Re: Lots of bind/notify classes

For the VMs I'm using an AOP (using CastleDynamicProxy for Debug and PostSharp for Release) to automatically do this for me. Jonas bloggedabout this approach. For PostSharp, I don't have a link, but I could send you a code that

Re: Lots of bind/notify classes

I just saw everyone was alredy talking about PostSharp. Sorry I should read the thread before replying. BTW, it doesn't affect Blendability. I can live with what Steven suggested, of having that extra line bit of code for each property, but it gets a bit messy when you have derived properties. O

Re: Images invisible

If you have another proxy the 127.0.0.1. (see the . at the end) trick doesn't work. Try using the computer name instead. @Stehpen, I didn't know about the somesite.com trick. Hwoever, it doesn't work from my machine, I'll try it at home. On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Greg Keogh wrote: > I

RE: Lots of bind/notify classes

Chaps, I have decided that snippets are the quickest way out of this at the moment. It doesn't modularise or reduce the property code, but at least it means I can create them faster. Actually, I forgot how good snippets are. For some reason I neglected them for the last couple of years, now I'm

Re: Images invisible

It may fail for you from home too. I just tried it on my machine and it didn't work. Pinging somesite.com is actually resolving to a real looking IP address. I'm wondering if either someone is now using it for real?! it now resolves to 82.98.86.175. I started to think i had the wrong url but googl

Re: Images invisible

It may fail for you from home too. I just tried it on my machine and it didn't work. Pinging somesite.com is actually resolving to a real looking IP address. I'm wondering if either someone is now using it for real?! it now resolves to 82.98.86.175. I started to think i had the wrong url but googl

Re: Images invisible

Greg, I feel your pain and have been through similar stuff although probably not that bad. I've said it before, if this stuff was easy then everyone would be doing it. but yeah, you'd think we'd be getting easier not harder over time. My complaints to add to the mix are; - Unit testing is harder

Re: Lots of bind/notify classes

+1 Resharper. That's exactly my process for creating those properties. One day I'll actually write a propOp live template to do the rest of it for me. I think that everytime I create a property... On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Steven Nagy wrote: > I might add, that even if you don’t want to in

Re: Lots of bind/notify classes

+1 Resharper. That's exactly my process for creating those properties. One day I'll actually write a propOp live template to do the rest of it for me. I think that everytime I create a property... On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Steven Nagy wrote: > I might add, that even if you don’t want to in

Re: Images invisible (SOLVED)

Yay me :) I think the setting that does that is related to the Use Local IIS Web server. I do the same, tell it to use IIS. I think if you select a Silverlight unit test project it generates a test page and launches that via the file system path by default. It's fine for a unit test but not for yo

RE: Images invisible (SOLVED)

Yay me :) Hooray you! p.s. you going to Remix next week? I'll be there. If you will be there be good to catch up. (goes for anyone on the list, come say hi!) Not this year, I missed the early bird price and now it would be a bit indulgent to fork out for a ticket. Next week ... I guess

Re: Lots of bind/notify classes

+1 for live templates. I like that it u can use a convention to name ur fields with the camelcase version of ur prop name. The other thing consider is using an expression for the propertychanged method instead of passing a string. That makes refactoring easier. RaisePropertyChanged(()=>Las

Re: Long running animation

>In theory you could have a shared library (basic implementation mind you) That's a utopic theory. Although we like to think that this is a useful thing, the number of portable assemblies is so insignificant that we can't do anything serious. Until that changes, compiling for each runtime is the wa

Re: Long running animation

This Blog post explains it better. In a nutshell, for this to work, your Silverlight assembly can only reference the following ones or other assemblies that are also portable assemblies. : Mscorlib System System.Core System.ComponentModel.Composition Microsoft.VisualBasic When you do a File>New P

Re: Long running animation

Greg, You could probably use a simple DoubleAnimation using an EasingFunction. On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Greg Keogh wrote: > Folks, I want to create a sort of screen saver effect where a shape moves > slowly around a control. The path it follows is calculated at start time by > mixing

Re: Simpler, Flex-style animations?

I've not used it, but I think the Animation Chainerthat Jordan wrote could do the trick. -- Miguel A. Madero Reyes www.miguelmadero.com (blog) m...@miguelmadero.com ___ ozsilv

RE: Long running animation

Coincidentally, I woke up early this morning and I decided to do some "mental health" coding. Just for fun I expanded my proof of concept app from last week to animate more elements and have some configuration controls for size, counts and speed. I'm pleased with the great animation effect produced