Hi Andrew,
I registered a demand with Bugzilla.
* http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5158
Many Thanks!
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Fri, 2013/5/24, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> > > To Andrew :
> > > If you make a patch removing a block of the file handling of pengi
Hi Andrew,
> > To Andrew :
> > If you make a patch removing a block of the file handling of pengine, I
> > confirm the movement.
> > If a problem is evaded without using tmpfs, many users welcome it.
> >
>
> You mean this patch? https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/c7e10c6
> Or another
On 24/05/2013, at 2:58 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Hi Vladislav,
>
>> We test movement when we located pe file in tmpfs repeatedly.
>> It seems to move well for the moment.
>
> I only adopted tmpfs, and the I/O block of pengine was improved.
> I confirm the synchronizat
22.05.2013 09:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 17/05/2013, at 4:17 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> P.S. Andrew, is this patch ok to apply?
>
> https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/c7e10c6 :)
Awesome.
Thanks.
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pa
24.05.2013 07:58, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Hi Vladislav,
>
>> We test movement when we located pe file in tmpfs repeatedly.
>> It seems to move well for the moment.
>
> I only adopted tmpfs, and the I/O block of pengine was improved.
Great that it helped.
> I confirm the
Hi Andrew,
Hi Vladislav,
> We test movement when we located pe file in tmpfs repeatedly.
> It seems to move well for the moment.
I only adopted tmpfs, and the I/O block of pengine was improved.
I confirm the synchronization with the fixed file, but think that there is not
the problem from now on
Hi Andrew,
Hi Vladislav,
We test movement when we located pe file in tmpfs repeatedly.
It seems to move well for the moment.
I confirm movement a little more, and we are going to try the method that Mr.
Vladislav synchronizes.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Wed, 2013/5/22, Andrew Beekhof
On 17/05/2013, at 4:17 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> P.S. Andrew, is this patch ok to apply?
https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/c7e10c6 :)
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinf
Hi Vladislav,
> For just this, patch is unneeded. It only plays when you have that
> pengine files symlinked from stable storage to tmpfs, Without patch,
> pengine would try to rewrite file where symlink points it - directly on
> a stable storage. With that patch, pengine will remove symlink (and
Hi Hideo-san,
17.05.2013 10:29, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Vladislav,
>
> Thank you for advice.
>
> I try the patch which you showed.
>
> We use Pacemaker1.0, but apply a patch there because there is a similar code.
>
> If there is a question by setting, I ask you a question by an
Hi Vladislav,
Thank you for advice.
I try the patch which you showed.
We use Pacemaker1.0, but apply a patch there because there is a similar code.
If there is a question by setting, I ask you a question by an email.
* At first I only use tmpfs, and I intend to test it.
> P.S. Andrew, is this
Hi Hideo-san,
You may try the following patch (with trick below)
>From 2c4418d11c491658e33c149f63e6a2f2316ef310 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vladislav Bogdanov
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 05:58:34 +
Subject: [PATCH] Feature: PE: Unlink pengine output files before writing.
This should help guys
On 17/05/2013, at 10:27 AM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Hi Vladislav,
>
> I try whether this correction is effective for this problem.
> *
> https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/eb6264bf2db395779e65dadf1c626e050a388c59
>
Doubtful, it just reduces code duplication.
Hi Andrew,
Hi Vladislav,
I try whether this correction is effective for this problem.
*
https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/eb6264bf2db395779e65dadf1c626e050a388c59
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Thu, 2013/5/16, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 16/05/2013, at 3:49 PM, Vladislav Bo
On 16/05/2013, at 3:49 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 16.05.2013 02:46, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 15/05/2013, at 6:44 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>>> 15.05.2013 11:18, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 15/05/2013, at 5:31 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 15.05.2013 10:2
16.05.2013 02:46, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 15/05/2013, at 6:44 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 15.05.2013 11:18, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15/05/2013, at 5:31 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>>
15.05.2013 10:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 15/05/2013, at 3:50 PM, Vlad
On 15/05/2013, at 6:44 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 15.05.2013 11:18, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 15/05/2013, at 5:31 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>>> 15.05.2013 10:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 15/05/2013, at 3:50 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 15.05.2013 08:2
15.05.2013 11:18, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 15/05/2013, at 5:31 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 15.05.2013 10:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15/05/2013, at 3:50 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>>
15.05.2013 08:23, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 15/05/2013, at 3:11 PM, rena
15.05.2013 11:18, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 15/05/2013, at 5:31 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 15.05.2013 10:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15/05/2013, at 3:50 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>>
15.05.2013 08:23, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 15/05/2013, at 3:11 PM, rena
On 15/05/2013, at 5:31 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 15.05.2013 10:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 15/05/2013, at 3:50 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>>> 15.05.2013 08:23, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 15/05/2013, at 3:11 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Andre
15.05.2013 10:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 15/05/2013, at 3:50 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 15.05.2013 08:23, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15/05/2013, at 3:11 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>>>
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
>> The guest located i
On 15/05/2013, at 3:50 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 15.05.2013 08:23, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 15/05/2013, at 3:11 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> Thank you for comments.
>>>
> The guest located it to the shared disk.
What is on the sha
15.05.2013 08:23, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 15/05/2013, at 3:11 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Thank you for comments.
>>
The guest located it to the shared disk.
>>>
>>> What is on the shared disk? The whole OS or app-specific data (i.e.
>>> nothing pacemak
Hi Andrew,
> > Thank you for comments.
> >
> >>> The guest located it to the shared disk.
> >>
> >> What is on the shared disk? The whole OS or app-specific data (i.e.
> >> nothing pacemaker needs directly)?
> >
> > Shared disk has all the OS and the all data.
>
> Oh. I can imagine that bein
On 15/05/2013, at 3:11 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for comments.
>
>>> The guest located it to the shared disk.
>>
>> What is on the shared disk? The whole OS or app-specific data (i.e. nothing
>> pacemaker needs directly)?
>
> Shared disk has all the OS
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comments.
> > The guest located it to the shared disk.
>
> What is on the shared disk? The whole OS or app-specific data (i.e. nothing
> pacemaker needs directly)?
Shared disk has all the OS and the all data.
The placement of this shared disk is similar in KVM where t
On 13/05/2013, at 4:14 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We constituted a simple cluster in environment of vSphere5.1.
>
> We composed it of two ESXi servers and shared disk.
>
> The guest located it to the shared disk.
What is on the shared disk? The whole OS or app-specif
Hi All,
We constituted a simple cluster in environment of vSphere5.1.
We composed it of two ESXi servers and shared disk.
The guest located it to the shared disk.
Step 1) Constitute a cluster.(A DC node is an active node.)
Last updated: Mon May 13 14:16:09 2013
Stack: Heartbeat
C
28 matches
Mail list logo