Re: [ozmidwifery] who is really there for women ?
long
Dear Barb and
allSomehow Joy has not understood what I meant.I was talking
about new programs and the fact that midwifery must have its own scope of
practice. Yes women must have access to a full range of choice.
No
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] who is really there for women ? long
Dear Barb and all
Somehow Joy has not understood what I meant.
I was talking about new programs and the fact that midwifery must have its own scope of practice. Yes women must have access to a full range of choice. No one EVER
ginal Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jen
SempleSent: Tuesday, 14 October 2003 4:32 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ozmidwifery] who is really
there for women ? long
From Joy Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
I think we all need to
see
that Midwifery models of care will become the norm in this
nation
Alesa
Alesa
KoziolClinical Midwifery EducatorMelbourne
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 10:34
AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] who is r
From Joy Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
I think we all need to see Jan's case as an extreme case. This is bullying, and unfortunately it will always occur. Even midwives can be bullies. Its a human trait to want to dominate and control. The doctor in this case may have been dreadfully upset ab
In a message dated 13/10/03 11:02:18 PM AUS Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree with you Tina wholeheartedly! However I ask How do we muster the collective wisdom of those midwives into action in their individual workplaces and motivate them to unite to change? I see time and
PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] who is
really there for women ? long
I agree with you Tina wholeheartedly! However I
ask How do we muster the collective wisdom of those midwives into action in
their individual workplaces and motivate them to unite to change? I see
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] who is really there for women ? long
JUstine and all"
Yikes: I thought I sent off the beginning of the
last email accidently and it turns out it just
disappeared>>>
What I was starting to say was I think caseload
midwives should develop their own
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] who is really there for women ? long
Justine and all: This was the actual beginning of
the last 2 messages, sorry to be so confusing!!
Justine wrote: Midwives
must have an scope of practice in their own right (and this is what the
Dutch do).
I think as midwives
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] who is really there for women ? long
So sorry, hit the wrong key and sent it off without
salutation. So, if you wont transfer for meconium, you simply don't write
it as a reason you would do so. Of course you need to be able to defend
your position shoul
fixed obstacles preventing such organized action.
Late night reflections. Cheers Louise
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:28
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] who is really
there
In a message dated 13/10/03 1:55:01 PM AUS Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I totally agree. Collaboration is the way forward but medical control of midwifery is not collaboration, collaboration is a 2 way street not something dictated by Obstetrics. Midwives must have an scope
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] who is really there for women ? long
Justine u wrote
As for independent homebirth practitioners, we
legally don’t have them (this is the choice women are most unable to access)
there is no respect for the professionalism of midwifery outside the system (by
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] who is really there for women ? long
Hi Julie and all
I totally agree. Collaboration is the way forward but medical control of midwifery is not collaboration, collaboration is a 2 way street not something dictated by Obstetrics. Midwives must have an scope of
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] who is really there for women ? long
Dear Justine
We all know there are better models of
care for example in Holland but to transplant that model here, rapidly would be
about as difficult / impossible as trying to change our culture to the extent
of making
Title: Message
OMG. That is
disgusting. I agree with Justine. Free standing birth centres are a must. They
may have cont. of care in NZ but they still have high intervention rates. In the
Netherlands however, they have birthing hotels for women who don't want to birth
at their home and their
Subject: [ozmidwifery] who is really
there for women ? long
THEY ARE A HEALTHY HAPPY, WELL PREPARED AND
CONFIDENT COUPLE BOOKED INTO BIRTH CENTRE AN TAKING MW ALONG
1ST BABE TERM PLUS 5 DAYS srom SMIDGEN OF
MEC CTG PERFECT 2hrs later and she is in good labour standing with
mo
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] who is really there for women ? long
No Jan not just one to one midwifery, but stand alone midwifery where midwives and women decide what is best and when they need medical assistance. To me Birth Centres continue to set women up while ever they are under medical
: Saturday, October 11, 2003 7:46
PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] who is really
there for women ? long
THEY ARE A HEALTHY HAPPY, WELL PREPARED AND
CONFIDENT COUPLE BOOKED INTO BIRTH CENTRE AN TAKING MW ALONG
1ST BABE TERM PLUS 5 DAYS srom SMIDGEN OF
MEC CTG PERFECT 2hrs later
THEY ARE A HEALTHY HAPPY, WELL PREPARED AND
CONFIDENT COUPLE BOOKED INTO BIRTH CENTRE AN TAKING MW ALONG
1ST BABE TERM PLUS 5 DAYS srom SMIDGEN OF MEC
CTG PERFECT 2hrs later and she is in good labour standing with monitor on
working happily adjusted well with transfer and then the
20 matches
Mail list logo
