On 12/14/2011 02:57 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 04:18:33PM +0800, Gao,Yan wrote:
On 12/13/11 04:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Gao,Yan wrote:
On 12/12/11 17:52, Florian Haas wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Gao,Yan wrote:
On 12/1
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 04:18:33PM +0800, Gao,Yan wrote:
> On 12/13/11 04:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Gao,Yan wrote:
> >> On 12/12/11 17:52, Florian Haas wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Gao,Yan wrote:
> On 12/12/11 17:16, Florian Haas wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 05:36:12PM +0800, Gao,Yan wrote:
> On 12/12/11 17:16, Florian Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Gao,Yan wrote:
> >> On 12/12/11 15:55, Gao,Yan wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> As some people have noticed, we've provided a new feature "Resource
> >>> templates" si
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 11:38:22AM +0200, Dan Frincu wrote:
> Hi,
>
[...]
> > Just tried it out, and when I do :set filetype=pcmk, vim spews at
> > me this:
> >
> > Error detected while processing /usr/share/vim/vim72/syntax/synload.vim:
> > line 58:
> > E127: Cannot redefine function 3_SynSet:
Hi Andrew, all,
I'm now testing latest changes in git, everything goes much cleaner then
a week ago, I'll (hopefully) make report later.
One feature came into mind during testing:
Imagine resource which was tried to be started on all nodes and failed
everywhere.
Then administrator changes resourc
Hello Serge
2011/12/13 Serge Dubrouski :
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Takatoshi MATSUO
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> 2011/12/12 Serge Dubrouski :
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Attila
>> >>
>> >> 2011/12/8 Attila Megyeri :
>> >>
Hi Yuusuke,
On 12/13/11 16:34, Yuusuke Iida wrote:
> Hi, Yan
>
> (2011/10/31 20:50), Yuusuke Iida wrote:
>> I read a cord of pengine.
>> By all appearance, as for the resource becoming "unmanaged failed", an
>> allotment does not seem to be performed.
>> Is the recognition that an allotment is no
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Qiu Zhigang wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dan Frincu [mailto:df.clus...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 4:43 PM
>> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
>> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] How to live migrate the kvm vm
>>
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Frincu [mailto:df.clus...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 4:43 PM
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] How to live migrate the kvm vm
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Qiu Zhigang
> wrote:
>
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Qiu Zhigang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you, you are right, I correct the 'allow-migrate="true"', but now I
> found another problem when migrate, migrate failed.
> The following is the log.
>
> Dec 13 12:10:03 h10_151 kernel: type=1400 audit(1323749403.251:623): a
Hi, Yan
(2011/10/31 20:50), Yuusuke Iida wrote:
I read a cord of pengine.
By all appearance, as for the resource becoming "unmanaged failed", an
allotment does not seem to be performed.
Is the recognition that an allotment is not performed as for the
"unmanaged failed" resource that failed in st
On 12/13/11 04:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Gao,Yan wrote:
>> On 12/12/11 17:52, Florian Haas wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Gao,Yan wrote:
On 12/12/11 17:16, Florian Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Gao,Yan wrote:
>> On 1
12 matches
Mail list logo
