Re: More on cross-platform development

2013-01-04 Thread Greg Keogh
I don't think you should try and port complex business applications to a phone, but specific features suit a phone. Dead right! Your salon app is a perfect example. But as progress produces more smaller and useful devices of various kinds we developers suffer with more code and app versions.

RE: More on cross-platform development

2013-01-04 Thread Katherine Moss
I suppose it's a question of who is right in terms of the future. I have read so many articles that insult .net to the core, and it kills me. I'll never forget the guy who called the .NET Framework and it's set of development tools a McDonalds assembly line! Anyway, what I mean, is with all

Re: More on cross-platform development

2013-01-04 Thread David Connors
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Katherine Moss katherine.m...@gordon.eduwrote: I suppose it’s a question of who is right in terms of the future. I have read so many articles that insult .net to the core, and it kills me. I’ll never forget the guy who called the .NET Framework and it’s set of

RE: More on cross-platform development

2013-01-04 Thread Greg Low (GregLow.com)
Well said David. One thing I'd like to add to the conversation though is that I see people all the time that consider their mobile interfaces as a low functionality add-on to the real application. While I've dealt with mobile apps that way in the past, I'm increasingly changing my view.