>> --
>> *From:* Paul Alfille [paul.alfi...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 23, 2015 7:18 PM
>>
>> *To:* owfs-developers
>> *Subject:* Re: [Owfs-developers] Add support for additional hardware bus
>> master
>>
&
>
> Thank you for your support.
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
> --
> *From:* Paul Alfille [paul.alfi...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 23, 2015 7:18 PM
>
> *To:* owfs-developers
> *Subject:* Re: [Owfs-developers] Add support for additio
Paul Alfille [paul.alfi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 7:18 PM
To: owfs-developers
Subject: Re: [Owfs-developers] Add support for additional hardware bus master
I'm working on the ds1wm support. Just got example code from Maxim. How about
basing you modifications from that.
Paul
his should be
> done?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Paul Alfille [mailto:paul.alfi...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, February 20, 2015 3:32 PM
> *To:* OWFS (One-wire file system) discussion and help
> *Subject:* Re: [Owfs-develop
: OWFS (One-wire file system) discussion and help
Subject: Re: [Owfs-developers] Add support for additional hardware bus master
Optimally the number of channels should be auto-discovered. I like to make the
configuration as automatic as possible.
So if the hardware can be safely probed for the
[mailto:paul.alfi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 3:32 PM
To: OWFS (One-wire file system) discussion and help
Subject: Re: [Owfs-developers] Add support for additional hardware bus master
Optimally the number of channels should be auto-discovered. I like to make the
configuration as
gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, February 20, 2015 1:43 PM
> *To:* owfs-developers
> *Subject:* Re: [Owfs-developers] Add support for additional hardware bus
> master
>
>
>
> Do you map the 6 control registers to consecutive memory locations? Would
> we pass that location
,
Martin
From: Paul Alfille [mailto:paul.alfi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 1:43 PM
To: owfs-developers
Subject: Re: [Owfs-developers] Add support for additional hardware bus master
Do you map the 6 control registers to consecutive memory locations? Would we
pass that location in a
Do you map the 6 control registers to consecutive memory locations? Would
we pass that location in a command line option?
On Feb 19, 2015 12:16 PM, "Jan Kandziora" wrote:
> Am 19.02.2015 um 08:59 schrieb Martin Rapavy:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > thanks for briefing me on the architecture of OWFS. My ma
Am 19.02.2015 um 08:59 schrieb Martin Rapavy:
> Hi Paul,
>
> thanks for briefing me on the architecture of OWFS. My master chip
> has almost exactly the same register interface as Dallas DS1WM
> (http://datasheets.maximintegrated.com/en/ds/DS1WM.pdf). It only
> differs in one register: Clock divis
2:39 AM
To: owfs-developers
Subject: Re: [Owfs-developers] Add support for additional hardware bus master
Adding support for a new bus-master chip is actually rather easy. OWFS only
requires a few functions be supported. This is actually the point of OWFS: the
bus master and slave functions are
Adding support for a new bus-master chip is actually rather easy. OWFS only
requires a few functions be supported. This is actually the point of OWFS:
the bus master and slave functions are encapsulated easily. Since we
support so many different devices, the level of abstraction is very precise.
1
Am 18.02.2015 um 21:58 schrieb Martin Rapavy:
Option C Memory-mapped IO from userspace, which is
*UGH!*. See module/owlib/src/c/ow/ow_ds2482.c for all the
things to write and change. The disadvantage is owfs has to run
as root to do MMIO.
>>> I don't mind running under
> Am 18.02.2015 um 21:19 schrieb Martin Rapavy:
> > I was exactly in favor of avoiding w1 because of bus polling. It is
> > important for me not to use the bus frequently (the wire is also
> > shared for reading out data from sensors). Do you think that the w1
> > polling might be turned off using
Am 18.02.2015 um 21:19 schrieb Martin Rapavy:
> I was exactly in favor of avoiding w1 because of bus polling. It is
> important for me not to use the bus frequently (the wire is also
> shared for reading out data from sensors). Do you think that the w1
> polling might be turned off using w1_master_
> Am 18.02.2015 um 15:34 schrieb Martin Rapavy:
> > To add some technical details to my query: the bus master chip in
> > question si very similiar to DS1WM (which is something like
> > DS2482-800 but with memory-mapped registers, instead of I2C access).
> > After browsing the sources for some time
Am 18.02.2015 um 15:34 schrieb Martin Rapavy:
> To add some technical details to my query: the bus master chip in
> question si very similiar to DS1WM (which is something like
> DS2482-800 but with memory-mapped registers, instead of I2C access).
> After browsing the sources for some time I conclud
x27;s going to be
very hard to identify all the places where to hook-in support for new bus
master.
Thanks,
Martin
From: Rapavy Martin
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 10:35 AM
To: owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net; paul.alfi...@gmail.com
Subject: [Owfs-developers] Add support for addit
Dear owfs developers,
I'm currently exploring options of adding custom hardware-based onewire master
chip support into owfs. Could you explain which parts of the software stack of
owfs would need to be extended/altered in order to add new bus master support
(or perhaps point me to relevant docu
19 matches
Mail list logo
