Re: [Pacemaker] Is there a way to tell stonithd the job is done ?

2009-05-21 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 03:30:53PM -0700, Joe Armstrong wrote: > I have a small testing cluster that has no stonith devices, I > want to see how reactions occur when node kills are needed and > I was wondering if there was a way to tell stonithd that the > kill has completed (I don't think nul

Re: [Pacemaker] can not handle the failcount for clone resource using crm tool

2009-05-21 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Junko-san, On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 06:32:52PM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote: > Hi, > > I have 4 nodes (dl380g5a, dl380g5b, dl380g5c, dl380g5d), > and run 1 clone resource with the following configuration. > clone_max"="2" > clone_node_max"="1" > > (1) Initial state > dummy:0 dl3

Re: [Pacemaker] OpenAIS vs. Corosync

2009-05-21 Thread Ryan Steele
Well, I'm still not sure what the state of OpenAIS/CoroSync is, but seem to encounter only more problems the farther I dig in to it. Here are the versions of the software packages I'm using: corosync0.92-0ubuntu3 libcorosync-dev 0.92-0ubuntu3 libcorosync20.92-0ubuntu3 li

[Pacemaker] Is there a way to tell stonithd the job is done ?

2009-05-21 Thread Joe Armstrong
I have a small testing cluster that has no stonith devices, I want to see how reactions occur when node kills are needed and I was wondering if there was a way to tell stonithd that the kill has completed (I don't think null stonith will do what I need). In other words, I am getting the messages

Re: [Pacemaker] A few questions

2009-05-21 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 03:09:30PM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote: > Hey folks, > > Been toying with OpenAIS and Pacemaker for a day or two, and I have a few > questions that I couldn't find verbiage on in the documentation, which I > hope some wiser minds might be able to answer. > > 1. Is there

Re: [Pacemaker] PingD Failure-Timeout

2009-05-21 Thread Eliot Gable
I have tried several things with resource constraints and roles (Master, Slave, and Started), but cannot seem to get both of these conditions to be met: - When the master pingd fails, set a negative score to force failing over to the other node - When the failover is complete

[Pacemaker] OpenAIS vs. Corosync

2009-05-21 Thread Ryan Steele
As someone who is just getting acquainted with a world that is no longer just DRBD + Heartbeat, I find myself a bit confused on exactly what I should be using - CoroSync or OpenAIS? I was using OpenAIS + Pacemaker in my first few days of testing, but I then upgraded only to find that the aise

[Pacemaker] DRBD primary/primary

2009-05-21 Thread Nicholas Dronen
Hi: The wiki says that DRBD primary/primary isn't supported yet: http://clusterlabs.org/wiki/DRBD_HowTo_1.0 Is there a workaround? Regards, Nick ___ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/

[Pacemaker] PingD Failure-Timeout

2009-05-21 Thread Eliot Gable
Is there a way to time-out the failure of PingD? In my configuration, I cannot run PingD all the time on every node. Only one node (the master) has public Internet access. I use PingD to cause the master to fail-over to one of the slaves. When a slave becomes master, it then gains public Intern

Re: [Pacemaker] globally-unique clone question

2009-05-21 Thread Eliot Gable
To send in unique information, you will need to create individual instances of each. Then you will need to use location constraints to lock them down to individual nodes. Alternatively, you could re-write the RA so that you can pass it a host-to-parameter mapping string like: name="mydata" val

Re: [Pacemaker] globally-unique clone question

2009-05-21 Thread Joe Armstrong
> -Original Message- > From: Infos E-Blokos [mailto:in...@e-blokos.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 9:16 AM > To: pacema...@clusterlabs.org > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] globally-unique clone question > > > - Original Message - > From: "Eliot Gable" > To: "pacemaker@oss.cluster

Re: [Pacemaker] globally-unique clone question

2009-05-21 Thread Infos E-Blokos
- Original Message - From: "Eliot Gable" To: "pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org" ; "JoeArmstrong" Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 11:39 AM Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] globally-unique clone question The typical usage in this case would be to make all mail servers serve all domains (virtual d

Re: [Pacemaker] globally-unique clone question

2009-05-21 Thread Eliot Gable
The typical usage in this case would be to make all mail servers serve all domains (virtual domain support) and then run N instances across those N servers. Then there is no per-server unique information to deal with. Then you can run, for example, load sharing between the nodes using iptables C

[Pacemaker] globally-unique clone question

2009-05-21 Thread Joe Armstrong
Hi All, I am a little confused about globally-unique clones, since there can be no instance attributes for a clone how do you tell each clone that it is unique ? My use case is that we need to run N instances of a mail server, each mail server is unique in that it serves a specific domain, two

Re: [Pacemaker] can not handle the failcount for clone resource usingcrm tool

2009-05-21 Thread Junko IKEDA
Sorry, There were some wrong explanations. > (4) Now, the failconts for dummy:1 are; > dl380g5c = 1 > dl380g5d = 1 (4) Now, the failconts for dummy:1 are; dl380g5b = 1 dl380g5c = 1 > After set value "0", > The failcount was deleted not only for dl380g5c but also dl38