Re: [Pacemaker] hbagent of pacemaker-mgmt

2009-07-21 Thread Junko IKEDA
Hi, I'm sorry for my delay. I tried the revision 0af0ef92b0fd, (Medium: snmp_subagent: Improved for openais support http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/pygui/rev/0af0ef92b0fd) and it worked well! Many thanks! Regards, Junko On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:32:42 +0900, Yan Gao wrote: > Hi, > On Thu, 20

Re: [Pacemaker] Master/Slave failover during reboot

2009-07-21 Thread Eliot Gable
On another note, what remote power device do you recommend for fencing an UNCLEAN node? -Original Message- From: Eliot Gable [mailto:ega...@broadvox.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 9:40 AM To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Master/Slave failover during reboot Y

Re: [Pacemaker] Master/Slave failover during reboot

2009-07-21 Thread Eliot Gable
Yes, I realized that after upgrading to 1.0.4. When using 1.0.3, when I simply issued a 'reboot' command at the prompt, the node would go offline in UNCLEAN state. With 1.0.4, it just shows as OFFLINE without the UNCLEAN modifier. I am just going to assume that I somehow botched the 1.0.3 instal

Re: [Pacemaker] Master/Slave failover during reboot

2009-07-21 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2009-07-20T15:27:23, Eliot Gable wrote: > I have a resource that is configured as a Master/Slave resource. If I > kill a resource it is dependent on, it properly fails over to the > other node. However, if I reboot the master node, it does not fail > over. What I see is that the master node sw

[Pacemaker] Master/Slave failover during reboot

2009-07-21 Thread Eliot Gable
I have a resource that is configured as a Master/Slave resource. If I kill a resource it is dependent on, it properly fails over to the other node. However, if I reboot the master node, it does not fail over. What I see is that the master node switches to UNCLEAN - Offline, the master resource

Re: [Pacemaker] Master/Slave failover during reboot

2009-07-21 Thread Eliot Gable
I guess I lied. I was running 1.0.3. After upgrading to 1.0.4, I do not seem to have this problem anymore. At least, my first test resulted in exactly what I would expect - the slave took over immediately upon issuing a reboot command on the master. I will run some more tests and if I see it hap