On 2011-02-14 22:37, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
Andrew Beekhof @ 14/02/2011 05:44 -0300 dixit:
-Is still the case that Heartbeat is not to be considered for new
deployments ? (I read something along that line)
pretty much
Hi all,
We test trouble at the time of the start of the Master/Slave resource.
Step1) We start the first node and send cib.
Last updated: Thu Feb 10 16:32:12 2011
Stack: Heartbeat
Current DC: srv01 (c7435833-8bc5-43aa-8195-c666b818677f) - partition with quorum
Version:
Hi,
snip
Is there a searchable repository of the list content so I may find
if some of my doubts are already explained ?
Answering myself, I found that this (and some related lists) are archived
and indexed at GossamerThreads,
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha
I usually
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz t...@huapi.ba.ar wrote:
Andrew Beekhof @ 14/02/2011 05:44 -0300 dixit:
-Is still the case that Heartbeat is not to be considered for new
deployments ? (I read something along that line)
pretty much
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:32 AM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi all,
We test trouble at the time of the start of the Master/Slave resource.
Step1) We start the first node and send cib.
Last updated: Thu Feb 10 16:32:12 2011
Stack: Heartbeat
Current DC: srv01
Andrew Beekhof @ 15/02/2011 04:25 -0300 dixit:
For what I understand, you want the brains of the action at pacemaker,
so VRRP, HSRP or (U)CARP seem more a trouble than a solution.
(i.e. twin head) right ?
In other words, it seems to better align with the solution idea to
have pacemaker decide
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comment.
Perhaps I misunderstood - does the node fail _while_ we're running
post_notify_start_0?
Is that the ordering you're talking about?
Yes.
I think that stonith do not have to wait for post_notify_start_0 of the
inoperative node.
If so, then the crmd is
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:01 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comment.
Perhaps I misunderstood - does the node fail _while_ we're running
post_notify_start_0?
Is that the ordering you're talking about?
Yes.
I think that stonith do not have to wait for
Hi,
the packages from rpm-next(64bit) for opensuse 11.3 do not install there (at
least true for 1.1.4 and 1.1.5).
The plugin is in
./usr/lib/lcrso/pacemaker.lcrso
but should be in
./usr/lib64/lcrso/pacemaker.lcrso
I think the patch below (borrowed from the 'official' packages) cures.
Regards
Dear Mailing List:
My company is investigating the use Pacemaker/Corosync and would like to create
a proof of concept. We need professional services from a hands-on developer
with detailed knowledge of Pacemaker/Corosync, Linux scripting experience, and
general knowledge of the Linux OS.
Hi allI think there is something wrong with cluster communication,result in
node reboot. so I want to use disk heartbeating, I use corosync-1.2.2-1.1.el5
and pacemaker-1.0.9.1-1.el5.is there any guide tell me how to realize disk
heartbeating with corosync and pacemaker?Thanks a lot
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz t...@huapi.ba.arwrote:
Andrew Beekhof @ 15/02/2011 04:25 -0300 dixit:
For what I understand, you want the brains of the action at pacemaker,
so VRRP, HSRP or (U)CARP seem more a trouble than a solution.
(i.e. twin head) right ?
In other
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Dan Frincu df.clus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz t...@huapi.ba.arwrote:
Andrew Beekhof @ 15/02/2011 04:25 -0300 dixit:
For what I understand, you want the brains of the action at pacemaker,
so VRRP, HSRP or (U)CARP
13 matches
Mail list logo
