Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555059
--- Comment #28 from Nathanael Noblet 2010-06-16 02:17:25
EDT ---
Sounds good, I'm out of town till next monday so will restart
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896
--- Comment #35 from Mark Goodwin 2010-06-16 02:07:31 EDT
---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: pc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896
Mark Goodwin changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592672
--- Comment #5 from Shakthi Kannan 2010-06-16 01:08:14
EDT ---
@Petr: Thanks for the wonderful explanation and prompt reply.
I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566598
--- Comment #8 from Germán Racca 2010-06-16 01:03:55 EDT ---
Who can review this?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redha
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: gtk-chtheme - Gtk+ 2.0 theme preview and selection
made slick
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604501
Summary: Review Request: gtk-c
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541724
--- Comment #8 from Germán Racca 2010-06-16 00:55:45 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> German, can you please open a review req
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604500
--- Comment #1 from fujiwara 2010-06-16 00:55:02 EDT ---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2252863
--
Configu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ibus-input-pad - Input Pad for IBus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604500
Summary: Review Request: ibus-input-pad - Input Pad for I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243
--- Comment #34 from Chen Lei 2010-06-15 23:36:33 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #33)
> As soname deps are automatically handled
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243
--- Comment #33 from Kalev Lember 2010-06-15 23:28:28 EDT
---
As soname deps are automatically handled by rpm, I bet most of th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243
--- Comment #32 from Chen Lei 2010-06-15 22:45:13 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #31)
> Right now -tools subpackages has Obsolet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577152
--- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember 2010-06-15 22:45:01 EDT
---
Updated to 0.6.0.
Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/apiextr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243
--- Comment #31 from Kalev Lember 2010-06-15 22:25:29 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #30)
> (In reply to comment #29)
> > (In rep
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243
--- Comment #30 from Chen Lei 2010-06-15 22:17:01 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #29)
> (In reply to comment #28)
> > Packages ne
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570017
--- Comment #10 from Kalev Lember 2010-06-15 22:00:22 EDT
---
> Version:0
Why 0? In
http://grumpypenguin.org/index.php?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570017
--- Comment #9 from Kalev Lember 2010-06-15 21:54:05 EDT
---
How did you determine this is GPLv2? The source files say either:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243
--- Comment #29 from Kalev Lember 2010-06-15 21:36:13 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #28)
> Packages need fix after review, most
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570017
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555059
--- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-06-15
21:08:21 EDT ---
You can base on the srpm you want to use (i.e. either will do).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476600
Conrad Meyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604331
Thomas Spura changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555059
--- Comment #26 from Nathanael Noblet 2010-06-15 18:21:20
EDT ---
For sure. Should I take he latest posted spec or can we go ba
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-scaffold - Scaffold is a templating tool for
Puppet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604438
Summary: Review Request: rubygem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585518
Benjamín Valero Espinosa changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593841
Christoph Wickert changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: redshift - Adjusts the color temperature of your
screen according to time of day
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604331
Summary: Re
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598688
--- Comment #4 from Niels de Vos 2010-06-15 16:35:21 EDT ---
Thanks Mark and Randall,
I guess the should be licensed as LGPLv2+
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593841
--- Comment #37 from David Cantrell 2010-06-15 16:33:45
EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: w
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593841
--- Comment #36 from David Cantrell 2010-06-15 16:33:29
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #35)
> (In reply to comment #32)
> > New P
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547655
--- Comment #10 from Xavier Bachelot 2010-06-15 16:20:09
EDT ---
Hi Ralf, it seems it dropped off your radar again. I'd be grat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593841
--- Comment #35 from leigh scott 2010-06-15
15:41:44 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> New Package CVS Request
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538557
--- Comment #9 from Serguei Shimansky 2010-06-15
15:45:04 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Spec URL:
> http://englishextra.or
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538557
Serguei Shimansky changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580681
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480
--- Comment #38 from Michal Schmidt 2010-06-15 14:52:10
EDT ---
Formal review of spectrum-0.3-0.7.git20100614:
Summary
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #18 from Martin Gieseking 2010-06-15
14:10:39 EDT ---
Thanks for clarifying the license issue.
Please update the p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603269
--- Comment #4 from Gerd Pokorra 2010-06-15 14:07:38
EDT ---
The tests finishes successful.
old SPEC file URL: ftp://ftp.uni-s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555059
--- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-06-15
12:35:53 EDT ---
Nathanael, would you interested in importing this package
into F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604227
Summary: Review Request: -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570457
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604227
Serguei Shimansky changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592672
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar 2010-06-15 12:58:40 EDT ---
> Sorry, I didn't understand the difference.
Problem is not with 'co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570111
Bug 570111 depends on bug 570457, which changed state.
Bug 570457 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-right_rackspace - Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588474
--- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-06-15
12:48:21 EDT ---
Adam, would you have some time for your review requests?
--
Co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564518
--- Comment #3 from Nathaniel McCallum 2010-06-15
12:45:30 EDT ---
the "E: no-binary" error is occurring because of the way Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604227
Serguei Shimansky changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292
Nathaniel McCallum changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564518
--- Comment #2 from Ian Weller 2010-06-15 12:24:43 EDT ---
It should be noted that the previous review is an unofficial review a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602767
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590832
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590832
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System
2010-06-15 12:07:15 EDT ---
iapetal-1.0-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stabl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602356
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System
2010-06-15 12:06:05 EDT ---
gst123-0.1.0-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602348
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602356
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602348
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System
2010-06-15 12:05:30 EDT ---
rubygem-net-ssh-2.0.23-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590832
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590832
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System
2010-06-15 12:02:44 EDT ---
iapetal-1.0-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stabl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603859
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603860
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603859
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-15
11:57:44 EDT ---
iwl6050-firmware-9.201.4.1-2.fc13 has been pushed to the F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603860
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2010-06-15
11:57:16 EDT ---
iwl6050-firmware-9.201.4.1-2.fc12 has been pushed to the F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564518
Nathaniel McCallum changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501101
Arun SAG changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592672
--- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan 2010-06-15 11:30:26
EDT ---
Upstream was forked into couple of new designs, and hasn't made
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602767
Marcela Mašláňová changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592672
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540539
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554464
--- Comment #13 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2010-06-15
10:46:05 EDT ---
There's a conf.py file that configures sphinx. In that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602574
--- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2010-06-15
10:22:57 EDT ---
Hi Jeremy,
I just found two more things that need some attent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554464
--- Comment #12 from Tadej Janež 2010-06-15
10:01:27 EDT ---
Toshio, thank you for the patch!
I put a new version of the .spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476600
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243
--- Comment #28 from Chen Lei 2010-06-15 09:28:17 EDT
---
Packages need fix after review, most of those packages actually don't
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243
--- Comment #27 from Chen Lei 2010-06-15 09:09:49 EDT
---
formal review here:
+:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing
MUST Ite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484598
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547118
Damien Durand changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Synopsis - Test your SYNOPSIS code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604093
Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Synopsis - Te
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602703
--- Comment #7 from Shakthi Kannan 2010-06-15 08:01:05
EDT ---
@Petr: That worked! Thanks for your prompt response!
--
Config
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541724
--- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2010-06-15
07:37:01 EDT ---
German, can you please open a review request and cc me?
--
Co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602703
--- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar 2010-06-15 07:28:38 EDT ---
Ok, the full working example is:
use HTTP::Parser;
my $parser = HT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #17 from Fabian Affolter 2010-06-15
07:15:02 EDT ---
According to upstream everything is GPLv3+.
https://garage.ma
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549296
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547118
--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2010-06-15
07:19:28 EDT ---
Any particular reason to not build this package and close the r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549296
--- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2010-06-15
07:13:49 EDT ---
Thanks for the review Thomas.
--
Configure bugmail: https://b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602703
--- Comment #5 from Shakthi Kannan 2010-06-15 06:12:47
EDT ---
I get the following output, after changing 'while' with 'foreach
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602703
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602703
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar 2010-06-15 05:53:24 EDT ---
Thanks for report. Just replace the `while' with `foreach'.
https://
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603295
--- Comment #3 from Stanislav Ochotnicky 2010-06-15
05:24:18 EDT ---
I just realized one more thing you will have to do. Provid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602703
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: openemr - Practice Management, Electronic Medical
Record
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604033
Summary: Review Request: openemr -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-kprayertime - Displays Islamic prayer Time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604031
Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-kpr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602703
Yanko Kaneti changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592672
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573910
--- Comment #6 from Per Inge Mathisen 2010-06-15
03:43:54 EDT ---
Hi. Good to see this ball rolling again :)
pdcmtk contains o
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351
--- Comment #53 from Peter Lemenkov 2010-06-15 03:52:41
EDT ---
Bogus "manual" sub-package's description still exists.
--
Con
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569671
--- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking 2010-06-15
03:42:23 EDT ---
OK, that's fine. Thanks for the info.
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569671
--- Comment #7 from Fabian Deutsch 2010-06-15 03:38:24
EDT ---
Hi, yes I am. I waited for upstream to change it's name, to solv
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569671
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
98 matches
Mail list logo
