ch details here ?
TIA,
-Carlos
--
Carlos G MendiorozLW7 EQI Argentina
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting sta
Thank you for all your comments.
Andrew Beekhof @ 14/02/2011 05:44 -0300 dixit:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to understand how to best implement a HA EE service.
Searching for linux + HA induced me to go linux-HA way (heartbeat?)
and that s
doc. Would you accept errata items ?
May be I should PM you, but page 10, pcmk-2 is supposed to be
19.168.9.42 . Typo^2 ? 192.168.122.102 ?
Also, ..."add additional entries for the three machines". Three ?
--
Carlos G MendiorozLW7 EQI
rements lately.
Mostly its dependent on how long the RA takes.
Ok, now I'm getting into RA arena I guess.
For speedy failover, I would need a hot standby approach. Is that a
pacemaker known state ?
--
Carlos G MendiorozLW7 EQI Argentina
__
failure case I would appreciate it.
-Carlos
--
Carlos G MendiorozLW7 EQI Argentina
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Gettin
Brett Delle Grazie @ 17/02/2011 10:24 -0300 dixit:
Hi,
On 17 February 2011 12:58, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
Hi,
I've found that ipaddr2 can use clusterip when running as clone.
(please correct me if I use some word in a not correct way,
denoting I fail to get some concept)
B
ourse.
--
Carlos G MendiorozLW7 EQI Argentina
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.or
of
resources that can stay up in this node, a number that can be
statically configured per node. As long as the number of connected
resources is above half of the defined, quorum is mantained.
Forgive me is this has already been discussed and discarded by some
reason.
Regards,
--
Carlos G Mendioroz
Andrew Beekhof @ 21/02/2011 11:01 -0300 dixit:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
Hi,
As I understand it, pacemaker decides on having quorum
Let me stop you there... pacemaker doesn't normally decide this at all.
It doesn't for heartbeat based clusters an
nter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
--
Carlos G MendiorozLW7 EQI Argentina
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www
a resource configuration option too.
--
Carlos G MendiorozLW7 EQI Argentina
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting sta
Andrew Beekhof @ 17/3/2011 5:05 -0300 dixit:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
Andrew Beekhof @ 16/3/2011 16:19 -0300 dixit:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Pavel Levshin
wrote:
16.03.2011 10:29, Andrew Beekhof:
I still don't understand why it monitors ser
d work
around a deficiency in the cluster stack's quorum handling.
Why is that it is a broken idea ?
In the case of partition, reason might be a network failure.
A quorum node could behave as a reference point to determine which part
of the cluster is still connected to the rest of the wo
being used dynamically ? If not, that could be used
as a marker for "this (resource) can not possibly run in this node"
so monitoring is not necesary ?
--
Carlos G MendiorozLW7 EQI Argentina
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.
Serge Dubrouski @ 21/03/2011 13:49 -0300 dixit:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
Serge Dubrouski @ 21/03/2011 13:10 -0300 dixit:
What I am talking about is monitoring (probing) of a resource on a node
where this resource cannot be exist.
As far as I understand that
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-
Is there a way to let pacemaker get info on the performance of
a resource from another node point of view ?
--
Carlos G MendiorozLW7 EQI Argentina
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman
source) is indeed working
fine. The idea works well in a number of network protocols.
-Carlos
Michael Schwartzkopff @ 06/04/2011 03:57 -0300 dixit:
Not really, unless you have the monitor op ssh to the other machine to
run the command
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
Is t
//www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
--
Carlos G MendiorozLW7 EQI Argentina
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/li
P address
being attached to the host for the configuration to be accepted.
Has anybody thought about having a local (i.e. loppback) address
and then switching ARP responsibility over the LAN as an alternative ?
Has this been implemented already and I'm rediscovering a wheel ? :)
--
Carlos G
e best way to pass the traffic to the second node, should
the first one fail, then notify us that node 1 has failed...
-Original Message-----
From: Carlos G Mendioroz [mailto:t...@huapi.ba.ar]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 12:27 PM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re:
Andrew Beekhof @ 15/04/2011 03:31 -0300 dixit:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
Hi,
I've a doubt on the best way (tm) to deal with HA in the case of services
that are somehow proxies to some other resource (i.e.
stateless in some sense).
The problem seems to be
22 matches
Mail list logo
