nal births
anymore except for the woman who arrives pushing with head on view!!!
kathy
- Original Message -
From: "Marilyn Kleidon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 12:00 AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] C/S in Sydney Morning He
Date: Friday, October
24, 2003 07:17:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
[ozmidwifery] C/S in Sydney Morning Herald
I agree Marilyn. Another sneaking suspicion in my mind is
that in thistrial, I am sure they will bring forward a qualitative
arm,
ingly
willing to work to achieve their goal.
Love Sally Westbury
- Original Message -
From: "Marilyn Kleidon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] C/S in Sydney Morning Herald
> I just had
x27;t they?
- Original Message -
From: "Marilyn Kleidon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] C/S in Sydney Morning Herald
> I just had this thought while having the morning shower:
>
> I t
Thursday, October 23, 2003 12:34 AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] C/S in Sydney Morning Herald
> Have heard it said that since most women in
> Australia are having 2 children these days, 2 c/s is not such a bad thing
> like why risk a vaginal birth ( said by a woman). It just breaks my heart.
> T
al Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, October
23, 2003 18:05:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
[ozmidwifery] C/S in Sydney Morning Herald
Have heard it said that since most women inAustralia
are having 2 children these days, 2 c/s i
Have heard it said that since most women in
Australia are having 2 children these days, 2 c/s is not such a bad thing
like why risk a vaginal birth ( said by a woman). It just breaks my heart.
Too many failed inductions, too many interventions, too much fear.
thinking of going fishing
marilyn
that it gets front page coverage. After all the
> trial hasn't even been approved yet.
>
> I think it is very appropriate that we are discussing Sonia's story at the
> same time as this,
>
> Yours in wonder at the world
>
> Claire Saxby
> >From: Sandi <[
odies later if anyone is interested - haven't finished the articles yet!
- Original Message -
From: "Sandi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 7:40 AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] C/S in Sydney Morning Herald
> Yes, I could hardly
me time as this,
Yours in wonder at the world
Claire Saxby
From: Sandi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] C/S in Sydney Morning Herald
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 07:40:42 +1000
Yes, I could hardly believe my ears when the obs told us
countering this abhorrent research
Sandra
- Original Message -
From: "Lynne Staff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] C/S in Sydney Morning Herald
> "there is this trial which gives yo
I unfortuneately (or maybe fortuneately by the sounds of things) did not get to read the SMH article.
I must admit though reading through some of the comments here and having read the results of the term breech hold the same fears as many of you do. The term breech trial has meant that many wom
: Re: [ozmidwifery] C/S in Sydney Morning Herald
We know the flaws in the touted breech trial were the location and
quality
> of staff chosen to assist in womens pursuence of vaginal breech. The
> lack
of
> familiarity or experience itself was somewhat prohibitive. Not much is
made
>
he birthdoers? Are they all to have epidurals?
Are they able to be up and about? How are the researchers going to work
these little foibles out?
- Original Message -
From: "Selangor Maternity Centre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2
Hey Nigel!
Welcome back!
- Original Message -
From: "Selangor Maternity Centre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 4:21 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] C/S in Sydney Morning Herald
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks Lynne whereas I a
t's
not exactly pain free is it?
Cas McCullough
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.casmccullough.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lynne Staff
Sent: Sunday, 19 October 2003 9:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] C/S in Sydney M
for this. Major heebeejeebies.
- Original Message -
From: "Neretlis, Bethany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 6:38 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] C/S in Sydney Morning Herald
> we have been discussing this article too, or an
beejeebies.
- Original Message -
From: "Neretlis, Bethany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 6:38 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] C/S in Sydney Morning Herald
> we have been discussing this article too, or an offshoot fro
we have been discussing this article too, or an offshoot from perth. it seems to me to
be a further automatic kneejerk reaction to litigation from those experts at strange
who are from the usa. i can just see some insurance company paying for this research,
and unfortunately i can even see some
Title: C/S in Sydney Morning Herald
Justine,
On behalf of all women who are to bear
Australia's future babes, I thank you for your dedication and
tenacity.
The general public need to be made fully aware
of this ever increasing trend of c.sectioning and all it's risks. Womankind's inherent
20 matches
Mail list logo
