ok, the split brain condition has been resolved.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
On 10/17/2012 12:58 AM, Soni Maula Harriz wrote:
and when i restart drbd service on node 2, i found this message :
[root@cluster2 ~]# service drbd restart
Stopping all DRBD
i succesfully created gfs2 filesystem on cluster1, the failure only happen
to cluster2
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Soni Maula Harriz
soni.har...@sangkuriang.co.id wrote:
ok, the split brain condition has been resolved.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
Please see here:
https://github.com/feist/pcs/issues
Andreas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Chris Feist [mailto:cfe...@redhat.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Oktober 2012 02:03
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Cc: linux clustering
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Announce: pcs-0.9.26
I've been having a problem with the lvm ra when used in conjunction with clvm
when a node dies (eg when I destroy the vm to test this particular scenario)
clvm re-organises itself just fine, and comes good well within the lvm ra
timeout I set (60 seconds), but if the vgdisplay -v vg-drbd
Le 17/10/2012 11:56, Mia Lueng a écrit :
group rg_apache2 res_apache res_ip_apache \
meta target-role=Started
order rg_apache_order : res_ip_apache res_apache
It seems not correct. A group is already a shortcut for an ordered
collocation. Either use collocation+ordering, or a group,
Please paste your cluster.conf file and the output from 'cat
/proc/drbd'. Also, did you configure and test stonith/fencing?
digimer
On 10/17/2012 03:42 AM, Soni Maula Harriz wrote:
ok, it's done. i can now create gfs2 filesystem in cluster2, by following
configuration here
On 2012-10-17T14:03:16, Florian Crouzat gen...@floriancrouzat.net wrote:
Le 17/10/2012 11:56, Mia Lueng a écrit :
group rg_apache2 res_apache res_ip_apache \
meta target-role=Started
order rg_apache_order : res_ip_apache res_apache
It seems not correct. A group is already a shortcut
- Original Message -
From: Richard \Alan\ McAlexander alanmac1...@gmail.com
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 7:23:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Unable to add ping resource to pacemaker
1.0.12
Hi Jake,
Hi,
A simple question for a simple 2-nodes cluster running
pacemaker-1.0.9, corosync-1.2.1 (Debian/Squeeze):
will the online node stonith the other standby node if I stop the
cluster services on it? (I need to open the chassis)
thanks!
jf
___
On 10/17/2012 02:10 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hi,
A simple question for a simple 2-nodes cluster running
pacemaker-1.0.9, corosync-1.2.1 (Debian/Squeeze):
will the online node stonith the other standby node if I stop the
cluster services on it? (I need to open the chassis)
* Digimer li...@alteeve.ca [20121017 14:21]:
On 10/17/2012 02:10 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hi,
A simple question for a simple 2-nodes cluster running
pacemaker-1.0.9, corosync-1.2.1 (Debian/Squeeze):
will the online node stonith the other standby node if I stop the
cluster
That's gotten me a little closer. I'm a bit of a newb when it comes to
Pacemaker, on that note, I put the first group of your post (and changed
the options to match the network I'm working on, I put this first
configuration on the line with the existing group that I have setup.
That group has
Great.
Of course I will test it. We are especially interested in the gui.
Thanks
Andreas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Chris Feist [mailto:cfe...@redhat.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Oktober 2012 21:22
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Cc: Grüninger, Andreas (LGL Extern);
We're changing our SAN shortly and I'm putting together the procedure /
config now for the shared storage. This will be based on XFS on top of
clustered LVM2 via Pacemaker.
I've implemented the exclusive=yes directive on the LVM resources (volume
groups) but I am still able to mount on both
- Original Message -
From: Richard \Alan\ McAlexander alanmac1...@gmail.com
To: Jake Smith jsm...@argotec.com, The Pacemaker cluster
resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:21:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Unable to add ping resource to
What about this instead?
diff --git a/crmd/heartbeat.c b/crmd/heartbeat.c
index cae143b..3a7f31d 100644
--- a/crmd/heartbeat.c
+++ b/crmd/heartbeat.c
@@ -354,14 +354,13 @@ crmd_ccm_msg_callback(oc_ed_t event, void
*cookie, size_t size, const void *data
if (update_quorum) {
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:21:24 -0400 Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
On 10/17/2012 02:10 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hi,
A simple question for a simple 2-nodes cluster running
pacemaker-1.0.9, corosync-1.2.1 (Debian/Squeeze):
will the online node stonith the other standby node
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
Even your correction is good, but one place of correction is necessary.
#if SUPPORT_HEARTBEAT
-static gboolean fsa_have_quorum = FALSE;
gboolean ccm_dispatch(int fd, gpointer user_data)
{
@@ -575,14 +574,14 @@
if(update_quorum) {
Good catch!
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:33 AM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
Even your correction is good, but one place of correction is necessary.
#if SUPPORT_HEARTBEAT
-static gboolean fsa_have_quorum = FALSE;
gboolean ccm_dispatch(int fd,
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Arnold Krille arn...@arnoldarts.de wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 14:21:24 -0400 Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
On 10/17/2012 02:10 PM, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hi,
A simple question for a simple 2-nodes cluster running
pacemaker-1.0.9, corosync-1.2.1
I just set one order rule:
order rg_apache_order : res_ip_apache res_apache
You mean the rule
group rg_apache2 res_apache res_ip_apache \
meta target-role=Started
also indicates an order rule ?
2012/10/17 Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com:
On 2012-10-17T14:03:16, Florian Crouzat
(Sorry for the top post)Yes... Groups are a syntactical shortcut for order and collocation statements. Resources in a group are ordered in the sequence they are written and collocated in reverse. HTHJakeFrom: Mia Lueng Sent: Wed, 17/10/2012 09:17 PMTo: The Pacemaker cluster
This is your resource:
Current DC: NONE
All the crm configure commands try to talk to the DC, and you don't have one.
Normally one would be elected quite quickly, you may have a
network/filewall issue.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Lonni J Friedman netll...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm running
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
Please paste your cluster.conf file
?xml version=1.0?
cluster config_version=1 name=cluster
logging debug=off/
clusternodes
clusternode name=cluster1 nodeid=1
fence
method name=pcmk-redirect
device
24 matches
Mail list logo