Hi, Jay
Yep. Here is the link to mail archive (I hoped that they would hit "Reply
All" button):
https://www.mail-archive.com/pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org/msg19896.html
Actually, this is what Mirantis Linux Hardening team could do, I hope, in
this release cycle and push it to upstream.
On Thu,
On 12/06/14 00:51, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Chrissy? Can you shed some light here?
On 11 Jun 2014, at 11:26 pm, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko
wrote:
Hi guys,
I am trying to deal somehow with split brain situation in 2 node cluster using
votequorum.
Here is a quorum section in my corosync.conf:
pro
Hi All,
This might be a basic question but I'm not sure whats taking time for
failover switching.
Hope anyone can figure it out.
Scenario -
Pacemaker running DRBD(Dual primary mode)+OCFS2+XEN for Virtual windows
machine
Pacemaker startup starts -
DRBD -> OCFS2 -> XEN
Lets consider under Server1
Hi Kamal,
I will not answer to your question, but actually I am working on a
similar configuration, and I have an issue as described on the following
thread [1].
Long story short, when I standby a node (crm node standby) then put it
online again my drbd device goes into a split-brain state.
Have
Hi all,
I'm trying to configure my PSQL primitive. I have a 2 node cluster running
with pacemaker 1.1.10, corosync 1.3.3 on Ubuntu Server 14.04 LTS. It is an
active/passive cluster, so PostgreSQL (and all other resources) just have
to run on the left or the right node.
It's strange...PSQL is run
Hi All,
I deployed Pacemaker 1.1.12-rc2 on our platform to test the cib changes.
This was needed on our setup as it contains 6 nodes, 150 resources and
the cib process was using lots of cpu.
With a limited set of resources (6 nodes, 30 resources) everything
worked as expected, including crm_m
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:10:55AM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Referring to the king of drbd...
> Lars, question for you inline.
> > ===
> > primitive DRBD-ffm ocf:linbit:drbd params drbd_resource=ffm \
> > op start interval=0
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:07:51PM +0200, Alexis de BRUYN wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I have an issue with a 2-node Debian Wheezy primary/primary DRBD
> Pacemaker/Corosync configuration.
>
> After a 'crm node standby' then a 'crm node online', the DRBD volume
> stays in a 'split brain state' (cs:S
On 12 Jun 2014, at 10:53 pm, Johan Huysmans wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I deployed Pacemaker 1.1.12-rc2 on our platform to test the cib changes.
> This was needed on our setup as it contains 6 nodes, 150 resources and the
> cib process was using lots of cpu.
>
> With a limited set of resources (6 no
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 03:57:28PM -0400, David Vossel wrote:
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Infoomatic"
> > To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 2:26:00 PM
> > Subject: [Pacemaker] drbd + lvm
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I am having troubles wi
On 12 Jun 2014, at 9:15 pm, kamal kishi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This might be a basic question but I'm not sure whats taking time for
> failover switching.
> Hope anyone can figure it out.
How about looking in the logs and seeing when the various stop/start actions
occur and which ones take the
On 12 Jun 2014, at 9:51 pm, Christian Gebler
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to configure my PSQL primitive. I have a 2 node cluster running
> with pacemaker 1.1.10, corosync 1.3.3 on Ubuntu Server 14.04 LTS. It is an
> active/passive cluster, so PostgreSQL (and all other resources) just ha
Fine Andrew, will check it out but does the timeouts provided for pacemaker
affect this??
Which part of the time configuration will be considered by pacemaker to
decide if the other node is actually down and the resources should be taken
over by it.
And Alexis, I'm not facing any issue while putti
software versions?
On 10 Jun 2014, at 9:28 pm, ESWAR RAO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a 3 node cluster [node1 ,node2, node3] HB+pacemaker setup.
> All config files and auth files are same on all the 3 nodes.
>
> But strangely always node3 is unable to join cluster group.
> In the ha logs of DC node
14 matches
Mail list logo
