[Pacemaker] A VirtualDomain resource is deleted immediatly after create.

2012-09-10 Thread Changlimin
Hi; I create some VirtualDomain resources VMwindows-moban-7 and VMwindows-moban-6. I cannot see VMwindows-moban-7 when do crm status. In the syslog, the VMwindows-moban-7 is deleted immediatly after create. OS: ubuntu 12.04 server LTS. Sep 7 09:39:23 server1 cib: [7823]: debug:

[Pacemaker] [Problem] About the replacement of the master/slave resource.

2012-09-10 Thread renayama19661014
Hi All, We confirmed movement of the trouble of the clone resource that we combined with Master/Slave resource. The master / slave resources are replaced under the influence of the trouble of the clonal resource. We confirmed it in the next procedure. Step1) We start a cluster and send cib.

Re: [Pacemaker] Upgrading to Pacemaker 1.1.7. Issue: sticky resources failing back after reboot

2012-09-10 Thread Parshvi
David Vossel dvossel@... writes: Hi, We have upgraded pacemaker version 1.0.12 to 1.1.7 The upgrade was done since resources failed to recover after a timeout (monitor|stop[unmanaged]) and logs observed are: WARN: print_graph: Synapse 6 is pending (priority: 0) Sep 03 16:55:18

Re: [Pacemaker] fencing best practices for virtual environments

2012-09-10 Thread Alberto Menichetti
On 09/09/2012 09:53 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: On 2012-09-09T13:30:36, Alberto Menichettialbmeniche...@tai.it wrote: I've successfully configured and tested the stonith plugin external/vcenter; but this plugin introduces a single point of failure in my cluster infrastructure because it

Re: [Pacemaker] Clustered LVM in failover cluster

2012-09-10 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-09-10T11:06:15, David Morton davidmorto...@gmail.com wrote: Not directly Pacemaker related but a simple question for those who manage clusters ... I'm recreating our failover cluster on a new SAN which will use cLVM and XFS, I am after some clarification that the --clustered y

Re: [Pacemaker] fencing best practices for virtual environments

2012-09-10 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-09-10T10:45:30, Alberto Menichetti albmeniche...@tai.it wrote: thank you for the quick response. Maybe SPOF is not the best definition, but when the vcenter is unavailable the safety of my data is not guaranteed. The safety remains guaranteed; the availability of your service wouldn't

[Pacemaker] HealthCPU

2012-09-10 Thread Hanie Maghsoudy
Dear all, I want to add the possibility for pacemaker to move my master server in case of high CPU load. I guess that adding a primitive ocf:pacemaker:HealthCPU would do that; however, I do not have a clue about either the mechanism or configuration of it. I did read this

Re: [Pacemaker] HealthCPU

2012-09-10 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Dear all, I want to add the possibility for pacemaker to move my master server in case of high CPU load. I guess that adding a primitive ocf:pacemaker:HealthCPU would do that; however, I do not have a clue about either the mechanism or configuration of it. I did read this

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.6 order possible bug ?

2012-09-10 Thread Tomáš Vavřička
On 09/06/2012 07:41 AM, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: On 09/05/2012 04:54 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi, On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:09:15PM +0200, Tomáš Vavřička wrote: On 09/05/2012 11:44 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 07:51:35AM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, Sep 3,

Re: [Pacemaker] fencing best practices for virtual environments

2012-09-10 Thread Alberto Menichetti
On 09/10/2012 12:15 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: On 2012-09-10T10:45:30, Alberto Menichettialbmeniche...@tai.it wrote: thank you for the quick response. Maybe SPOF is not the best definition, but when the vcenter is unavailable the safety of my data is not guaranteed. The safety remains

Re: [Pacemaker] fencing best practices for virtual environments

2012-09-10 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-09-10T14:40:43, Alberto Menichetti albmeniche...@tai.it wrote: Sorry, maybe I'm missing something, but suppose this scenario (also remember that, being a 2-node cluster, I had to set no-quorum-policy=ignore): 1. the virtual center is unavailable 2. an event occurs that partition the

Re: [Pacemaker] CRM CLI guide gone?

2012-09-10 Thread Andreas Ntaflos
On 10/09/12 00:15, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Andreas Ntaflos d...@pseudoterminal.org wrote: It seems the CRM CLI guide formally found under http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/crm_cli.html is gone (404). Why so? Has it moved somewhere else? Yes. The shell has its

Re: [Pacemaker] Master/Slave drbd setup not working as expected

2012-09-10 Thread Jake Smith
- Original Message - From: Luca Meron ckslxpc...@hotmail.it To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 12:39:30 PM Subject: [Pacemaker] Master/Slave drbd setup not working as expected Hi. I've a simple config with

Re: [Pacemaker] Master/Slave drbd setup not working as expected

2012-09-10 Thread Luca Meron
Firewall:slave cannot run on a different node. I assume you are trying to have the DRBD masters on the same node? That should be something like: colocation FirewallDiskWithWork inf: Firewall:Master Config:Master that is! thanks ___

Re: [Pacemaker] CRM CLI guide gone?

2012-09-10 Thread Nenad Opsenica
On 09/10/2012 06:26 PM, Andreas Ntaflos wrote: On 10/09/12 00:15, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Andreas Ntaflos d...@pseudoterminal.org wrote: It seems the CRM CLI guide formally found under http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/crm_cli.html is gone (404). Why so? Has it

Re: [Pacemaker] Clustered LVM in failover cluster

2012-09-10 Thread David Morton
So if we do not use clustered VG's will any changes made to a shared disk (non clustered filesystem) be visible to all cluster nodes ? Or does activating the VG resource effectively 'refresh' the LVM layout prior to any filesystem actions taking place in the event of a failover ? We will have one

Re: [Pacemaker] Clustered LVM in failover cluster

2012-09-10 Thread emmanuel segura
I worked in Redhat Cluster without clvmd, i did a storage migration where the service was running. Until this point everythig was fine, but when the primary node where the service was running crashed it, the secondary node used the old luns, this happened because nobody synchronized the lvm

Re: [Pacemaker] CRM CLI guide gone?

2012-09-10 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-09-10T22:15:44, Nenad Opsenica ne...@vtkom.com wrote: Really, what is the status of CRM shell? Is it deprecated now? It grew big enough to become it's own project. It is very much supported by Dejan and other contributors. What is official way of configuring Peacemaker? If you want

Re: [Pacemaker] Clustered LVM in failover cluster

2012-09-10 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-09-11T08:26:28, David Morton davidmorto...@gmail.com wrote: So if we do not use clustered VG's will any changes made to a shared disk (non clustered filesystem) be visible to all cluster nodes ? Or does activating the VG resource effectively 'refresh' the LVM layout prior to any

Re: [Pacemaker] A VirtualDomain resource is deleted immediatly after create.

2012-09-10 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Changlimin changli...@h3c.com wrote: Hi; I create some VirtualDomain resources VMwindows-moban-7 and VMwindows-moban-6. I cannot see VMwindows-moban-7 when do crm status. In the syslog, the VMwindows-moban-7 is deleted immediatly after create.

Re: [Pacemaker] Possible bug?

2012-09-10 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Borislav Borisov borislav.v.bori...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I am experiencing a very strange issue. On two test boxes I have a setup that should server NFS and iSCSI Targets (SCST). When I create couple of iSCSI Target groups, composed of Target/Lun, and I