17.07.2015 10:46, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
[...]
The attribute is not listed in the PE meta-data and therefore
considered an error. You can make crmsh less strict like this:
# crm option set core.check_mode relaxed
It'll still print the error, but your changes are going to be
committed.
Given
19.05.2015 11:44, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 05:14:14PM +0200, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hi Dejan,
The list below seems too extensive. Which version of
resource-agents do you run?
$ grep 'Build version:' /usr/lib/ocf/lib/heartbeat/ocf-shellfuncs
yes, it's definitely wron
19.05.2015 11:46, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 07:34:38PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
18.05.2015 18:57, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hi Vladislav,
Isn't that a bind-mount?
nope, but your question lead me to possible culprit..
it's cephfs mount, when I try to
18.05.2015 18:57, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hi Vladislav,
Isn't that a bind-mount?
nope, but your question lead me to possible culprit..
it's cephfs mount, when I try to some local filesystem, I don't
see this weird fuser behaviour..
so maybe fuser does not work correctly on cephfs?
yep, for b
18.05.2015 13:20, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hi,
I noticed very annoying bug (or so I think), that resource-agents-3.9.5
in RHEL / centos 6 Filesystem OCF resource seems to be killing completely
unrelated processes on shutdown although they're not using anything on mounted
filesystem...
Isn't that
17.04.2015 00:48, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:04 am, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
20.01.2015 02:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 16 Jan 2015, at 3:59 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
16.01.2015 07:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 15 Jan 2015, at 3:11 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote
23.02.2015 21:50, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
On 14 Feb 2015, at 1:10 am, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
Hi,
I believe that is a bug that 'stop' operation uses set of instance
attributes from the original 'start' op, not what successful 'relo
24.02.2015 01:58, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 21 Jan 2015, at 5:08 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
21.01.2015 03:51, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 20 Jan 2015, at 4:13 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
20.01.2015 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 17 Jan 2015, at 1:25 am, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote
Hi,
I believe that is a bug that 'stop' operation uses set of instance
attributes from the original 'start' op, not what successful 'reload' had.
Corresponding pe-input has correct set of attributes, and pre-stop
'notify' op uses updated set of attributes too.
This is easily reproducible with
Hi,
is there a way for resource agent to tell pacemaker that in some cases
reload operation is insufficient to apply new resource definition and
restart is required?
I tried to return OCF_ERR_GENERIC, but that prevents resource from being
started until failure-timeout lapses and cluster is r
Hi,
Playing with two-week old git master on a two-node cluster I discovered
that only limited set of "notify" operations is performed for clone and
master-slave instances when all of them are being started/stopped.
Clones (anonymous):
* post-start
* pre-stop
M/S:
* post-start
* post-promote
Hi Dejan,
if it is not too late, would it be possible to add output of environment
into resource trace file when tracing is enabled?
--- ocf-shellfuncs.orig 2015-01-26 15:50:34.435001364 +
+++ ocf-shellfuncs 2015-01-26 15:49:19.707001542 +
@@ -822,6 +822,7 @@
fi
PS
Hi,
21.01.2015 12:50, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
Hello,
renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp writes:
Hi All,
We confirmed a function of crmsh by the next combination.
* corosync-2.3.4
* pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.12
* crmsh-2.1.0
By new crmsh, does "options sort-elements no" not work?
Is there th
20.01.2015 02:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> On 16 Jan 2015, at 3:59 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>> 16.01.2015 07:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 15 Jan 2015, at 3:11 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>&g
21.01.2015 03:51, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 20 Jan 2015, at 4:13 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
20.01.2015 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 17 Jan 2015, at 1:25 am, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
Hi all,
Trying to reproduce problem with early stop of globally-unique
clone instances during move
20.01.2015 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 17 Jan 2015, at 1:25 am, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
Hi all,
Trying to reproduce problem with early stop of globally-unique
clone instances during move to another node I found one more
"interesting" problem.
Due to the different order of
Hi all,
Trying to reproduce problem with early stop of globally-unique clone
instances during move to another node I found one more "interesting"
problem.
Due to the different order of resources in the CIB and extensive use of
constraints between other resources (odd number of resources
clu
16.01.2015 07:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 15 Jan 2015, at 3:11 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
13.01.2015 11:32, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
Hi Andrew, David, all.
I found a little bit strange operation ordering during transition
t_full = TRUE;
+
} else if (child_rsc->fns->active(child_rsc, TRUE)) {
/* Fully active anonymous clone */
node_t *location = child_rsc->fns->location(child_rsc, NULL,
TRUE);
On 10 Jan 2015, at 12:16 am, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi all,
It seems
13.01.2015 11:32, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
Hi Andrew, David, all.
I found a little bit strange operation ordering during transition execution.
Could you please look at the following partial configuration (crmsh syntax
Hi Andrew, David, all.
I found a little bit strange operation ordering during transition execution.
Could you please look at the following partial configuration (crmsh syntax)?
===
...
clone cl-broker broker \
meta interleave=true target-role=Started
clone cl-broker-vips broker-vips \
Hi all,
It seems like lib/pengine/clone.c/clone_print() doesn't respect pending
state of clone/ms resource instances in the cumulative output:
short_print(list_text, child_text, rsc->variant == pe_master ?
"Slaves" : "Started", options,
print_data);
in by-node output cr
03.01.2015 20:35, Dmitry Koterov wrote:
Hello.
Ubuntu 14.04, corosync 2.3.3, pacemaker 1.1.10. The cluster consists of
2 nodes (node1 and node2), when I run "crm node standby node2" and then,
in a minute, "crm node online node2", DRBD secondary on node2 does not
start. Logs say that "drbdadm -c
25.11.2014 23:41, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi!
is subj implemented?
Trying echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger on remote nodes and no fencing occurs.
Yes, fencing remote-nodes works. Are you certain your fencing devices can handle
fencing the remote-node? Fencing a remote-
27.11.2014 03:43, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> On 25 Nov 2014, at 10:37 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there any information how watchdog integration is intended to work?
>> What are currently-evaluated use-cases for that?
>> I
25.11.2014 12:54, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:...
>
> OK, let's switch tracks a bit. What *topics* do we actually have? Can we
> fill two days? Where would we want to collect them?
>
Just my 2c.
- It would be interesting to get some bird-view information
on what C APIs corosync and pacemaker current
26.11.2014 18:36, David Vossel wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> 25.11.2014 23:41, David Vossel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
Hi!
is subj implemented?
Trying echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger on remote nodes and no fencing occurs.
>>>
>>> Yes, fenc
26.11.2014 14:21, Daniel Dehennin wrote:
> Daniel Dehennin writes:
>
>>> I'll try find how to make the change directly in XML.
>>
>> Ok, looking at git history this feature seems only available on master
>> branch and not yet released.
>
> I do not have that feature on my pacemaker version.
>
>
25.11.2014 23:36, David Vossel wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> Daniel Dehennin writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> I have a 4 nodes cluster and some resources are only installed on 2 of
>>> them.
>>>
>>> I set cluster asymmetry and infinity location:
>>>
>>> primitive Mysq
25.11.2014 23:41, David Vossel wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> Hi!
>>
>> is subj implemented?
>>
>> Trying echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger on remote nodes and no fencing occurs.
>
> Yes, fencing remote-nodes works. Are you certain your fencing devices can
> handle
> fencing the remote
Hi,
Is there any information how watchdog integration is intended to work?
What are currently-evaluated use-cases for that?
It seems to be forcibly disabled id SBD is not detected...
Also, is there any way to make node (in one-node cluster ;) ) to suicide
if it detects fencing is required? Techni
Hi!
is subj implemented?
Trying echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger on remote nodes and no fencing occurs.
Best,
Vladislav
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://w
20.11.2014 09:25, Andrew Beekhof пишет:
>
>> On 20 Nov 2014, at 5:12 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>> 20.11.2014 01:57, Andrew Beekhof пишет:
>>>
>>>> On 19 Nov 2014, at 4:27 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>&
20.11.2014 01:57, Andrew Beekhof пишет:
>
>> On 19 Nov 2014, at 4:27 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> just an observation.
>>
>> I have a globally-unique clone with 50 instances in a cluster consisting
>> of one cluste
Hi all,
just an observation.
I have a globally-unique clone with 50 instances in a cluster consisting
of one cluster node and 3 remote bare-metal nodes.
When I run "crm_resource -C -r ''" (crmsh does that for me),
it writes that it expects to receive 50 answers (although it writes 4
lines for per
14.11.2014 17:36, David Vossel пишет:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> Hi!
>>
>> Just noticed that deletion of a trace_ra op attribute forces resource
>> to be restarted (that RA does not support reload).
>>
>> Logs show:
>> Nov 13 09:06:05 [6633] node01cib: info: cib_process_req
Hi!
Just noticed that deletion of a trace_ra op attribute forces resource
to be restarted (that RA does not support reload).
Logs show:
Nov 13 09:06:05 [6633] node01cib: info: cib_process_request:
Forwarding cib_apply_diff operation for section 'all' to master
(origin=local/cibad
12.11.2014 22:57, David Vossel wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> 12.11.2014 22:04, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>> Hi David, all,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to get resource-discovery="never" working with cd7c9ab, but
>>> stil
12.11.2014 22:04, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> Hi David, all,
>
> I'm trying to get resource-discovery="never" working with cd7c9ab, but still
> get "Not installed" probe failures from nodes which does not have
> corresponding resource agents installed.
Hi David, all,
I'm trying to get resource-discovery="never" working with cd7c9ab, but still
get "Not installed" probe failures from nodes which does not have
corresponding resource agents installed.
The only difference in my location constraints comparing to what is committed
in #589
is that the
11.11.2014 07:27, Sihan Goi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> DocumentRoot is still set to /var/www/html
> ls -al /var/www/html shows different things on the 2 nodes
> node01:
>
> total 28
> drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Nov 11 12:25 .
> drwxr-xr-x. 6 root root 4096 Jul 23 22:18 ..
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root5
23.10.2014 22:39, David Vossel wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> 21.10.2014 06:25, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>> 21.10.2014 05:15, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 20 Oct 2014, at 8:52 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov
>>>>> w
21.10.2014 06:25, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 21.10.2014 05:15, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>>> On 20 Oct 2014, at 8:52 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Andrew, David, all,
>>>
>>> It seems like #kind was introduced before bare-metal
21.10.2014 05:15, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> On 20 Oct 2014, at 8:52 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrew, David, all,
>>
>> It seems like #kind was introduced before bare-metal remote node
>> support, and now it is matched against "cluster&
Hi Andrew, David, all,
It seems like #kind was introduced before bare-metal remote node
support, and now it is matched against "cluster" and "container".
Bare-metal remote nodes match "container" (they are remote), but
strictly speaking they are not containers.
Could/should that attribute be exten
t; Last updated: Mon Sep 15 01:15:59 2014
> Last change: Sat Sep 13 15:23:45 2014 via cibadmin on node01
> Stack: corosync
> Current DC: node01 (167936788) - partition with quorum
> Version: 1.1.10-42f2063
> 2 Nodes configured
> 7 Resources configured
>
>
> Node node02 (16
}
> }
>
> Failover works on my initial test (restarting both nodes alternately
> - this always works). Will wait for a couple of hours after doing a
> failover test again (Which always fail on my previous setup).
>
> Thank you!
> Kiam
11.09.2014 05:57, Norbert Kiam Maclang wrote:
> Is this something to do with quorum? But I already set
You'd need to configure fencing at the drbd resources level.
http://www.drbd.org/users-guide-emb/s-pacemaker-fencing.html#s-pacemaker-fencing-cib
>
> property no-quorum-policy="ignore" \
> e
14.08.2014 10:35, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
>>> The load from the crmd is mostly from talking to the lrmd, which is
>>> dependant on resource placement rather than being (or not being) the DC.
>>
>> I've seen the different picture with 1024 unique clone instances. crmd's
>> CPU load on DC is muc
14.08.2014 05:24, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 14 Aug 2014, at 12:05 am, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:33:55AM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On 13 Aug 2014, at 2:02 am, Cédric Dufour - Idiap Research Institute
>>> wrote:
On 12/08/14 07:52, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
25.07.2014 02:20, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
>>> On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:00 pm, Arjun Pandey
>>> wrote:
>>>
Right. Actually the issue i am facing is that i am starting the
pacemaker service remotely from a wrapper and thus pacemakerd dies
>>
24.07.2014 03:39, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 23 Jul 2014, at 2:46 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 23.07.2014 05:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:45 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>>
>>>> 21.07.2014 08:36, Andrew
23.07.2014 05:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:45 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 21.07.2014 08:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 Jul 2014, at 2:50 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>>
>>>> 21.07.2014 06:28, Andrew
21.07.2014 13:37, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:09 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 21.07.2014 06:21, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18 Jul 2014, at 5:16 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Andrew, all,
>>
21.07.2014 08:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 21 Jul 2014, at 2:50 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 21.07.2014 06:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:45 pm, Arjun Pandey wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:36 PM,
21.07.2014 06:21, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 18 Jul 2014, at 5:16 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew, all,
>>
>> I have a task which seems to be easily solvable with the use of
>> globally-unique clone: start huge number of specific virtual m
21.07.2014 06:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:45 pm, Arjun Pandey wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:00 pm, Arjun Pandey wrote:
>>>
Right. Actually the issue i am facing is that i am starting the
pacemake
Hi Andrew, all,
I have a task which seems to be easily solvable with the use of
globally-unique clone: start huge number of specific virtual machines to
provide a load to a connection multiplexer.
I decided to look how pacemaker behaves in such setup with Dummy
resource agent, and found that hand
e specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Pacemaker digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>1. Re: crm resourse (lsb:apache2) not starting (Michael Monette)
>>2. Re: crm resourse (lsb:apache2) not starting (W Forum W)
>>3. Re: crm resou
08.07.2014 16:15, W Forum W wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a two node cluster with a DRBD, heartbeat and pacemaker (on
> Debian Wheezy)
> The cluster is working fine. 2 DRBD resources, Shared IP, 2 File systems
> and a postgresql database start, stop, migrate, ... correctly.
>
> Now the problem is with
30.06.2014 15:45, Tony Atkinson wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'd really appreciate a helping hand here
> I'm so close to getting what I need, but just seem to be falling short
> at the last hurdle.
>
> 2-node active/active cluster serving virtual machines (KVM via libvirt)
> Virtual machines need to be able
11.06.2014 16:26, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I am trying to deal somehow with split brain situation in 2 node cluster
> using votequorum.
> Here is a quorum section in my corosync.conf:
>
> provider: corosync_votequorum
> expected_votes: 2
Just a side note, not an answer to you
02.05.2014 03:47, ESWAR RAO wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am working on 3 node cluster with corosync+pacemaker on RHEL 6.
> Eventhough I applied anti-affinity the app is still trying to run on 3rd
> node.
>
> # rpm -qa|grep corosync
> corosync-1.4.1-17.el6_5.1.x86_64
> corosynclib-1.4.1-17.el6_5.1.x86_6
23.04.2014 13:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> I'd like to get a release out in the next month or so, so expect a release
> candidate RealSoonNow(tm).
>
> The last item on my personal todo list is updating the ACL syntax to make the
> terms a little more generic (since it won't just be users anymore)
12.03.2014 00:40, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 11 Mar 2014, at 6:23 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 07.03.2014 10:30, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>> 07.03.2014 05:43, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 6 Mar 2014, at 10:39 pm, Vladislav Bo
12.03.2014 00:37, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
> I'm somewhat confused at this point if crmsh is using --replace, then why
> is it doing diff calculations?
> Or are replace operations only for the load operation?
It uses on of two methods depending on pacemaker version.
___
07.03.2014 10:30, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 07.03.2014 05:43, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 6 Mar 2014, at 10:39 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>>> 18.02.2014 03:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 31 Jan 2014, at 6:20 pm, yusuke iid
07.03.2014 05:43, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 6 Mar 2014, at 10:39 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 18.02.2014 03:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 31 Jan 2014, at 6:20 pm, yusuke iida wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, all
>>>>
>>
18.02.2014 03:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 31 Jan 2014, at 6:20 pm, yusuke iida wrote:
>
>> Hi, all
>>
>> I measure the performance of Pacemaker in the following combinations.
>> Pacemaker-1.1.11.rc1
>> libqb-0.16.0
>> corosync-2.3.2
>>
>> All nodes are KVM virtual machines.
>>
>> stopped t
21.02.2014 13:45, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2014-02-21T13:02:23, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> It could be nice feature to have kind of general SLA concept (it could
>> be very similar to the utilization one from the resource configuration
>> perspective), so resou
21.02.2014 02:58, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 20 Feb 2014, at 7:34 pm, Dan Markhasin wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am wondering if it is possible to configure complex/custom migration
>> rules, so resources would migrate in case there is a problem with the
>> current node it is running on.
>>
>> i.
Hi Fabio,
19.02.2014 12:32, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> On 2/19/2014 9:39 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
>> On 2/18/2014 9:24 PM, Asgaroth wrote:
Just a guess. Do you have startup fencing enabled in dlm-controld (I
actually
do not remember if it is applicable to cman's version, b
18.02.2014 23:24, Asgaroth wrote:
>>
>> Just a guess. Do you have startup fencing enabled in dlm-controld (I actually
>> do not remember if it is applicable to cman's version, but it exists in
>> dlm-4) or
>> cman?
>> If yes, then that may play its evil game, because imho it is not intended to
>>
18.02.2014 23:01, David Vossel wrote:
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Vladislav Bogdanov" To:
>> pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014
>> 1:02:09 PM Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] node1 fencing itself after
&g
18.02.2014 19:49, Asgaroth wrote:
>> i sometimes have the same situation. sleep ~30 seconds between startup
>> cman and clvmd helps a lot.
>>
>
> Thanks for the tip, I just tried this (added sleep 30 in the start
> section of case statement in cman script, but this did not resolve the
> issue for
18.02.2014 12:22, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 18 Feb 2014, at 8:18 pm, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>
>> On 18 Feb 2014, at 7:40 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>>> 18.02.2014 03:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 31 Jan 2014, at 6
18.02.2014 03:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 31 Jan 2014, at 6:20 pm, yusuke iida wrote:
>
>> Hi, all
>>
>> I measure the performance of Pacemaker in the following combinations.
>> Pacemaker-1.1.11.rc1
>> libqb-0.16.0
>> corosync-2.3.2
>>
>> All nodes are KVM virtual machines.
>>
>> stopped t
17.02.2014 04:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 11 Feb 2014, at 2:49 am, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> cannot find anywhere (am I blind?), is it possible to manually inject
>> 'reload' op for a given resource?
>>
>> Background
29.01.2014 08:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
>
> Thats a known deficiency in the v1 diff format (and why we need costly
> digests to detect ordering changes).
> Happily .12 will have a new and improve diff format that will handle this
> correctly.
Does your recent cib-performance rewrite address
10.02.2014 18:54, Asgaroth wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vladislav Bogdanov [mailto:bub...@hoster-ok.com]
> Sent: 10 February 2014 13:27
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] node1 fencing itself after node2 being fenced
>
>
Hi,
cannot find anywhere (am I blind?), is it possible to manually inject
'reload' op for a given resource?
Background for this is if some configuration files are edited, and
resource-agent (or LSB script) supports 'reload' operation, then it
would be nice to have a way to request that reload to
10.02.2014 14:46, Asgaroth wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> OK, here is my testing using cman/clvmd enabled on system startup and
> clvmd outside of pacemaker control. I still seem to be getting the clvmd
> hang/fail situation even when running outside of pacemaker control, I
> cannot see off-hand wher
07.02.2014 14:22, Asgaroth wrote:
...
>
> Thanks for the explanation, this is interresting for me as I need a
> volume manager in the cluster to manager the shared file systems in case
> I need to resize for some reason. I think I may be coming up against
> something similar now that I am testing
05.02.2014 20:10, Asgaroth wrote:
> On 05/02/2014 16:12, Digimer wrote:
>> You say it's working now? If so, excellent. If you have any troubles
>> though, please share your cluster.conf and 'pcs config show'.
>>
>
> Hi Digimer, no its not working as I expect it to when I test a crash of
> node 2,
Hi all,
Just discovered, that when I add resource to a middle of
(running) group, it is added to the end.
I mean, if I update following (crmsh syntax)
group dhcp-server vip-10-5-200-244 dhcpd
with
group dhcp-server vip-10-5-200-244 vip-10-5-201-244 dhcpd
with 'crm configure load update', actu
Hi,
This is the only one message I see in logs in otherwise static cluster
(with rechecks enabled), probably it is good idea to downgrade it to info.
diff --git a/lib/pengine/unpack.c b/lib/pengine/unpack.c
index 97e114f..6dbcf19 100644
--- a/lib/pengine/unpack.c
+++ b/lib/pengine/unpack.c
@@ -25
10.01.2014 13:55, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 10.01.2014, 14:31, "Andrey Groshev" :
>> 10.01.2014, 14:01, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>>
>>> On 10 Jan 2014, at 5:03 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
10.01.2014, 05:29, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>On 9 Jan 2014, at 11:11 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>>
10.01.2014 08:00, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 10 Jan 2014, at 3:51 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 10.01.2014, 03:28, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>>> On 9 Jan 2014, at 4:44 pm, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>>>
09.01.2014, 02:39, "Andrew Beekhof" :
> On 18 Dec 2013, at 11:55 pm, Andrey Groshev
03.01.2014 07:46, Digimer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While trying to test to answer questions from my previous thread, I
> hit another problem. Since posting the first thread, I moved on in the
> Cluster from Scratch tutorial and got to the point where I was running
> Active/Active.
>
> Here I have
02.01.2014 12:53, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:41:20 +0300
> Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> I would expect that only one option is modified, but crmsh intend to
>> remove all others.
>>
>> May be it is possible to fix it by one-line crm
27.12.2013 09:45, Digimer wrote:
> On 27/12/13 01:44 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>> 27.12.2013 09:34, Digimer wrote:
>> ...
>>> 3. I know I mentioned this on IRC before, but I thought I should mention
>>> it here again. In the pcs CfS, it shows to set:
>>&g
27.12.2013 09:34, Digimer wrote:
...
> 3. I know I mentioned this on IRC before, but I thought I should mention
> it here again. In the pcs CfS, it shows to set:
>
>
>
>SetHandler server-status
>Order deny,allow
>Deny from all
>Allow from 127.0.0.1
>
>
>
> But then in
20.12.2013 14:15, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just discovered that it is possible to remove options in subject with
> admin action (at least with cibadmin --patch).
>
> This is notably annoying when updating CIB with 'crm configure load
> update' (whic
Hi all,
Just discovered that it is possible to remove options in subject with
admin action (at least with cibadmin --patch).
This is notably annoying when updating CIB with 'crm configure load
update' (which uses crm_diff to create patch) when updating other
cluster options.
While most (all?) ot
18.12.2013 23:21, Rainer Brestan wrote:
> Hi Lars,
> maybe a little off topic.
>
> What i really miss in crmsh is the possibility to specify resource
> parameters which are different on different nodes, so the parameter is
> node dependant.
> In XML syntax this is existing, Andrew gave me the hin
13.12.2013 15:39, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-12-13T13:11:30, Rainer Brestan wrote:
>
>> Please do not merge colocation and order together in a way that only none or
>> both is present.
>
> This was never the plan.
>
> The idea was to offer an additional construct that provides both
> p
rder 1 4 2 3 and replace
"primitives' with "clones" in latter two.
>
> But I couldn't understand why pacemaker is giving errors with this type
> of configuration.
>
> Thanks
> Eswar
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov <
h a score of 500: it stopped only dummy_2 and restarted dummy_2 on node2.
>
>
> Thanks
> Eswar
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:20 PM, ESWAR RAO <mailto:eswar7...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Vladislav.
> I will work on that.
>
&g
06.12.2013 19:13, James Oakley wrote:
> On Thursday, December 5, 2013 9:55:47 PM "Vladislav Bogdanov"
> wrote:
>
>> Does 'db0' resolve to a correct IP address? If not, then you probably
>> want either fix that or use remote-addr option as well. I saw tha
06.12.2013 11:41, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-12-06T08:55:47, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> BTW, pacemaker cib accepts any meta attributes (and that is very
>> convenient way for me to store some 'meta' information), while crmsh
>> limits them to
1 - 100 of 446 matches
Mail list logo
