Great! :)
On 07/04/16 20:33, Nico Bouthoorn wrote:
> I've pulled the latest master, in a fresh install.It is working!
>
> thanks,
>
> Nico
>
> Johan Ström wrote:
>> Since this HW is out there in unknown number of deployments, it makes more
>> sense to add a SW fix. I added a verify_mask which
I've pulled the latest master, in a fresh install.It is working!
thanks,
Nico
Johan Ström wrote:
> Since this HW is out there in unknown number of deployments, it makes more
> sense to add a SW fix. I added a verify_mask which ignores the button
> pull-ups on read-back.
>
> Nico: Can you p
Since this HW is out there in unknown number of deployments, it makes
more sense to add a SW fix. I added a verify_mask which ignores the
button pull-ups on read-back.
Nico: Can you pull latest master and try that?
If 'git show HEAD' shows your revert at the top, you must first do 'git
reset -
Hello again,
I've gotten some helpful off-list response from Der Tiger, and to sum it up.
The hardware Tiger uses (Hobbyboard) is electrically identical to the on
Nico uses (https://fstab.nl/en/lcd_owfs), except that the Hobbyboard
schematic has 3 pushbuttons between P0..P3 and GND, with 10nF
Am 31.03.2016 um 23:31 schrieb Johan Ström:
> Great, now we have the exact source of the problem at least :)
>
> I'm wondering if that code is actually right (with or without
> patch).. Not sure what LCD_COMMAND_ATTENTION is intended to do? And
> shouldn't LCD_COMMAND_4_BIT be written with NIBBLE_
Great, now we have the exact source of the problem at least :)
I'm wondering if that code is actually right (with or without patch)..
Not sure what LCD_COMMAND_ATTENTION is intended to do? And shouldn't
LCD_COMMAND_4_BIT be written with NIBBLE_CTRL?
Anyone on the list who uses these/wrote the
