I haven't been able to find any documentation outside of the man pages to help
troubleshoot this, so I've come to the experts...
I'm attempting to setup the following:
Services: NFS and Samba
Filesystems: /mnt/media | /mnt/datusr
Bad news is that Pacemaker on corosync or openais does not appear to work on
fedora/arm. Thankfully, the heartbeat stack appears to work very well. I now
have some (probably basic) configuration hurdles, but I'll ask those in a
separate message.
Thanks for the help.
DJ
From: draperd7...@hotm
The answer is to use configure options to get the different projects to
agree where var is.
Alan
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Alan Jones wrote:
> Ok, hb_report only collects existing logs so it won't help me *get* crmd to
> use the logd.
> However, I am making progress reading the source. I
Ok, hb_report only collects existing logs so it won't help me *get* crmd to
use the logd.
However, I am making progress reading the source. It looks like liblrm is
going to expect
to find sockets under /var/run/heartbeat similar to those under
/var/run/crm.
Anyone have an idea how these are create
Thanks for your replay Mr. Beekhof
Here ist he stack trace:
./CTSlab.py --nodes 'cluster01-node1 cluster01-node2' --benchmark --stack ais
--logfile /var/log/messages --schema pacemaker-1.0 3
Feb 05 20:16:40 Random seed is: 1265397400
Feb 05 20:16:40 BEGINNING 3 TESTS
Feb 05 20:16
Hi,
I'm trying to use the following software together:
cluster-glue-1.0.2-1.fc13.src.rpm
corosync-1.2.0-1.fc13.src.rpm
openais-1.1.2-1.fc13.src.rpm
pacemaker-1.0.5-5.fc13.src.rpm
I'm having trouble with crmd as I wrote earlier:
Feb 4 17:57:42 dd690-42 crmd: [1910]: WARN: lrm_signon: can not initia
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Beekhof"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] impossible to
findagainpacemaker-1.0.5-4.2-x86_64oninternet
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:40 PM, E-Blokos wrote:
Ok Andrew, but imagine if Linus Torvald decides on
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:40 PM, E-Blokos wrote:
>
> Ok Andrew, but imagine if Linus Torvald decides one dya to remove all old
> version of kernel on the net
Linus doesn't keep binary rpms of every kernel ever built either.
And all of our tarballs are all available as:
http://hg.clusterla
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Beekhof"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] impossible to findagainpacemaker-1.0.5-4.2-x86_64on
internet
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:06 PM, E-Blokos wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Andrew Beekho
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Beekhof"
To:
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 8:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] fedora 10 package update from yum
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:06 PM, E-Blokos wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Andrew Beekhof"
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 0
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Raphael Daum wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i'm trying to setup a 2-node-cluster on fedora 12 with
> pacemaker/corosync. the nodes are connected to a shared fc-storage.
>
> basically i'm trying to setup the access to the shared storage via
> clvmd and gfs2:
>
> clvmd reports
Applied (once i resolve some unrelated merge conflicts)
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> a quick batch of patches to the Pacemaker RPM spec:
>
> 1. Fix Heartbeat-only Pacemaker build so that rpmbuild won't try to remove a
> file that is created only when buildin
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Erich Weiler wrote:
>> yes, it does. Thanks for the pointer. I've been not aware that it's
>> possible to have a kind of "standby-ip" where the upper services
>> can bind to without actually getting connection requests.
>
> So you're saying you can have 2 nodes have
Bug was confirmed. :-)
http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2317
Hopefully fix will follow soon.
Regards,
M.
Martin Gombač wrote:
Shoud i file a bug for the problem (restarting resources) described
below?
Regards,
M.
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at
By gum, you're right. I re-scoured the BIND documentation and found this:
interface-interval 1;
Seems to work. Thanks!
I'm still curious if I can get a lsb anonymous clone to restart when an
IP floats over to it, just in case I run into an application that isn't
so versatile... ;)
Dejan M
# HG changeset patch
# User Florian Haas
# Date 1265375339 -3600
# Branch stable-1.0
# Node ID 35eba1386aff888c38b181054c5afcb0f80a2910
# Parent efc54adb199234e3e7fc8c9b5e2cf3b1924e0923
Low: build: introduce "--without esmtp" rpmbuild option
libesmtp-devel is not available in RHEL or CentOS, but
# HG changeset patch
# User Florian Haas
# Date 1265375104 -3600
# Branch stable-1.0
# Node ID efc54adb199234e3e7fc8c9b5e2cf3b1924e0923
# Parent 512ca0b73892df791160264d73d96ee095f613ae
Medium: build: enable --without heartbeat and --without ais as advertised
The package %description talks about
# HG changeset patch
# User Florian Haas
# Date 1265375521 -3600
# Branch stable-1.0
# Node ID 9f9d1d22197dcda845e5d624addfe5159605c14f
# Parent 35eba1386aff888c38b181054c5afcb0f80a2910
Medium: build: add compatibility wrappers for conditional builds in legacy RPM
versions
Legacy versions of RP
Andrew,
a quick batch of patches to the Pacemaker RPM spec:
1. Fix Heartbeat-only Pacemaker build so that rpmbuild won't try to remove a
file that is created only when building for Corosync.
2. Add "--without ais" and "--without heartbeat" conditional build
flags (the %description already a
# HG changeset patch
# User Florian Haas
# Date 1265372627 -3600
# Branch stable-1.0
# Node ID 512ca0b73892df791160264d73d96ee095f613ae
# Parent 6f67420618b0eb52b3e61abc401e9a2cb5dd8dbd
Medium: build: service_crm.so is Corosync only, don't try to remove it if it
wasn't built
diff -r 6f67420618b
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:06 PM, E-Blokos wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Andrew Beekhof"
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 3:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] fedora 10 package update from yum
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:38 PM, E-Blokos wrote:
>>
>> - Original Mess
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:41 AM, wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> The problem does not occur at single ring.
Odd. You might want to report this to the openais guys.
> It is strange that this problem does not happen in Pacemaker1.0.6.
The problem goes away when you just downgrade pacemaker to 1.0.6 (and
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Kirill Stasenkov
wrote:
> Hi i'm new with ha and test some product where pacemaker with corosync
> available.
> Installing next node gives this output to log. Node registered in cluster but
> corosyc shutdown unexpectedly with "shutdown by sysadmin"
> Log in atta
Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2010 13:09:28 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff
>
> wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2010 12:40:24 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
> >> Remind me, which arch is this?
> >> And does it affect both arches?
> >
> > Arch: i386. Well it is
posting just once is enough thankyou.
repeat posting does not increase the chances of a reply.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Jayakrishnan wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Jayakrishnan
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Sir,
>> >
>>
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:06 PM, E-Blokos wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Andrew Beekhof"
> To:
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 4:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] impossible to find
> againpacemaker-1.0.5-4.2-x86_64on internet
>
>
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:29 AM, E-Blok
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Jayakrishnan wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Jayakrishnan
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Sir,
>> >
>> > First of all sorry if I am making a silly question!!!
>> >
>> > My task is to configure a 2 node u
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Koch, Sebastian
wrote:
> Hi, thanks for your answer.
>
> There is only the script running:
>
> 8435 ? Ss 0:00 \_ sshd: r...@pts/0
> 8437 pts/0 Ss 0:00 | \_ -bash
> 8459 pts/0 S+ 0:00 | \_ /usr/bin/python ./CTSlab.py --nodes
>
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:29 AM, jimbob palmer wrote:
> 2010/2/4 Andrew Beekhof :
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:12 PM, jimbob palmer wrote:
>>> Forcing the architecture gets an install:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> # lsb_release -a
>>> LSB Version:
>>> :core-3.1-amd64:core-3.1-ia32:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff
wrote:
> Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2010 12:40:24 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
>> Remind me, which arch is this?
>> And does it affect both arches?
>
> Arch: i386. Well it is running on a virtualbox now.
> No x64 at hand at the moment.
Can't you just
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:11:08PM -0800, Alan Jones wrote:
> I'm trying to run with corosync 1.2.0 and pacemaker 1.0.5 and get the
> following repeatedly in /var/log/messages:
>
> Feb 4 17:57:42 dd690-42 crmd: [1910]: WARN: lrm_signon: can not initiate
> connection
> Feb 4 17:57:42 dd690-4
Hello,
> > As show below, just dumping the current configuration to a file, and
> > loading it again, fails.
>
> Please file a bugzilla report with hb_report. Thanks for catching
> this.
Ok, this is bug #2336
> > - how can I convert a file containing crm cli commands to an xml
> > cib file ?
>
Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2010 12:40:24 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
> Remind me, which arch is this?
> And does it affect both arches?
Arch: i386. Well it is running on a virtualbox now.
No x64 at hand at the moment.
Greetings,
--
Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
MultiNET Services GmbH
Addresse: Bretonischer
Remind me, which arch is this?
And does it affect both arches?
Because something is very very wrong if you're getting:
Feb 4 21:22:22 debian2 corosync[6221]: [pcmk ] info: pcmk_ipc:
Recorded connection 0x8e8b370 for crmd/6235
Feb 4 21:22:22 debian2 corosync[6221]: [pcmk ] info: pcmk_ipc:
Just for the record: heartbeat (3.0.2) was not able to recover either.
It also manages to see a failure on the dead node but fails to recover.
Regards
Dominik
___
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/l
hi all,
i'm trying to setup a 2-node-cluster on fedora 12 with
pacemaker/corosync. the nodes are connected to a shared fc-storage.
basically i'm trying to setup the access to the shared storage via
clvmd and gfs2:
clvmd reports
# clvmd -V
Cluster LVM daemon version: 2.02.53(1) (2009-09-25)
Prot
Regarding that high load problem:
This should be addresses by the system health feature that was / will be
introduced into pacemaker. There are two problems in the order if relevance:
- Problem of automatic failback not solved. See bug 2269 in bugzilla.
- There are very little system health agent
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 08:59:50AM +0100, Dominik Klein wrote:
> > But generally I believe this test case is invalid.
>
> I might agree here that this test case does not necessarily reproduce
> what happened on my production system (unfortunately I do not know for
> sure what happened there,
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff
wrote:
> Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2010 12:03:44 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
>
>> Nothing there looks even remotely relevant.
>> Its also highly unlikely that I managed to make a change that
>> resurrected the exact same symptom from 1.0.5 (which I a
Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2010 12:03:44 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
> Nothing there looks even remotely relevant.
> Its also highly unlikely that I managed to make a change that
> resurrected the exact same symptom from 1.0.5 (which I also did
> nothing to actually fix - except add logging thats not been
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:35:31AM -0800, Erich Weiler wrote:
> I think I read about this somehwere, but I can't find it now... I
> have a cloned service on two nodes that is always running on both
> (named, one is a replicated slave). The IP sticks to one, then
> floats to the other if the
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Beekhof"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 4:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] impossible to find
againpacemaker-1.0.5-4.2-x86_64on internet
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:29 AM, E-Blokos wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Andrew Beekho
Hi, thanks for your answer.
There is only the script running:
8435 ?Ss 0:00 \_ sshd: r...@pts/0
8437 pts/0Ss 0:00 | \_ -bash
8459 pts/0S+ 0:00 | \_ /usr/bin/python ./CTSlab.py --nodes
cluster01-node1 cluster01-node2 --benchmark --stack ais --logfile
/var
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2010 13:58:45 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff
> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I just installed the new packages from madkiss on a completely new
>> > installed len
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Jayakrishnan
> wrote:
> >
> > Sir,
> >
> > First of all sorry if I am making a silly question!!!
> >
> > My task is to configure a 2 node ubuntu cluster with postgres database
> > replication. I have complete
2010/2/4 Andrew Beekhof :
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:12 PM, jimbob palmer wrote:
>> Forcing the architecture gets an install:
>
> [snip]
>
>> # lsb_release -a
>> LSB Version:
>> :core-3.1-amd64:core-3.1-ia32:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.1-amd64:graphics-3.1-ia32:graphics-3.1-noarch
>
> That looks li
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:29 AM, E-Blokos wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Andrew Beekhof"
> To:
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 2:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] impossible to find again
> pacemaker-1.0.5-4.2-x86_64on internet
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 6:52 AM, E-Bloko
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Beekhof"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 2:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] impossible to find again
pacemaker-1.0.5-4.2-x86_64on internet
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 6:52 AM, E-Blokos wrote:
Hi,
on all mirrors, example
http://mirror.etf.bg
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Beekhof"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 2:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker-libs
You mean like:
http://clusterlabs.org/rpm/fedora-10/
perhaps?
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:42 AM, E-Blokos wrote:
Hi,
is there any link for pacema
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Beekhof"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 2:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker-libs
You mean like:
http://clusterlabs.org/rpm/fedora-10/
perhaps?
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:42 AM, E-Blokos wrote:
Hi,
is there any link for pacema
> But generally I believe this test case is invalid.
I might agree here that this test case does not necessarily reproduce
what happened on my production system (unfortunately I do not know for
sure what happened there, the dev who caused this just tells me he used
some stupid sql statement and ev
51 matches
Mail list logo
