On 17/09/2013, at 4:30 PM, Саша Александров wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Sorry, here it is:
> [root@premium2 ~]# ls -la /var/lib/pacemaker/cib
> total 204
> drwxrwxr-x. 2 hacluster haclient 4096 Jul 21 22:04 .
> drwxr-x---. 6 root root 4096 Jul 14 18:02 ..
> -rw--- 1 hacluster root
On 19/09/2013, at 2:13 AM, Radoslaw Garbacz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding the "monitor" operation on disabled nodes.
>
> I noticed that this operation is called even, when an agent is disabled for a
> node. Is it an indented behavior
Yes. We have to check the resource's stat
On 19/09/2013, at 8:25 AM, David Lang wrote:
> I have been using heartbeat for many years, but am now setting up some new
> clusters with pacemaker/corosync. I'm not sure which component is having
> problems so I'm sending to both lists.
>
> These are two machine clusters, configured per the
You might need -R
On 19/09/2013, at 2:54 AM, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hallo Andreas,
>
> thank you for your reply.
> I use 1.1.11-git.
>
> What I did: I put one node down (servive pacemaker stop) and then
> execute a crm_simulate -Ls -u node and I only see the output
> as said before. When I brin
On 12/09/2013, at 11:58 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2013/9/12 Eloy Coto Pereiro :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for your help, I use the same example. In this case Kamailio need to
>> start after postgresql. But this is not a problem I think, the replication
>> work ok without corosync. I stop
On 18/09/13 22:58, Aarti Sawant wrote:
> hello,
>
> I am new to HA, i am trying to create HA on centos 6.4 LXC container
> I have install pacemaker corosync on container and trying to create a
> cluster.
> contents of /etc/corosync/corosync.conf
>
> compatibility: whitetank
>
> totem {
>
hello,
I am new to HA, i am trying to create HA on centos 6.4 LXC container
I have install pacemaker corosync on container and trying to create a
cluster.
contents of /etc/corosync/corosync.conf
compatibility: whitetank
totem {
version: 2
secauth: off
threads: 0
i
I have been using heartbeat for many years, but am now setting up some new
clusters with pacemaker/corosync. I'm not sure which component is having
problems so I'm sending to both lists.
These are two machine clusters, configured per the RHEL quickstart on
clusterlabs.org
I'm frequently runn
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> > I'm still a bit unclear on how the cluster monitors the VIP resources.
>
> > Do I have exactly one stanza of totem interface, and set the bindnetaddr
> to
>
> > the heartbeat net?
>
> > How does the cluster monitor for a VIP on a d
Hallo Andreas,
thank you for your reply.
I use 1.1.11-git.
What I did: I put one node down (servive pacemaker stop) and then
execute a crm_simulate -Ls -u node and I only see the output
as said before. When I bring up the node in reality pacemaker
is moving resources to that node. The output of c
Allen:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Allen Pomeroy wrote:
> Why don't you consider something like OpenBSD's packet filter (pf),
> pfsync, and CARP? That would provide a better (hitless) HA solution for
> firewalls. I also use fwbuilder.org to graphically manage the firewall
> rules.
I am
Am Mittwoch, 18. September 2013, 13:34:55 schrieb Jeff Weber:
> I am looking to create a 2-node Active/Passive firewall cluster. I am an
> experienced Linux user, but new to HA clusters. I have scanned "Clusters
> From Scratch" and "Pacemaker Explained". I found these docs helpful, but a
> bit o
Am Mittwoch, 18. September 2013, 14:55:21 schrieb Jeff Weber:
> Michael:
>
> Thanks. That helps me move forward.
(...)
> I'm still a bit unclear on how the cluster monitors the VIP resources.
> Do I have exactly one stanza of totem interface, and set the bindnetaddr to
> the heartbeat net?
> How d
On 2013-09-18 16:26, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I take an example from Internet without monitor... Do you have a
> suggestion ?
There are a lot of examples ... like this one http://goo.gl/ZfKZeq
Regards,
Andreas
--
Need help with Pacemaker?
http://www.hastexo.com/now
>
> Best reg
Michael:
Thanks. That helps me move forward.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> **
>
> Am Mittwoch, 18. September 2013, 13:34:55 schrieb Jeff Weber:
>
> > How many interfaces should each cluster node have?
>
> > 2 interfaces: internal, external
>
> > or
>
> > 3 inte
Why don't you consider something like OpenBSD's packet filter (pf),
pfsync, and CARP? That would provide a better (hitless) HA solution for
firewalls. I also use fwbuilder.org to graphically manage the firewall
rules. The best use for a cluster is services that can take a hit while
the clust
I am looking to create a 2-node Active/Passive firewall cluster. I am an
experienced Linux user, but new to HA clusters. I have scanned "Clusters
>From Scratch" and "Pacemaker Explained". I found these docs helpful, but a
bit overwhelming, being new to HA clusters.
My goals:
* create 2-node Act
Hi,
Seems like 'ocf_is_probe' is the right call in my case.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-09-18T11:13:46, Radoslaw Garbacz <
> radoslaw.garb...@xtremedatainc.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a question regarding the "monitor" operation on disabled no
Sorry for not being specific.
The agent is meant to run only on a specific node (the head), and by
constraints is disabled on all other nodes.
'pcs constraint' reports:
Location Constraints:
Resource: dbx_nfs_head
Enabled on: ip-10-138-14-225
Disabled on: ip-10-151-14-34 ip-10-238-146-5
On 2013-09-18T11:13:46, Radoslaw Garbacz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding the "monitor" operation on disabled nodes.
>
> I noticed that this operation is called even, when an agent is disabled for
> a node. Is it an indented behavior or is there something wrong with my
> configurat
Hi,
I have a question regarding the "monitor" operation on disabled nodes.
I noticed that this operation is called even, when an agent is disabled for
a node. Is it an indented behavior or is there something wrong with my
configuration?
Another question is, if it is intended, whether there is an
On 2013-09-18 16:56, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I updated ping-gateway like this but nothing change...
Hmm ... well, there is still no monitor operation you only added some
more attributes.
Try:
crm configure monitor ping-gateway 20
... or the equivalent in your preferred cluster manag
Hello,
I updated ping-gateway like this but nothing change...
type="ping">
name="host_list" value="192.168.1.1"/>
name="multiplier" value="1000"/>
name="depth" value="0"/>
name="timeout" value="20s"/>
name="interval
Hello,
I take an example from Internet without monitor... Do you have a
suggestion ?
Best regards.
Francis
On 09/18/2013 03:54 PM, Andreas Kurz wrote:
On 2013-09-18 15:44, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
Hello Andreas,
I do not see what is wrong in my config.
You have no "monitor" operation defin
Hello Andreas,
I am testing serveur upgrade, I have one node with FC18
(pacemaker-1.1.9-0.1.70ad9fa.git.fc18.i686) and the other FC17
(pacemaker-1.1.7-2.fc17.i686).
Best regards.
Francis
On 09/18/2013 03:44 PM, Andreas Kurz wrote:
On 2013-09-18 15:08, Andreas Mock wrote:
Hi all,
really n
On 2013-09-18 15:44, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
> Hello Andreas,
>
> I do not see what is wrong in my config.
You have no "monitor" operation defined for your "ping-gateway"
resource, so in fact it does never execute the connectivity check but
only updates the "pingd" attriute value once on start.
Re
Hello Andreas,
I do not see what is wrong in my config.
validate-with="pacemaker-1.2" crm_feature_set="3.0.6"
update-origin="noeud2.apec.fr" update-client="cibadmin"
cib-last-written="Sat Sep 14 10:53:58 2013" have-quorum="1" dc-uuid="2">
value="1.1.7-2.fc17-ee0730e13d1
On 2013-09-18 15:08, Andreas Mock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> really nobody here with deeper experience of crm_simulate?
> Or with a hint for good documentation?
What Pacemaker version are you using? I did a quick test here on older
1.1.6 and 1.1.7 clusters and they show a nice output on "crm_simulate
-
Hi all,
really nobody here with deeper experience of crm_simulate?
Or with a hint for good documentation?
Best regards
Andreas Mock
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andreas Mock [mailto:andreas.m...@web.de]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. September 2013 13:38
An: 'The Pacemaker cluster resource
On 2013-09-18T17:53:16, "Gao,Yan" wrote:
> > "actions-limit" is a good name. (One of the three hard problems in
> > computer science! ;-)
> >
> > (If we need it more fine grained at any point in the future, we can
> > always add class/provider/type/op elements to it.)
> Been thinking how to expr
On 09/17/13 15:53, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-09-16T18:19:55, "Gao,Yan" wrote:
>
>>> 1. Global property: operations-limit, operations-limit-migrate (alias
>>> for migration-threshold)
>> How about to keep it "migration-limit", and name the new property
>
On 2013-09-17 16:25, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank for your reply Andreas, I set the multiplier to 1000, cut the
> netword nothing append.
Well, the ping resource-agent updates the value on every monitor event
looking again on your configuration, guess what operation is
missing? ;
32 matches
Mail list logo
