Re: [Pacemaker] Ressources not moving to node with better connectivity - pingd

2013-12-09 Thread Bauer, Stefan (IZLBW Extern)
Thank you for your time! It works now :) Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Michael Schwartzkopff [mailto:m...@sys4.de] Gesendet: Montag, 9. Dezember 2013 14:26 An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Ressources not moving to node with better connectivity

Re: [Pacemaker] Ressources not moving to node with better connectivity - pingd

2013-12-09 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Montag, 9. Dezember 2013, 13:06:04 schrieb Bauer, Stefan: > Why are some resources listed more than once in the output? > What is the difference between group_color and native_color? > If a resource has a value of -INFINITY is it because the cluster already > decided that this resource should no

Re: [Pacemaker] Ressources not moving to node with better connectivity - pingd

2013-12-09 Thread Bauer, Stefan (IZLBW Extern)
Why are some resources listed more than once in the output? What is the difference between group_color and native_color? If a resource has a value of -INFINITY is it because the cluster already decided that this resource should not run on this host or it can not run on this host due to other reas

Re: [Pacemaker] Ressources not moving to node with better connectivity - pingd

2013-12-09 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Montag, 9. Dezember 2013, 11:27:51 schrieb Bauer, Stefan: > Hi Michael, > > so that means, either increasing one value or lower the other right? > Or is lowering resource_stickiness the only reasonable way? > > I tried a multiplier of 1000 but no change in the behavior. > > Stefan > > -U

Re: [Pacemaker] Ressources not moving to node with better connectivity - pingd

2013-12-09 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-12-09T10:28:32, "Bauer, Stefan (IZLBW Extern)" wrote: > location groupwithping cluster1 \ > rule $id="groupwithping-rule" pingd: defined pingd I tend to prefer a -inf score for nodes where pingd is *not* defined or zero. (Downside is that when you lose all connectivity, all ser

Re: [Pacemaker] Ressources not moving to node with better connectivity - pingd

2013-12-09 Thread Bauer, Stefan (IZLBW Extern)
Hi Michael, so that means, either increasing one value or lower the other right? Or is lowering resource_stickiness the only reasonable way? I tried a multiplier of 1000 but no change in the behavior. Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Michael Schwartzkopff [mailto:m...@sys4.de] You

Re: [Pacemaker] Ressources not moving to node with better connectivity - pingd

2013-12-09 Thread emmanuel segura
ster inf: p_eth0 p_alias0 p_openvpn p_conntrackd > > property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \ > > dc-version="1.1.7-ee0730e13d124c3d58f00016c3376a1de5323cff" \ > > cluster-infrastructure="openais" \ > > expected-quorum-vote

Re: [Pacemaker] Ressources not moving to node with better connectivity - pingd

2013-12-09 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
r inf: p_eth0 p_alias0 p_openvpn p_conntrackd > property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \ > dc-version="1.1.7-ee0730e13d124c3d58f00016c3376a1de5323cff" \ > cluster-infrastructure="openais" \ > expected-quorum-votes="2" \ >

Re: [Pacemaker] Ressources not moving to node with better connectivity - pingd

2013-12-09 Thread Bauer, Stefan (IZLBW Extern)
$id="groupwithping-rule" pingd: defined pingd colocation cluster inf: p_eth0 p_alias0 p_openvpn p_conntrackd property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \ dc-version="1.1.7-ee0730e13d124c3d58f00016c3376a1de5323cff" \ cluster-infrastructure="openais"

Re: [Pacemaker] Ressources not moving to node with better connectivity - pingd

2013-12-09 Thread emmanuel segura
where is your config? 2013/12/9 Bauer, Stefan (IZLBW Extern) > Hi List, > > > > even though following well known documentations about a ping clone > resource my resources are not moving to the node with the better > connectivity: > > > > 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes > > 6 Resources con

[Pacemaker] Ressources not moving to node with better connectivity - pingd

2013-12-09 Thread Bauer, Stefan (IZLBW Extern)
Hi List, even though following well known documentations about a ping clone resource my resources are not moving to the node with the better connectivity: 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes 6 Resources configured. Online: [ debian6-n2 debian6-n1 ] Resource Group: cluster1 p