Re: [Pacemaker] Failover with multiple services on one node

2010-03-08 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 03:21:32PM +0800, Martin Aspeli wrote: Matthew Palmer wrote: What is the normal way to handle this? Do people have one floating IP address per service? This is how I prefer to do it. RFC1918 IP addresses are cheap, IPv6 address quintuply so. Having everything tied

Re: [Pacemaker] Failover with multiple services on one node

2010-03-08 Thread Martin Aspeli
Matthew Palmer wrote: On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 03:21:32PM +0800, Martin Aspeli wrote: Matthew Palmer wrote: What is the normal way to handle this? Do people have one floating IP address per service? This is how I prefer to do it. RFC1918 IP addresses are cheap, IPv6 address quintuply so.

[Pacemaker] Failover with multiple services on one node

2010-03-07 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hi, This question was sort of implied in my thread last week, but I'm going to re-ask it properly, to reduce my own confusion if nothing else. We have two servers, master and slave. In the cluster, we have: - A shared IP address (192.168.245.10) - HAProxy (active on master, may fail over

Re: [Pacemaker] Failover with multiple services on one node

2010-03-07 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 01:34:01PM +0800, Martin Aspeli wrote: This question was sort of implied in my thread last week, but I'm going to re-ask it properly, to reduce my own confusion if nothing else. We have two servers, master and slave. In the cluster, we have: [bunchteen services, some

Re: [Pacemaker] Failover with multiple services on one node

2010-03-07 Thread Martin Aspeli
Matthew Palmer wrote: On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 01:34:01PM +0800, Martin Aspeli wrote: This question was sort of implied in my thread last week, but I'm going to re-ask it properly, to reduce my own confusion if nothing else. We have two servers, master and slave. In the cluster, we have: