platforms have eventually got right
over a 35+ year maturation cycle. Or is your single-file database already
(somehow) happy with multi-thread/multi-user access?
From: Greg Keogh
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2015 1:20 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Sharing a database file
Thanks everyone, I'll
Hi Greg, just wrote this blog post yesterday - might be of use:
http://dontcodetired.com/blog/post/Painless-NET-Windows-Service-Creation-with-Topshelf.aspx
if you go the Win Service route.
Jason Roberts
Journeyman Software Developer
Twitter: @robertsjason
Blog: http://DontCodeTired.com
Plu
Thanks everyone, I'll stir all the ideas in a pot, cook it overnight and
see what's floated to the top in the morning. The LocalDb option is
something I forgot existed and I may use it in a different project. Using a
hidden console app seems easiest at the moment, as the installer can add
the singl
:57 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Sharing a database file
With the “SQL Server has too many dependencies that aren’t available”, which
dependencies are the issue?
Have you considered the localdb option? It’s targeted pretty much right at what
you’re describing.
Pardon, I was a bit vague there .
Yeah what are these dependencies you speak of?
Sql server is a windows service already ;)
On Wednesday, 11 November 2015, Greg Low (罗格雷格博士) wrote:
> With the “SQL Server has too many dependencies that aren’t available”,
> which dependencies are the issue?
>
>
>
> Have you considered the localdb
>
> With the “SQL Server has too many dependencies that aren’t available”,
> which dependencies are the issue?
>
> Have you considered the localdb option? It’s targeted pretty much right at
> what you’re describing.
>
Pardon, I was a bit vague there ... the servers running these apps don't
come wi
-express.aspx
Regards,
Greg
Dr Greg Low
1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913 fax
SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com<http://www.sqldownunder.com/>
From: Greg Low (罗格雷格博士)
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2015 3:52 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: RE: Sha
On 11 November 2015 at 15:16, Greg Keogh wrote:
> Howdy again, I'm thinking aloud about a problem here in case there is
> lateral thinking available.
>
> We have a mature app that uses a single-file database that is locked. Now
> new apps want to use this file as well, but how can they share it?
With the “SQL Server has too many dependencies that aren’t available”, which
dependencies are the issue?
Have you considered the localdb option? It’s targeted pretty much right at what
you’re describing.
Regards,
Greg
Dr Greg Low
1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3
Maybe a self-hosted API using something like NancyFX?
Eg:
http://blog.amosti.net/self-hosted-http-service-in-c-with-nancy-and-topshelf/
and also https://github.com/NancyFx/Nancy/wiki/Self-Hosting-Nancy
This is also pretty interesting too:
http://www.onegeek.com.au/articles/a-nancy-net-microservic
Option 2:
A windows service (as far as .Net is concerned) is any executable assembly that
exposes a class derived from ServiceBase.
I normally have my services written as a Console Application. Then, when the
console app is run, if it’s an interactive session then I manually start the
servi
Because the functionality of setting up and installing a Windows
Service is almost "out-of-the-box" available now, and has been
available fairly easily since the start of the .NET Framework AFAIR,
I'd go for that if at all possible.
We have a range of "agents" that require a console to auto-logon
12 matches
Mail list logo