Re: WinRT vs World+Dog

2011-09-27 Thread Scott Barnes
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:35 AM, David Connors wrote: > > I, for one, welcome our new WinRT overlords and look forward to an > expedited demise of the rest of the API/UI kit confusion on the Windows > platform. Something had to give in light of the relative sanity of Cocoa/OSX > + CocoaTouch/OSX

RE: WinRT vs World+Dog

2011-09-27 Thread David Kean
If you think that WinRT got rid of UI threads and message pumps, you’d be wrong. :) From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of David Connors Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 1:35 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: WinRT vs World+Dog On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:

Re: WinRT vs World+Dog

2011-09-27 Thread Winston Pang
I thought so, I don't think it's anything different to today, what the Windows team has learnt and taken is to mandate asynchronous calls for all Metro apps (A silverlight thing), sandbox and restrict file access, bring more friendly looking API's (A .NET thing). Correct me if I'm wrong, everything

Re: WinRT vs World+Dog

2011-09-27 Thread David Connors
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:08 AM, David Kean wrote: > If you think that WinRT got rid of UI threads and message pumps, you’d be > wrong. :) > > ** > That is really disappointing. -- *David Connors* | da...@codify.com | www.codify.com Codify Pty Ltd Phone: +61 (7) 3210 6268 | Facsimile: +61

Re: WinRT vs World+Dog

2011-09-27 Thread Preet Sangha
On 28 September 2011 14:24, David Connors wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:08 AM, David Kean wrote: > >> If you think that WinRT got rid of UI threads and message pumps, you’d >> be wrong. :) >> >> ** >> > > That is really disappointing. > Why? The technologies are tried and tested and h

Re: WinRT vs World+Dog

2011-09-27 Thread Joseph Cooney
Wpf was unable to ditch the ui thread and message pump stuff because it caused problems with the clip board (and possibly other things). Probably the same thing with WinRT. On 28/09/2011, at 11:24 AM, David Connors wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:08 AM, David Kean wrote: > If you think th

Re: WinRT vs World+Dog

2011-09-27 Thread Scott Barnes
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Joseph Cooney wrote: > Wpf was unable to ditch the ui thread and message pump stuff because it > caused problems with the clip board (and possibly other things). Probably > the same thing with WinRT. > > No, WinRT is better, Steve promised us this new world is goi

Re: WinRT vs World+Dog

2011-09-28 Thread David Connors
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Preet Sangha wrote: > > On 28 September 2011 14:24, David Connors wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:08 AM, David Kean wrote: >> >>> If you think that WinRT got rid of UI threads and message pumps, you’d >>> be wrong. :) >>> >>> ** >>> >> >> That is real