Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
Using ordering_set and colocation_set, is it impossible to perform
movement same as ordered=false of the group resource?
Yes, because they're not the same thing.
Setting sequential=false is not at all like setting ordered=false.
Setting
On 08/04/2013, at 4:11 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
Using ordering_set and colocation_set, is it impossible to perform
movement same as ordered=false of the group resource?
Yes, because they're not the same thing.
Setting
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
Oh!
I somehow failed to recognise that you were using 1.0
There is a reasonable chance that 1.1 behaves better in this regard.
I also notice, now, that the resources are still in a group - deleting the
ordering constraint achieves nothing if the
On 22/03/2013, at 3:17 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
We demand time and the same movement that appointed ordered=false of the
group resource.
* Case 0 - group : orderded=false
* At the time of orderded=false, it takes start of vip-rep.
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
Using ordering_set and colocation_set, is it impossible to perform movement
same as ordered=false of the group resource?
Yes, because they're not the same thing.
Setting sequential=false is not at all like setting ordered=false.
Setting
On 08/04/2013, at 2:52 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
Using ordering_set and colocation_set, is it impossible to perform movement
same as ordered=false of the group resource?
Yes, because they're not the same thing.
Setting
Hi Andrew,
I registered this question with Bugzilla.
* http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5147
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Thu, 2013/3/14, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp
wrote:
Hi Andrew,
In colocation, I used resource_set.
However, a result
On Thursday, March 7, 2013, wrote:
Hi Andrew,
You use the resource sets _instead_ of a group.
If you want group.ordered=false, then use a colocation set (with
sequential=true).
In colocation, I used resource_set.
However, a result did not include the change.
Will this result be a
Hi Andrew,
Thank your for comments.
You use the resource sets _instead_ of a group.
If you want group.ordered=false, then use a colocation set (with
sequential=true).
In colocation, I used resource_set.
However, a result did not include the change.
Will this result be a mistake of
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:34 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thank your for comments.
You use the resource sets _instead_ of a group.
If you want group.ordered=false, then use a colocation set (with
sequential=true).
In colocation, I used resource_set.
However, a
Hi Andrew,
Thank your for comment.
Sorry, I'm not sure I understand the question.
Sorry
When we use resource_set in substitution for ordered of a thing of group
resource, do we use colocation set?
Or do we use ordering set ?
It does not seem to do work same as group ordered=fase if it
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:02 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thank your for comment.
Sorry, I'm not sure I understand the question.
Sorry
When we use resource_set in substitution for ordered of a thing of group
resource, do we use colocation set?
Or do we use
Hi Andrew,
In colocation, I used resource_set.
However, a result did not include the change.
Please, about the result that I tried, give me comment.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Thu, 2013/3/7, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp
wrote:
Hi Andrew,
You use the
Hi Andrew,
I tried resource_set sequential designation.
* http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/84578
I caused an error in start of the vip-master resource and confirmed movement.
(snip)
group id=master-group
primitive class=ocf id=vip-master
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:27 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I tried resource_set sequential designation.
* http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/84578
I caused an error in start of the vip-master resource and confirmed movement.
(snip)
Oh!
You use the resource sets _instead_ of a group.
If you want group.ordered=false, then use a colocation set (with
sequential=true).
If you want group.colocated=false, then use an ordering set (with
sequential=true).
Hope that helps :)
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:16 PM,
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comment.
It was colocation.
I make modifications and confirm movement.
Many Thanks!
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Thu, 2013/3/7, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Oh!
You use the resource sets _instead_ of a group.
If you want group.ordered=false, then use a
Hi Andrew,
You use the resource sets _instead_ of a group.
If you want group.ordered=false, then use a colocation set (with
sequential=true).
In colocation, I used resource_set.
However, a result did not include the change.
Will this result be a mistake of my setting?
Case 1)
18 matches
Mail list logo
