, 18. März 2006 01:28 schrieb Marek Wodzinski:
Hello,
Sometimes there are questions about programming in bash. I have two mini
hardware projects which are controlled by (not so simple) bash scripts, so
if anyone is interested in sample
Hello,
Sometimes there are questions about programming in bash. I have two mini
hardware projects which are controlled by (not so simple) bash scripts, so
if anyone is interested in sample scripts, there are available at
http://majek.mamy.to/1wire/
Best regards
majek
--
"If you want someth
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Marek Wodzinski wrote:
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Paul Alfille wrote:
Majek,
I've looked at the problem you've found, and now can see it clearly.
[...]
I'm not sure your patch quite addresses the problem. I fear the true patch
will be a little uglier, and pr
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Paul Alfille wrote:
Majek,
I've looked at the problem you've found, and now can see it clearly.
[...]
I'm not sure your patch quite addresses the problem. I fear the true patch
will be a little uglier, and probably not done till next week.
My patch changed (broke?) read
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Paul Alfille wrote:
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 04:37 pm, Marek Wodzinski wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Alfille, Paul H.,M.D. wrote:
Ahhh... I'm sorta a software guy. 1=on 0=off
Sorry for all the confusion.
I'm a hardware based software guy:-)
The easiest way
t in
DS2413 - you must always set two bits together.
Regards
majek
--
"If you want something done...do yourself!"
Jean-Baptiste Emmanuel Zorg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marek
Wodzinski
Sent: Wednesday, Octo
t;
Jean-Baptiste Emmanuel Zorg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marek
Wodzinski
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 2:50 PM
To: Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Owfs-developers] 1=conducting ?
Hello,
I know that now is too late
Hello,
There is a bug in operating on PIO.A or PIO.B.
If you write to PIO.A, state of PIO.B (and vice versa) is fetched from pin
state instead of latch state. This lead to loss of state of PIO.B if you
write to PIO.A (and vice versa).
For example:
I have pull down resistor in PIN.B, so:
cat se
Hello,
I know that now is too late for 'idea' correction, but in 'real'
electronic world all 'switches' like DS with open drain/collector
and second pin grounded, have clearly defined conducted state as 0
because this IS a 0 state in CMOS and TTL logic.
I saw on the list also some problems
