On 22 Jan 2014, at 10:54 am, Brian J. Murrell (brian) br...@interlinx.bc.ca
wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:49 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
What crm_mon are you looking at?
I see stuff like:
virt-fencing (stonith:fence_xvm):Started rhos4-node3
Resource Group: mysql-group
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 17:11 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Consider any long running action, such as starting a database.
We do not update the CIB until after actions have completed, so there can and
will be times when the status section is out of date to one degree or another.
But that is
On 16 Jan 2014, at 6:53 am, Brian J. Murrell (brian) br...@interlinx.bc.ca
wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 17:11 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Consider any long running action, such as starting a database.
We do not update the CIB until after actions have completed, so there can
and will be
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 08:35 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I know, I was giving you another example of when the cib is not completely
up-to-date with reality.
Yeah, I understood that. I was just countering with why that example is
actually more acceptable.
It may very well be partially
On 16 Jan 2014, at 1:13 pm, Brian J. Murrell (brian) br...@interlinx.bc.ca
wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 08:35 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I know, I was giving you another example of when the cib is not completely
up-to-date with reality.
Yeah, I understood that. I was just countering
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 16:01 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 08:09 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
The local cib hasn't caught up yet by the looks of it.
I should have asked in my previous message: is this entirely an artifact
of having just restarted or are there any
On 14 Jan 2014, at 11:50 pm, Brian J. Murrell (brian) br...@interlinx.bc.ca
wrote:
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 16:01 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 08:09 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
The local cib hasn't caught up yet by the looks of it.
I should have asked in my
Hi,
I found a situation using pacemaker 1.1.10 on RHEL6.5 where the output
of crm_resource -L is not trust-able, shortly after a node is booted.
Here is the output from crm_resource -L on one of the nodes in a two
node cluster (the one that was not rebooted):
st-fencing
On 14 Jan 2014, at 5:13 am, Brian J. Murrell (brian) br...@interlinx.bc.ca
wrote:
Hi,
I found a situation using pacemaker 1.1.10 on RHEL6.5 where the output
of crm_resource -L is not trust-able, shortly after a node is booted.
Here is the output from crm_resource -L on one of the nodes
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 08:09 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
The local cib hasn't caught up yet by the looks of it.
Should crm_resource actually be [mis-]reporting as if it were
knowledgeable when it's not though? IOW is this expected behaviour or
should it be considered a bug? Should I open a
On 14 Jan 2014, at 3:41 pm, Brian J. Murrell (brian) br...@interlinx.bc.ca
wrote:
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 08:09 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
The local cib hasn't caught up yet by the looks of it.
Should crm_resource actually be [mis-]reporting as if it were
knowledgeable when it's not
11 matches
Mail list logo
