RE: 70-541 course

+1 to Paul's comments. SharePoint 2007 dev will be around for a long time, not sure where you current skills are (recognise your name from this list) but I would recommend getting certified in 2007. The general principles will be the same and there are plenty of study guides out there for t

RE: SUG.org

Doh! And here I was scrutinising the source and web calls through Fiddler! :) Thanks. It looks great. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meinertz Sent: Wednesday, 24 March 2010 3:44 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: SUG.org In the footer: "Powered by

No. of sharepoint databases in Sql Server

I am looking at project where we will be provisioning new site collections in a new DB. Is there any kind of recommendation that how many databases we can have in Sql Server. I think I read somewhere that having more than 60 dbs can degrade performance,, can't find where I read. Please let me kn

RE: No. of sharepoint databases in Sql Server

See: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1054016/maximum-number-of-databases-in-sql-server-2008 What matters is how much memory, CPU and disk you have for the load, not how many DBs. I have seen production systems with 100s of DBs that seem to work fine.

Re: No. of sharepoint databases in Sql Server

Unsure on total number, but I would assume it depends greatly on resources, disk/CPU/ram due to the nature of the beast. The more resources, the faster disks, etc would dictate it to a large degree i believe. -DB On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Ajay wrote: > I am looking at project where we

SP2010 - Hierarchical Taxonomies

Hi All, A quick question regarding Hierarchical Taxonomies in SP 2010. I've been exploring them via the Managed Metadata Server, and am very impressed with their usefulness, except for one thing. In my Beta explorations, the only way I've seen them "exposed" when viewing a list or library is vi

RE: No. of sharepoint databases in Sql Server

And if you enable usage statistics you can expect that space to dwindle very, very quickly indeed. Regards, Paul Online Developer, ICT CEO Sydney From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Brown Sent: Thursday, 25 March 2010 1:52 PM To: ozMOSS Subjec

RE: No. of sharepoint databases in Sql Server

When it comes to scalability, there ideally are two ways to achieve it1. Scaling up or 2. Scaling out. Scaling up is normally done to manage volume on a single high performance server, while scaling out is ideally used to distribute load among multiple servers, also, with scaling up you add reso

RE: No. of sharepoint databases in Sql Server

Whereas scaling around is just skirting the problem and won’t get you anywhere. ;) From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of ra...@nationalcom.com Sent: Thursday, 25 March 2010 2:29 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: No. of sharepoint databases in Sql Server When i

Re: No. of sharepoint databases in Sql Server

Looks not very good to have more than 100 site collections (which have their own db) in a single web app. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262787.aspx