24.06.2013 04:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Either people have given up on testing, or rc5[1] is looking good for the
> final release.
Is it going to be 1.1.10 or 1.2.0 (2.0.0)?
>
> So just a reminder, we're particularly looking for feedback in the following
> areas:
>
> | plugin-based clusters
Hi Andrew
2013/6/24 Andrew Beekhof :
>
> On 24/06/2013, at 12:46 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew
>>
>> I received similar error using 6ea4b7e(HEAD) under RHEL6.
>> -
>> # export WITH='--without cman --without heartbeat'; make rpm-dep
>> (snip)
>> --> Finished Dependency Resolut
On 24/06/2013, at 12:46 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> I received similar error using 6ea4b7e(HEAD) under RHEL6.
> -
> # export WITH='--without cman --without heartbeat'; make rpm-dep
> (snip)
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Package: clusterlib-3.0.12.1-32.el6
Hi Andrew
I received similar error using 6ea4b7e(HEAD) under RHEL6.
-
# export WITH='--without cman --without heartbeat'; make rpm-dep
(snip)
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: clusterlib-3.0.12.1-32.el6.x86_64 (sl)
Requires: libconfdb.so.4(COROSYNC_CONFDB_1.0)(6
Either people have given up on testing, or rc5[1] is looking good for the final
release.
So just a reminder, we're particularly looking for feedback in the following
areas:
| plugin-based clusters, ACLs, the new –ban and –clear commands, and admin
actions
| (such as moving and stopping resour
On 21/06/2013, at 5:38 PM, Thibaut Pouzet
wrote:
> Le 20/06/2013 12:23, Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
>> On 20/06/2013, at 6:51 PM, Thibaut Pouzet
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Le 19/06/2013 23:57, Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
On 20/06/2013, at 1:57 AM, Thibaut Pouzet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>>
On 22/06/2013, at 5:13 AM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> my two cents to your questions:
>
> a) If you want to learn most, take any distro and compile the components from
> source and afterwards use them. => Most learned.
Well, yes, but not always about clustering and not always thi
