I will be out of the office starting 12/03/2009 and will not return until
30/09/2009.
Please email mike.stringfel...@sevensigma.com.au instead.
___
Unencrypted electronic mail is not secure and may not be authentic.
If
I will be out of the office starting 12/03/2009 and will not return until
31/10/2010.
Please email mike.stringfel...@sevensigma.com.au instead.
___
Unencrypted electronic mail is not secure and may not be authentic.
If
to take Sezai's
favourite, MCSM content with links based on GUID's, and whack it in SP, as
well as a docs from a doc management system that used Id's, so it made a
lot of sense.
MS
- Forwarded by Michael Stringfellow/CSC/CB/B
That's why people end up using a look-up url, that returns docs based on a
unique document management system id or guid (internal CAML or look-up from
a list).
It's also why you end up with an extra column on all your custom content
types - Original GUID - that won't change in migrations, deployme
Easy, easy.
I asked because I, like many others I'm guessing, request some software,
get told where it is on the network, skim read some EULA text and click ok
to install.
I've had no exposure to the differences you mention and don't understand
the implications. If it's against the EULA, does tha
Calling all AU contract law experts!
Is it illegal, if you have a license for the product AND server anyway?
As Tommy noted, many use laptops, and running up virtual images can drown
slow memory and HD subsystems. That's why I asked the question and was
considering it.
Unsupported and strongly
Has anyone tried bamboo solutions free tool to get WSS+MOSS on Vista 32 or
64bit + SQLExpress?
http://community.bamboosolutions.com/blogs/bambooteamblog/archive/2008/05/21/how-to-install-windows-sharepoint-services-3-0-sp1-on-vista-x64-x86.aspx
I'm tempted to give it a go on my own PC to see if
Thanks Paul - the doc workspace doesn't sound quite right from my reading
so far, but I'll test it out.
1. Sending the docs means I'll have to programmatically copy the meta-data
back and forth as well, and as you mention, merging versions back when
multiple projects have worked on them is almost
Maybe not - I've not used them so it looks like asking the question is
paying off already!
I guess there would be a workspace per project, so the only thing I can
think of is when multiple projects are working on the same files.
Can you organise those workspaces into a site structure as detailed
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to get his sort of functionality?:
Basically a 'project' view of the world with a project doc and links to the
docs elsewhere it involves. Those links point to their 'systems
documentation' with a life beyond the many individual projects that include
them.
Daniel,
We would all love to have our own 64bit Server under the desk to develop
on. But until recently, MS haven't been supporting us Devs on that target
OS, as their focus was on the majority of devs using 32 bit client OSes.
And most organisations don't have deep enough pockets, don't allow Ser
Fundamentally I'm with you, and your users, on this Ivan - it's just
another type of content.
Unfortunately I'm an idealist, so in practical terms you probably shouldn't
do it!
The main reason is the law of unintended consequences. Sometime you go down
a path (especially with SharePoint's complex
Can you:
1. If you are using 'edit in ms word', can you instead out the document
manually in SP first, and then edit in word?
2. Both access the documents as read-only from the link?
I've seen this behaviour before, but can't for the life of me remember what
it was now I'm afraid.
Mike.
Update: Yippe - a solution to this!!!
There was nothing as fancy as a group policy doing this (I searched my
registry without luck, but beware that the Word 2003 file location runs
home to C:\Documents and Settings\CurrentUser\Application
Data\Microsoft\Templates even without a setting).
It turns
Yep - stapling always sounds like what you want, but rarely meets what you
need - more caveats than a lawyers office.
Caveat Utilitor Stapling
Sorry, but as far as I know there is no single way to add and activate
features on all existing and new sites.
I'd run the 2 stsadm commands to install and activate, if activate by
default doesn't kick in. The add the feature to the desired soltuions/site
definitions for new sites. Sorry, not sing
>From memory, feature stapling won't activate those at a web scope.
You may also hit issues with;
a. the site not being fully provisioned if you have a mechanism to activate
them though code (ensure you test the provisioning status property).
b. The order of the 'staplee' features is not as you l
A belated Happy New Year to the list!.
A little help though please, as I've not looked into document templates
much before and they are causing me grief!
I've got a standard doc library with versioning, 'require checkout for
edit' and a single custom content type (with a custom approvals workflo
You probably need to push out a new/changed browser settings policy for the
ie 'content zone' you are targetting, or even specific settings for your
domain.
Regards, Mike.
Sounds like a cache issue, probably on the client.
Tomm
I hope that wasn't Java dripping over you .net code.
Given past hotfix experience, and sticking with the metaphor, I'd let the
cumulative update cool for a while to see if anyone else is a mug and burns
their mouth on it first...
MS
21 matches
Mail list logo
