Re: Bob Muglias & Steve Balmers statements on committment to Silverlight

2010-11-01 Thread Barry Beattie
just can't see the buy-in from that division to do much with SL and those products. Bye all. Have fun. Barry Beattie On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Chris Anderson wrote: > It's amusing to see how many times Steve Balmer name dropped 'Silverlight' > in his post :).

Re: Hijack: iPhone dev - was RE: Who is using Silverlight?

2010-07-27 Thread Barry Beattie
does this only cover the domestic (U.S) market? or globally? On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:49 PM, .net noobie wrote: > Jailbreaking iPhone Apps Legal – IPhone users can now legally hack their > phones and download applications that are not located in Apple’s apps store, > according to new copyright

Re: RTF in silverlight

2010-05-14 Thread Barry Beattie
just putting on my BA hat for a second I know the service call is spitting out RTF, but why RTF and not, say, PDF? it sounds like you just need to render them, not interact with them. just curious On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Steven Nagy wrote: > Thanks for the various responses. > > > >

Re: Guidance for Moonlight compatibility

2009-12-17 Thread Barry Beattie
I'm also interested in this. > What version details do > we put on the plugin? Can we publish a Moonlight XAP and a Silverlight XAP > and autodetect? Ewww... makes it hard if you're trying to provide a consistant UX... or fall back to a lowest common denominator. 21st century browser wars. Moonl

Re: Merry Xmas from Readify.

2009-12-02 Thread Barry Beattie
good on yer, Scott: can I offer an enhancement idea? Once you get the right angle and force, it's a perfect hit evey time. So... ... vary the parcel (size, shape, weight) to be kicked so re-adjustment of the sliders is required. help the user with the conveyer belt having a weight indicator on i

Re: Our new silverlight site

2009-12-01 Thread Barry Beattie
gt; From: ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com > [mailto:ozsilverlight-boun...@ozsilverlight.com] On Behalf Of Barry > Beattie > Sent: Wednesday, 2 December 2009 10:49 AM > To: ozSilverlight > Subject: Re: Our new silverlight site > >> Abandoning a game on principles is r

Re: Our new silverlight site

2009-12-01 Thread Barry Beattie
> At what point do you draw the line and go "ok, No" is my point ;) by conducting a cost/benifit analysis "we decided to support non-JavaScript users because they represented a significant enough percentage of our user base" bingo. business case to spend the extra development effort in catering

Re: Our new silverlight site

2009-12-01 Thread Barry Beattie
> Abandoning a game on principles is rare dude :) Espec when it comes to that > game. no principles involved. They were sick of Steam continually annoying them. and being broken. And they moved on. It was that simple. There are many more fish (games in this case, product suppliers in general) in

Re: Our new silverlight site

2009-12-01 Thread Barry Beattie
@Scott your mention of Valve software is interesting: both my teens have abandonded Team Fortress because of the obtrusiveness of Steam: broken, obtrusive, no value. They now immese in EVE online: the take-away? don't annoy your customers for the sake of marketing. They have the power to bail. __

Re: Our new silverlight site

2009-12-01 Thread Barry Beattie
@ David Connors haha - well said, sir. the same thing applies to mgt when they want an iPhone app for their banking customers (mostly because of hype). I don't have an iPhone, and only some of my friends do. iPhone: it's just this phone, y'know? ___ ozs

Re: Decision about MS Technologies(s)

2009-07-17 Thread Barry Beattie
how on earth can people take you seriously calling yourself a "Sr. Software Engineer" with questions like that? and on a forum like this? a SILVERLIGHT forum? here's a hint: give up now and sign up for Microsoft's Dynamics CRM 4.0. you'll save a bucket of money getting a turnkey product that will

Re: SQL 'in' Silverlight

2009-07-13 Thread Barry Beattie
latform/OS limitations with using IsolatedStorage? (I'm assuming, and hoping, "no") On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Barry Beattie wrote: > hang on you've lost me completely now... can u guys back up a little? > > is everyone talking about sending SQL/CRUD co

Re: SQL 'in' Silverlight

2009-07-13 Thread Barry Beattie
ubmit my changes the next morning. RIA Services has a > good solution for these problem. > > 2. The working offline scenarios. Google reader is a perfect example, it's > using Gears to allow me to download the content and read offline, when I get > back online it would repl

Re: SQL 'in' Silverlight

2009-07-12 Thread Barry Beattie
yeah, I'm a bit unsure of the usage. if it was a WPF or Adobe AIR app, with reconnect sync of data then I'd understand and appreciate. but in-browser Silverlight... still runs in a browser... which means being online the only thing I can think of is something I've done with Flex and LocalSha

Re: Happy Silverlight / Expression 3 Day all :)

2009-07-12 Thread Barry Beattie
I think Scott is fully aware the situation - he was trying to get his business into a $15,000 Flex 1.5 license only months before Flex2 came out free... so, Scott, remember that pain and don't forget those days - the shoe's on the other foot now... On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Paul Du Bois

Re: Long weekend or Too busy

2009-06-08 Thread Barry Beattie
@John curious: is there a public example of the new Messenger Web Toolkit put to use? Or if not, will there be straight after REMIX? thanx barry.b On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:29 AM, John OBrien wrote: > We are presenting the new Messenger Web Toolkit, they are XHTML controls and > although not

Re: Adaptive streaming

2009-05-18 Thread Barry Beattie
@Ross no UI? does that include no audio level control? On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Ross Jempson wrote: > Hi there, > > > > I was wondering if anyone has implemented a custom media player using > adaptive streaming in a SL client? I have the IIS side up and running, and > have deployed

Re: Blend 3

2009-03-26 Thread Barry Beattie
@Scott mate, this isn't a dig at MS or flag waving for Flex, just a genuine question, mostly for curiousity... your views on what you see the differences are between SL3 and Flex4 beta cycles and their early adopters ... (to pick out two product cycles that you know _something_ about) much diffe

Re: Express Expression (Blend)

2009-01-19 Thread Barry Beattie
@Nick what you say is pretty much echoed by Adobe's recent response http://www.builderau.com.au/news/soa/Adobe-defends-Aussie-CS4-price-hike/0,339028227,339292257,00.htm I threw Aral Balken's comment in there to show that it's a common problem and finger pointing shouldn't just happen to one hig

Re: Express Expression (Blend)

2009-01-19 Thread Barry Beattie
> A personal email from me thanking you for NOT being argumentative like Barry > Beattie :) "argumentative", Scott? a serious inquiry deserves a robust answer. > That being said, in the case of the scenario you presented - the $600 version > applies. see? a robust answe

Re: Express Expression (Blend)

2009-01-19 Thread Barry Beattie
forgive me for paraphrasing that > The $999 version is actually The Expression Professional Subscription - a copy of Expression Studio, - Visual Studio Standard, - Office Standard - Windows XP or Windows Vista Business - Virtual PC - and more > That's actually more than what you'd pay for

Re: SL in Offline World

2009-01-02 Thread Barry Beattie
> I think Scott means office as in work, not office as in MS Office :) mea culpa. I've had my head filled with the Dynamics CRM Offline Client (which is really just an Outlook plug-in). > With the current situation, will Microsoft add links to Moonlight as > prominently as links to the Windows an

Re: SL in Offline World

2009-01-02 Thread Barry Beattie
> We simply aren't experts in the ways of Linux for obvious reason. And Adobe _are_ with the Flash 10 and AIR 1.5 runtimes? it's taken them years to make the Flash player available for Linux - but, hey, they've finally done it. > The > moonlight team are more than competent to handle this charge,

Re: SL in Offline World

2009-01-01 Thread Barry Beattie
> I *think* Shane is talking about Moonlight which is a joint project between > Novell and MS: I'm at a bit of loss why MS needs Novel instead of doing it themselves. something I obviously don't grok @Scott, Miguel, Jonathan the origional poster, Muhammad Niaz, was inquiring about "SL in Offline

Re: SL in Offline World

2008-12-31 Thread Barry Beattie
> Having said that, given MS is supporting Silverlight on MAC they may support > Live Mesh at some point which would allow you to host Silverlight apps on a > MAC desktop within some kind of sand box. to be honest, there's no choice there. if you want reach, then that means all that comes with it

Re: SL in Offline World

2008-12-30 Thread Barry Beattie
> While we've detoured on to Flex, are you aware of any ORMs running in > AS3? I've used the codegen in Flexbuilder a few times, it's not bad in creating value objects, and DTO's to your chosen platform, as well as middleware mapping between client and server, but it's not a true ORM. Not sure wha

Re: SL in Offline World

2008-12-29 Thread Barry Beattie
> Option 2: Use the IE control in a .NET framework, host the app in it > with an internal web server in the background handling the HTTP calls. @Sam, can u expand on that, pls? (thnx). (BTW, any solution I have to look at has to be x-platform) > Personally, I'm probably going to go down the Adobe