From:
Lynne Staff
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 6:42
AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] babies in
recovery/FH monitoring
I'm trying to get the message about this but am a
bit in the dark - babies not allowed to be with their mothers because of ot
HING to do with the woman having the baby.
- Original Message -
From:
Mary
Murphy
To: list
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:41
AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] babies in
recovery/FH monitoring
Cas wrote:"it is normal practice to have bub
in recovery so long
As regards the FH monitoring giudelines when you
look at the NICE site their recommendations flow from the Royal College of Obs
&Gobs
so I wondered what the kiwi and Dutch midwves
do??
When I started to search
I found the debate is happening in NZ as to
But
W
To: list
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 8:41
AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] babies in
recovery/FH monitoring
Cas wrote:"it is normal practice to have bub
in recovery so long as both mother and baby are well."
Unfortunately this is not so here in
Perth. We
Westbury
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2003
8:41 AM
To: list
Subject: [ozmidwifery] babies in
recovery/FH monitoring
Cas
wrote:"it is normal practice to have bub in recovery so long as
Not so where I work either. A few of us have
tried, but so far it has fallen on deaf ears.
Cheers, Joanne.
- Original Message -
From:
Mary
Murphy
To: list
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:41
AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] babies in
recovery/FH monitoring
Cas wrote:"it is normal practice to have bub in
recovery so long as both mother and baby are well."
Unfortunately this is not so here in
Perth. We have had major battles over many years to have well babies stay
with their mothers in recovery at KEMH but this has been denied for many
reas
