https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #6 from Mattia Meneguzzo mattia.meneguzzo+fed...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Your packages have to depend on the base package:
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834747
Bug ID: 834747
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834747
Julian Leyh jul...@vgai.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826563
--- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch ---
(In reply to comment #5)
2. added hicolor-icon-theme to build requirements
Your package requires 'hicolor-icon-theme' because of the directory ownership.
'hicolor-icon-theme' is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833511
--- Comment #5 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no ---
Would it be possible to run tests in a %check section?
What is the state of the tool?
I have done some initial testing on a F17 system and found some bugs.
a)
# dnf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820344
--- Comment #3 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825825
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820344
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-javaflow/1/apache-commons-javaflow.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834747
--- Comment #1 from Julian Leyh jul...@vgai.de ---
Sorry, forgot to re-upload the files after realizing that I had forgotten a
dependency..
Please download again if you downloaded it before this message was sent.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825825
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i |
|t)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785606
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Almost ready for official review. Please change
Requires:php-pear(pear.horde.org/Horde_Cli)
Requires:php-pear(pear.horde.org/Horde_Log)
to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785606
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785496
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Ready for official review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785495
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Ready for official review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785494
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785496
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785495
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785494
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Also, please add:
Requires: php-common = 5.2.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785493
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785492
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785491
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785489
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785489
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Also, please remove rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT from the %install section (see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag) -- I'm
assuming no EPEL 5 build because your
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785488
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823056
--- Comment #9 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Updates per comment #5:
- Fix package.xml for *.res files issue
- Added %lang directive flags for *.res files
- Modified %files because of separate *.res file listings
SPEC URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826563
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #6)
But then, when I try to install the packages built from the so-edited Spec
file, Yum complains about them requiring egtk = 3.1-3.fc17 and doesn't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834802
Bug ID: 834802
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834802
Mike Manilone crtm...@gmx.us changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854
--- Comment #25 from Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #24)
Doesn't that mean that it's possible to release it under GPLv3 at our option?
Yes, there is no licensing conflict as GPLv2+ software is a superclass of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||432228
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833462
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
Although the section at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
focuses on explicit library package deps, its bottom is meant to be understood
like
In the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825333
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825333
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
Or did you peek at the source tarball instead of the libopkele-devel rpm?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825333
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
For both Rawhide and F17, the two mentioned headers are not installed, so
bottom of comment 2 is true:
checking expat.h usability... yes
checking expat.h presence... yes
checking for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798977
--- Comment #1 from Hubert Schlussarz Ślósarski hub...@slosarski.pl ---
(In reply to comment #0)
SRPM URL: http://db.tt/NCjlvKZT
SRPM URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/j9rgjrehanfh522/gemrb-0.7.0-2.fc16.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819480
--- Comment #19 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Per our conversation on IRC after running rpmlint you got the following error:
limesurvey.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819480
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |dan.mas...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819480
--- Comment #20 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
After further investigation RC4 has been released.
This brings me to my first point:
1) If you are going to become the package maintainer for something you MUST
KEEP UP WITH UPSTREAM! If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819480
--- Comment #21 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
[dan@Fedora17 SPECS]$ rpmlint limesurvey.spec
limesurvey.spec:38: W: macro-in-comment %{SOURCE1}
limesurvey.spec:38: W: macro-in-comment %{_sysconfdir}
limesurvey.spec:57: W:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819480
--- Comment #22 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
@Kevin,
Any elder wisdom you could provide would help here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819480
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
42 matches
Mail list logo
