On 18 Feb 2014, at 9:12 pm, Asgaroth wrote:
>>
>> The 3rd node should (and needs to be) fenced at this point to allow the
>> cluster to continue.
>> Is this not happening?
>
> The fencing operation appears to complete successfully, here is the
> sequence:
>
> [1] All 3 nodes running properly
On 19 Feb 2014, at 7:16 am, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 18.02.2014 23:01, David Vossel wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Vladislav Bogdanov" To:
>>> pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014
>>> 1:02:09 PM Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] node1 fenci
I'll follow up on the bug.
On 19 Feb 2014, at 10:55 am, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thank you for comments.
>
>> You have resource-stickiness=INFINITY, this is what is preventing the
>> failover from occurring. Set resource-stickiness=1 or 0 and the failover
>> should oc
On 18 Feb 2014, at 11:05 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
> Hi, ALL and Andrew!
>
> Today is a good day - I killed a lot, and a lot of shooting at me.
> In general - I am happy (almost like an elephant) :)
> Except resources on the node are important to me eight processes:
> corosync,pacemakerd,cib
hat will fail causing the crmd
to fail and the node to be fenced.
> Generaly don't touch corosync,cib and maybe lrmd,crmd.
>
> What do you think about this?
> The main question of this topic - we decided.
> But this varied behavior - another big problem.
>
>
>
>
On 19 Feb 2014, at 10:48 am, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:54:29 +0900 (JST)
> renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> I found your correction.
>>
>> https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/37ff51a0edba208e6240e812936717fffc941a41
>>
On 18 Feb 2014, at 8:18 pm, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 18 Feb 2014, at 7:40 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 18.02.2014 03:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 31 Jan 2014, at 6:20 pm, yusuke iida wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, all
&g
On 18 Feb 2014, at 7:40 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 18.02.2014 03:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 31 Jan 2014, at 6:20 pm, yusuke iida wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, all
>>>
>>> I measure the performance of Pacemaker in the following combina
On 18 Feb 2014, at 7:25 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 29.01.2014 08:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> ...
>>
>> Thats a known deficiency in the v1 diff format (and why we need costly
>> digests to detect ordering changes).
>> Happily .12 will have a new and improv
srv01:
>
> -
>
> I uploaded log in the next place.(trac2781.zip)
>
> * https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=3A14D57622C66876&id=3A14D57622C66876%21117
>
> Best Regards,
> Hideo Yamauchi.
>
>
> --- On Tue, 2014/2/18, Andrew Beekhof wrote
On 6 Feb 2014, at 7:45 pm, Keisuke MORI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I observed that pre_notify_demote is issued twice when a master
> resource is migrating.
> I'm wondering if this is the correct behavior.
>
> Steps to reproduce:
>
> - Start up 2 nodes cluster configured for the PostgreSQL streaming
> r
On 10 Feb 2014, at 5:28 pm, Kazunori INOUE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Pacemaker stopped, but it was judged that a resource was active.
> I put crm_report here.
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9eNn1AWfKD4S29JWk1ldUJJNGs/edit?usp=sharing
>
> [Steps to reproduce]
> 1) start up the cluster
>
> Stack: c
iscuss the correction to put meta data in
> rsc-parameters with Mr. Lars? Or Mr. David?
>
> Best Regards,
> Hideo Yamauchi.
>
> --- On Tue, 2014/2/18, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>
>> On 17 Feb 2014, at 5:43 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>>
>>
On 17 Feb 2014, at 5:43 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The next change was accomplished by Mr. Lars.
>
> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/6a17c003b0167de9fe51d5330fb6e4f1b4ffe64c
I'm confused... that patch seems to be the reverse of yours.
Are you saying tha
On 22 Jan 2014, at 10:54 am, Brian J. Murrell (brian)
wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:49 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> What crm_mon are you looking at?
>> I see stuff like:
>>
>> virt-fencing (stonith:fence_xvm):Started rhos4-node3
>> Resou
On 31 Jan 2014, at 6:20 pm, yusuke iida wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I measure the performance of Pacemaker in the following combinations.
> Pacemaker-1.1.11.rc1
> libqb-0.16.0
> corosync-2.3.2
>
> All nodes are KVM virtual machines.
>
> stopped the node of vm01 compulsorily from the inside, after s
On 17 Feb 2014, at 5:38 pm, emmanuel segura wrote:
> example: colocation ipwithpgsql inf: virtualip psql:Master
Ah, so colocating with the host running the vm with the master inside it.
Thats not something we can do yet, sorry.
>
>
> 2014-02-17 6:25 GMT+01:00 Tomasz Kontusz :
&g
On 12 Feb 2014, at 9:53 pm, Marko Potocnik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've upgraded from pacemaker-1.1.7-6.el6.x86_64 to
> pacemaker-1.1.10-14.el6_5.2.x86_64.
> I use crm_mon with --as-html option to get the cluster status in html file.
> I've noticed that the permissions for file have changed from 644
On 18 Feb 2014, at 5:52 am, Asgaroth wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
>> Sent: 17 February 2014 00:55
>> To: li...@blueface.com; The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
>> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] node1 fe
On 17 Feb 2014, at 10:34 pm, Néstor C. wrote:
>
>
>
> 2014-02-17 1:22 GMT+01:00 Andrew Beekhof :
>
> On 21 Jan 2014, at 10:50 pm, Néstor C. wrote:
>
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> When you need that some primitives switch in block you can use a group
Could this
> error be a result of these un-implemented actions?
Unlikely. More likely the monitor action is not correctly returning
OCF_NOT_RUNNING if run before the resource is running.
> On 02/16/2014 09:15 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On 12 Feb 2014, at 1:39 am, Ajay Aggarwal
On 16 Feb 2014, at 6:53 am, emmanuel segura wrote:
> i think, if you use pacemaker_remote inside the container, the container will
> be a normal node of you cluster, so you can run pgsql + vip in it
>
>
> 2014-02-15 19:40 GMT+01:00 Tomasz Kontusz :
> Hi
> I'm setting up a cluster which will u
On 12 Feb 2014, at 1:39 am, Ajay Aggarwal wrote:
> Yes, we have cman (version: cman-3.0.12.1-49). We use manual fencing ( I know
> it is not recommended). There is an external monitoring and fencing service
> that we use (our own).
>
> Perhaps subject line "resource is too active problem in
On 17 Feb 2014, at 12:47 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for comments.
>
>> Is this related to your email about symmetrical not being defaulted
>> consistently between colocate_rsc_sets() and unpack_colocation_set()?
>
> Yes.
> I think that a default is not ha
Attachments beat pastebin as they don't expire :)
What does your config look like after you run:
crm resource migrate nfs_services nfs01
?
On 7 Feb 2014, at 5:00 am, Andrew J. Caines wrote:
> I'm new to Pacemaker and am working on my RTFM+STFW efforts, but have an
> urgent need to find the cau
On 31 Jan 2014, at 3:18 am, Pascal BERTON wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I recently changed hosting platform versions for my PCMK clusters, from
> RHEL6.0 equivalent towards SL6.4. Also changed from pcmk 1.1.2+corosync 1.3.3
> to pcmk 1.1.10+corosync 1.4.1 that come with SL6.
> Until now, I used to mana
On 7 Feb 2014, at 8:54 pm, Frank Brendel wrote:
>
>> Its somewhat inferred in the description of cluster-recheck-interval
>>
>>cluster-recheck-interval = time [15min]
>>Polling interval for time based changes to options, resource
>> parameters and constraints.
>>
>>
Is this related to your email about symmetrical not being defaulted
consistently between colocate_rsc_sets() and unpack_colocation_set()?
On 22 Jan 2014, at 3:05 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> My test seemed to include a mistake.
> It seems to be replaced by two limitation.
On 11 Feb 2014, at 8:23 pm, Bauer, Stefan (IZLBW Extern)
wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> we’ve recovered a cluster after a failure and used a previously exported
> cib.xml. Everything is back to normal state.
> The strange thing is, that the order in the output of crm_mon is not like
> before.
>
>
On 11 Feb 2014, at 2:49 am, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> cannot find anywhere (am I blind?), is it possible to manually inject
> 'reload' op for a given resource?
>
> Background for this is if some configuration files are edited, and
> resource-agent (or LSB script) supports 'reload' op
On 7 Feb 2014, at 10:22 pm, Asgaroth wrote:
> On 06/02/2014 05:52, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I bet your problem comes from the LSB clvmd init script.
>> Here is what it does do:
>>
>> ===
>> ...
>> clustered_vgs() {
>> ${lvm_vgdisplay} 2>/dev/null | \
>> awk 'B
On 25 Jan 2014, at 12:55 am, Parveen Jain wrote:
> Hi All,
> Can there be any problem if we install pacemaker/corosync on different
> subnets(for a simple two machine setup cluster) ?
Corosync uses multicast by default which I could easily imagine would not like
this kind of setup.
Perhaps
On 22 Jan 2014, at 12:18 am, Robert Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get rid of some stonith info logging but I fail :(
Turn off debug and, for everything else, edit the C source code
>
> The log-lines are like this in syslog:
> Jan 21 13:24:15 wolf1 stonith-ng: [6349]: info: stonith_
On 21 Jan 2014, at 10:50 pm, Néstor C. wrote:
> Hello.
>
> When you need that some primitives switch in block you can use a group.
Groups are just a syntactic shortcut for ordering and colocation constraints.
>
> There is a manner to get this when you have a clone or a master/slave
> involv
Was there a question here somewhere?
On 20 Jan 2014, at 9:59 pm, Praveen wrote:
> [root@pcmk-2 ~]# pcs status
> Cluster name: mycluster
> Last updated: Mon Jan 20 15:56:13 2014
> Last change: Mon Jan 20 15:47:11 2014 via crm_attribute on pcmk-1
> Stack: corosync
> Current DC: pcmk-2 (2) - partit
On 20 Jan 2014, at 8:05 pm, Axel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is my first post, i hope i meet all required informations and netiquette
> on this list.
>
> I need help to backup and restore resource configuration i made with corosync
> / pacemaker an an ubuntu server (precise)
>
> I configured
On 17 Jan 2014, at 4:33 pm, Michael Monette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 servers setup with Postgres and /dev/drbd1 is mounted at
> /var/lib/pgsql. I also have pacemaker setup and it's setup to fail back and
> forth between the 2 nodes. It works really well for the most part.
>
> I am having th
On 13 Feb 2014, at 9:56 am, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> I noticed in recent discussions on this list that this RA is apparently a
> SUSE thing and not upstreamed into resource-agents. This was news to me, but
> apparently is indeed the case.
>
> I guess it's SUSE's decision whether to push it
With no quick follow-up, dare one hope that means the patch worked? :-)
On 14 Feb 2014, at 3:37 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
> Yes, of course. Now beginning build world and test )
>
> 14.02.2014, 04:41, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>> The previous patch wasn't quite right.
Not without seeing your configuration.
At a guess you've not defined a fencing agent in pacemaker.
On 15 Feb 2014, at 5:02 am, Remo Mattei wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
> could you suggest a fix for this. i am using Red Hat 6.5.
>
> Thanks I got the same error on bot servers.
>
> Feb 13 19:01:10 c
N__, peer, CRM_NODE_LOST, 0);
+crm_update_peer_proc(__FUNCTION__, peer, crm_proc_none, NULL);
+}
+crm_update_peer_join(__FUNCTION__, peer, crm_join_none);
+crm_update_peer_expected(__FUNCTION__, peer, CRMD_JOINSTATE_DOWN);
+}
On 16 Jan 2014, at 7:24 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
Great job David, thanks for taking the lead on this role while I was on baby
duty :)
On 14 Feb 2014, at 4:26 am, David Vossel wrote:
>
> I am excited to announce the release of Pacemaker v1.1.11
>
> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/releases/tag/Pacemaker-1.1.11
>
> There were no cha
nual server" to successfully provided the needed ack
> that stonith has been successful.
>
> Bob Haxo
>
>
> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 14:58 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On 10 Jan 2014, at 3:54 pm, Nikita Staroverov wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >
On 7 Feb 2014, at 6:30 pm, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
> Am Freitag, 7. Februar 2014, 17:09:39 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
>> On 23 Jan 2014, at 12:30 am, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>>> On 2014-01-22T09:37:33, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>&
On 23 Jan 2014, at 12:30 am, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2014-01-22T09:37:33, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am working on a SNMP agent for pacemaker. it is written in perl. At the
>> moment it is in an alpha stadium.
>>
>> Any volunteers for testing?
>
> I'd be quite cur
On 7 Feb 2014, at 3:55 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
> Hi, Andrew and ALL!
>
> Andrew, We did not bury this topic?
No, I've just not had a chance to return to it.
I've spent the last week in dbus hell for the .11 release and had vaction
before that
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with
On 31 Jan 2014, at 2:15 am, Michael Monette wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am coming up short in my searches, but I don't know exactly what I am
> searching for, hoping someone could point me in the right direction.
>
> I have Pacemaker setup in active/passive on my Email server. The systems are
> in
On 31 Jan 2014, at 9:36 pm, Parveen Jain wrote:
> Hi,
> Even I had seen that bug. But that bug was force closed because they found
> it to some switch error.
> For me, it appears on a consistent basis. Sometimes automatically it goes
> away and then reappears when I recreate the cluster using
On 3 Feb 2014, at 9:40 pm, Frank Brendel wrote:
> I've solved the problem.
>
> When I set cluster-recheck-interval to a value less than failure-timeout
> it works.
>
> Is this an expected behavior?
Yes.
>
> This is not documented anywhere.
Its somewhat inferred in the description of clust
On 6 Feb 2014, at 3:33 pm, Digimer wrote:
> On 05/02/14 11:30 PM, Nikita Staroverov wrote:
>>
>>> Some archive messages seem to suggest that clvmd should be started
>>> outside of the cluster at system boot (cman -> clvmd -> pacemaker),
>>> however, my personal preference would be to have these
http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Explained/_resource_operations.html
On 4 Feb 2014, at 2:05 am, elo wrote:
>
>
>
> please, how do i add the stop timeout??
>
> Thanks. will be really grateful to get a REPLY
>
>
> ___
>
On 5 Feb 2014, at 2:57 pm, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 05.02.2014 04:06, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 3 Feb 2014, at 11:34 pm, Frank Brendel wrote:
>>
>>> As far as I know, Pacemaker does not parse STDOUT but it keeps STDERR
>>> for loggin
On 3 Feb 2014, at 11:34 pm, Frank Brendel wrote:
> As far as I know, Pacemaker does not parse STDOUT but it keeps STDERR
> for logging.
> Experts correct me if I am wrong.
You are correct
[snip]
>> Does nobody have an idea? I checked this link:
>>
>> http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemak
On 28 Jan 2014, at 10:11 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just discovered, that when I add resource to a middle of
> (running) group, it is added to the end.
>
> I mean, if I update following (crmsh syntax)
>
> group dhcp-server vip-10-5-200-244 dhcpd
>
> with
>
> group dhcp-serv
On 24 Jan 2014, at 3:25 pm, Digimer wrote:
> On 23/01/14 11:08 PM, David Vossel wrote:
>> You may have noticed the release did not happen. I'm investigating a bug in
>> the service api involving systemd scripts. I'm postponing the release until
>> I understand what is going on.
>>
>> -- Voss
On 17 Jan 2014, at 9:05 am, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2014-01-17T07:40:34, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> Well, unless RHT states that installing crmsh on top of their
>>> distribution invalidates support for the pacemaker back-end, you could
>>> just ship
On 16 Jan 2014, at 10:59 pm, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2014-01-15T20:25:30, Bob Haxo wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, it configuration has taken me weeks to develop (what now
>> seems to be) a working configuration (including mods to the
>> VirtualDomain agent to avoid spurious restarts of the
id Vossel"
>>> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2014 4:50:11 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>> From: "Andrew B
On 16 Jan 2014, at 3:25 pm, Bob Haxo wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 12:32 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On 16 Jan 2014, at 11:49 am, Bob Haxo wrote:
>>
>>>> On 01/15/2014 05:02 PM, Bob Haxo wrote:
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>
On 16 Jan 2014, at 1:13 pm, Brian J. Murrell (brian)
wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 08:35 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> I know, I was giving you another example of when the cib is not completely
>> up-to-date with reality.
>
> Yeah, I understood that. I w
On 16 Jan 2014, at 11:49 am, Bob Haxo wrote:
>> On 01/15/2014 05:02 PM, Bob Haxo wrote:
>> > Greetings,
>> >
>> > The command "crm configure show" dumps the cluster configuration in a
>> > format
>> > that is suitable for use in configuring a cluster.
>> >
>> > The command "pcs config" generat
On 16 Jan 2014, at 6:53 am, Brian J. Murrell (brian)
wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 17:11 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> Consider any long running action, such as starting a database.
>> We do not update the CIB until after actions have completed, so there can
>
On 16 Jan 2014, at 12:41 am, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 15.01.2014, 02:53, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>> On 15 Jan 2014, at 12:15 am, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>>
>>> 14.01.2014, 10:00, "Andrey Groshev" :
>>>> 14.01.2014, 07:47, "
On 15 Jan 2014, at 7:12 pm, Kazunori INOUE wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> With new migration logic, when VM was migrated by 'node standby',
> start was performed in migrate_target. (migrate_from was not performed.)
>
> Is this the designed behavior?
>
>
> # crm_mon -rf1
> Stack: corosync
> Current D
On 14 Jan 2014, at 11:50 pm, Brian J. Murrell (brian)
wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 16:01 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 08:09 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The local cib hasn't caught up yet by the looks
On 14 Jan 2014, at 11:25 pm, Juraj Fabo wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have master-slave cluster with configuration attached below.
> It is based on documented postgresql master-slave cluster configuration.
> Colocation constraints should work that way that if some of "master-group"
> resources fails,
> f
x27;d have expected the stop action to be performed with the old attributes.
>>> crm_report tarball?
>>
>> Okay.
>>
>> I register this topic with Bugzilla.
>> I attach the log to Bugzilla.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Hideo Yamauchi.
>> ---
On 14 Jan 2014, at 7:26 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> When a user changes the "globally-unique" attribute of the resource, a
> problem occurs.
>
> When it manages the resource with PID file, this occurs, but this is because
> PID file name changes by "globally-unique" at
On 15 Jan 2014, at 12:15 am, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 14.01.2014, 10:00, "Andrey Groshev" :
>> 14.01.2014, 07:47, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>>
>>> Ok, here's what happens:
>>>
>>> 1. node2 is lost
>>> 2. fencin
recognized option '--ban'
>>
>>
>> No other way to move master?
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014/1/13 Andrew Beekhof
>>
>> On 13 Jan 2014, at 8:32 pm, Andrey Rogovsky wrote:
>>
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I have 3 nod
;> Only the new code makes (or at least should do) crmd-transition-delay
>>>> redundant.
>>>
>>> It did not seem to work so that new attrd dispensed with
>>> crmd-transition-delay to me.
>>> I report the details again.
>>> # Probably it will be B
e new code makes (or at least should do) crmd-transition-delay
>> redundant.
>
> It did not seem to work so that new attrd dispensed with
> crmd-transition-delay to me.
> I report the details again.
> # Probably it will be Bugzilla. . .
Sounds good
>
> Best R
On 14 Jan 2014, at 3:52 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I contributed next bugzilla by a problem to occur for the difference of the
> timing of the attribute update by attrd before.
> * https://developerbugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2528
>
> We can evade this pro
On 14 Jan 2014, at 3:41 pm, Brian J. Murrell (brian)
wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 08:09 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> The local cib hasn't caught up yet by the looks of it.
>
> Should crm_resource actually be [mis-]reporting as if it were
> knowledgeable
On 14 Jan 2014, at 3:34 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 14.01.2014, 06:25, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>> Apart from anything else, your timeout needs to be bigger:
>>
>> Jan 13 12:21:36 [17223] dev-cluster2-node1.unix.tensor.ru stonith-ng: (
>> commands.
nce the script makes sure that the victim will rebooted and again
available via ssh - it exit with 0." does not seem true.
On 14 Jan 2014, at 1:19 pm, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Apart from anything else, your timeout needs to be bigger:
>
> Jan 13 12:21:36 [17223] dev-cluste
On 14 Jan 2014, at 1:19 pm, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Apart from anything else, your timeout needs to be bigger:
>
> Jan 13 12:21:36 [17223] dev-cluster2-node1.unix.tensor.ru stonith-ng: (
> commands.c:1321 ) error: log_operation: Operation 'reboot' [11331] (call
&g
7; with device
'st1' returned: -62 (Timer expired)
On 14 Jan 2014, at 7:18 am, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 13 Jan 2014, at 8:31 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 13.01.2014, 02:51, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>>> On 10 Jan 2014, at
On 19 Dec 2013, at 1:08 am, Gaëtan Slongo wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I'm currently building a 2 node cluster for firewalling.
> I would like to run a shorewall on both on the master and the "Slave"
> node. I tried many things but nothing works as expected. Shorewall
> configurations are good.
> What I w
On 13 Jan 2014, at 8:32 pm, Andrey Rogovsky wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have 3 node postgresql cluster.
> It work well. But I have some trobule with change master.
>
> For now, if I need change master, I must:
> 1) Stop PGSQL on each node and cluster service
> 2) Start Setup new manual PGSQL replication
On 14 Jan 2014, at 5:13 am, Brian J. Murrell (brian)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found a situation using pacemaker 1.1.10 on RHEL6.5 where the output
> of "crm_resource -L" is not trust-able, shortly after a node is booted.
>
> Here is the output from crm_resource -L on one of the nodes in a two
> nod
On 13 Jan 2014, at 8:31 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 13.01.2014, 02:51, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>> On 10 Jan 2014, at 9:55 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>>
>>> 10.01.2014, 14:31, "Andrey Groshev" :
>>>> 10.01.2014, 14:01, "A
On 10 Jan 2014, at 3:54 pm, Nikita Staroverov wrote:
>
There is no-one to tell yet.
We have to wait for cman to decide something needs fencing before
pacemaker can perform the notification.
>>> if I get you right i need own fencing agent that doing manual confirmed
>>> fe
On 10 Jan 2014, at 9:55 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 10.01.2014, 14:31, "Andrey Groshev" :
>> 10.01.2014, 14:01, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>>
>>> On 10 Jan 2014, at 5:03 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>>>> 10.01.2014, 05:29, "An
On 10 Jan 2014, at 6:18 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 10.01.2014, 10:15, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>> On 10 Jan 2014, at 4:38 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>>
>>> 10.01.2014, 09:06, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>>>> On 10 Jan 2014, at 3:51
Fair enough. Pull request?
On 12 Jan 2014, at 8:29 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the only one message I see in logs in otherwise static cluster
> (with rechecks enabled), probably it is good idea to downgrade it to info.
>
> diff --git a/lib/pengine/unpack.c b/lib/pengine/un
On 10 Jan 2014, at 5:03 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
> 10.01.2014, 05:29, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>
>> On 9 Jan 2014, at 11:11 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>>> 08.01.2014, 06:22, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>>>> On 29 Nov 2013, at 7:17 pm, Andrey Groshe
On 10 Jan 2014, at 4:38 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 10.01.2014, 09:06, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>> On 10 Jan 2014, at 3:51 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>>
>>> 10.01.2014, 03:28, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>>>> On 9 Jan 2014, at 4:44 pm, And
On 10 Jan 2014, at 3:51 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 10.01.2014, 03:28, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>> On 9 Jan 2014, at 4:44 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>>
>>> 09.01.2014, 02:39, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>>>> On 18 Dec 2013, a
On 9 Jan 2014, at 11:11 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 08.01.2014, 06:22, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>> On 29 Nov 2013, at 7:17 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, ALL.
>>>
>>> I'm still trying to cope with the fact that after
On 9 Jan 2014, at 4:44 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
> 09.01.2014, 02:39, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>
>> On 18 Dec 2013, at 11:55 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>>> Hi, Andrew and ALL.
>>>
>>> I'm sorry, but I again found an error. :)
>&g
On 9 Jan 2014, at 5:05 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 08.01.2014, 06:15, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>> On 27 Nov 2013, at 12:26 am, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, ALL.
>>>
>>> I want to clarify two more questions.
>>> Aft
On 9 Jan 2014, at 8:29 pm, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> 2014/1/8 Andrew Beekhof :
>>> I don't understand it: if this means that the stonith devices have
>>> failed a million times,
>>
>> We also set it to 100 when the start action fails.
>>
>
On 18 Dec 2013, at 11:55 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
> Hi, Andrew and ALL.
>
> I'm sorry, but I again found an error. :)
> Crux of the problem:
>
> # crm_attribute --type crm_config --attr-name stonith-enabled --query; echo $?
> scope=crm_config name=stonith-enabled value=true
> 0
>
> # crm_at
On 7 Dec 2013, at 8:19 pm, Andrey Rogovsky wrote:
> I renamed several nodes and restart the cluster
> Now I show a old nodes in status offline
> I tried to delete them, but every time you change the cluster configuration
> they show in offline again
It depends a bit on the version of pacemaker
On 5 Dec 2013, at 8:51 pm, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> Hello Digimer,
>
> and thanks for Your reply. I understand your points, but my question
> is about something a bit different..
>
> example: I have two nodes, node1 (lan address resolves to 192.168.1.1)
> and node2 (lan address resolves to 192
On 4 Dec 2013, at 11:47 am, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 18:26 -0500, David Vossel wrote:
>>
>> We did away with all of the policy engine logic involved with trying to move
>> fencing devices off of the target node before executing the fencing action.
>> Behind the scen
On 13 Dec 2013, at 11:06 pm, ESWAR RAO wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have a 3 node setup with HB+pacemaker. I wanted to run redis in
> master-slave mode using an ocf script.
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/redis-db/eY3zCKnl0G0/lW5fObHrjwQJ
>
> But with the below configuration , I am able
On 6 Jan 2014, at 8:09 pm, Jerald B. Darow wrote:
> Where am I going wrong here?
Good question... Chris?
>
> [root@zero mysql]# pcs cluster standby zero.acenet.us
> Error: node 'zero.acenet.us' does not appear to exist in configuration
> [root@zero mysql]# pcs cluster cib | grep "node id"
>
On 8 Jan 2014, at 2:41 am, Frank Van Damme wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I recently had some trouble with a dual-node mysql cluster, which runs
> in master-slave mode with Percona resource manager. While analyzing
> what happened to the cluster, I found this in syslog (network trouble,
> the cluster lo
601 - 700 of 4430 matches
Mail list logo
