Hi Guys,
I know this thread is marked as OT, but I don't think it even comes close to
being within that very broad scope for the OZDOTNET list . The majority of
recent posts have all been just opinions, and everyone has a right to hold
them, and I defend everyone's right to their own opinion.
+1
Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Andrew tand...@tassoc.com.au
Sender: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:48:41
To: 'ozDotNet'ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
Reply-To: ozDotNet ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
Subject: RE: [OT] Friday - Conway (or..
Trevor work's for Conroy?
He wants to filter the post
+1
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Dan Cash dan.c...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
--
*From: *Trevor Andrew tand...@tassoc.com.au
*Sender: *ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
*Date:
Folks, last year I experimented with the Entity Frame 1 and after therapy to
recover I decided that it was too immature to use in a production app. The
vote
http://efvote.wufoo.com/forms/ado-net-entity-framework-vote-of-no-confidenc
e/ of no confidence it received back then was based on more
Hi Greg,
. The vote of no confidence
http://efvote.wufoo.com/forms/ado-net-entity-framework-vote-of-no-confidenc
e/
Agree. The soap packets in ASP.NET web-services were verbose as well. We
boxed/unboxed from Entities to changes-only CSV data either side of the
web-service to help with
