https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294
--- Comment #8 from Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/picolisp/picolisp.spec
SRPM URL:
http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/picolisp/picolisp-3.1.0-1.fc16.src.rpm
I did a scratch build for 3.1.0.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785442
--- Comment #6 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Please also update to 1.0.11
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783294
--- Comment #9 from Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/picolisp/picolisp.spec
SRPM URL:
http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/picolisp/picolisp-3.1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
Now it seems ok
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785471
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785471
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836708
Bug ID: 836708
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810928
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827761
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832810
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822472
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824838
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833154
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822472
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
erlang-merge_index-1.1.0-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828223
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822491
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832439
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832446
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821356
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827761
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
vdr-skinenigmang-0.1.2-5.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810928
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
sticky-notes-0.3.09062012.4-5.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828732
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822491
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
erlang-sext-0.4.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803089
--- Comment #22 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com ---
No, that's not normal. All I can think is that I must have
done a 'make dist' twice and included another copy of the
tarball.
Here is a corrected SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734248
--- Comment #4 from Reiner Rottmann rei...@rottmann.it ---
Thank you for having a look at the spec file and your greatly appreciated help.
I'm still interested in having the package included in Fedora. I want to learn
about the overall process
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834069
--- Comment #16 from Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com ---
I have improved the package(s) a bit more.
The changes are:
- Packaging less pre-compiled files (only the really needed pre-compiled files
like _startup* and _system are still
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835099
--- Comment #15 from Simon A. Erat erat.si...@gmail.com ---
True that @ Jason.
Changed my review script to use koji instead, which saves also the hazzle to
localy install the required packages to build.
But imho also takes the ability to verify
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810859
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org ---
Thanks for the review!
(In reply to comment #5)
Issues:
[!]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
Note: Patch0: python-dateutil-1.5-system-zoneinfo.patch (python-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803089
--- Comment #23 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
It doesn't seems to build in mock ( who has been running since 2/3h ).
It seems to block at :
/bin/bash - ./test_run.sh ./t100_counter.ml
Is this expected ( ie, it take a long time, I am
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834551
Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854
Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823661
Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834239
--- Comment #12 from Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com ---
SPEC:http://jvlomax.fedorapeople.org/packeging/monobristol.spec
SRPMS:
http://jvlomax.fedorapeople.org/packeging/monobristol-0.60.3-6.fc17.src.rpm
Same rpmlint output as above, minus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836014
--- Comment #8 from Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se ---
This package looks OK to me, so I pass the ball to Peter.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803089
--- Comment #24 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com ---
Are you using 32 bit? This patch was required for 32 bit
ARM:
commit d6da1b74e241e79eb0af9c01e390e98ceead3a49
Author: Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
Date: Sat Apr 28 20:40:39
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803089
--- Comment #25 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/whenjobs/whenjobs.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/whenjobs/whenjobs-0.7.3-1.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803089
--- Comment #26 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com ---
Koji scratch build which I guess proves that it builds on
32 bit ...
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4209135
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734248
--- Comment #5 from Reiner Rottmann rei...@rottmann.it ---
I've updated the apf.spec file and created new rpm packages.
Spec URL:
http://www.rottmann.it/apf/review/apf.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.rottmann.it/apf/review/apf-1.15-1.fc17.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810859
Robin Lee robinlee.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803089
--- Comment #27 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
Yup, this laptop is 32 bits. Let me start again mock and go on with the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188
Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch ---
Some additional comments to those from Cédric.
- The latest release is 4.12.3
- Isn't openssl and gpgme picked automatically by rpm? Already mentioned in
Comment 5 of 624023
- man
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825414
Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|NotReady|
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823066
--- Comment #14 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com ---
Updates per comment #12
- Removed APC require
- Updated %description
SPEC URL:
http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/php-symfony2-Validator.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823075
Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
By the way, if I were to submit this, the spec would look something like the
following, which is about as simple as a spec can get for a package with
translations:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810859
Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #6 from John Zaitseff j.zaits...@zap.org.au ---
Thank you, Jason, for your detailed comments: I do appreciate them!
Unfortunately, you've caught me at a bad time: I will be overseas and out of
e-mail/web contact for almost seven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835432
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819953
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815098
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811849
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825825
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829708
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812758
--- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
It's no problem. I'll be out of the country in a couple of weeks as well.
This ticket isn't going anywhere.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830709
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808258
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832443
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836749
Bug ID: 836749
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836749
--- Comment #1 from Tim Sally tsa...@atomicpeace.com ---
Here are the rpmlint and koji results.
[tsally@goddard SPECS]$ rpmlint -i objconv.spec
../RPMS/x86_64/objconv-2.14-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/objconv-debuginfo-2.14-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823070
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-symfony2-BrowserKit-2.0.15-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800930
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830709
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
robert-hooke-1.2.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836756
Bug ID: 836756
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831705
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823051
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-symfony2-Finder-2.0.15-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823062
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-symfony2-Serializer-2.0.15-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6
stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823047
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-symfony2-DomCrawler-2.0.15-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6
stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823043
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-symfony2-Console-2.0.15-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830811
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-No-Worries-0.3-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823058
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-symfony2-Process-2.0.15-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739015
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
erlang-riak_sysmon-1.1.2-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823050
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-symfony2-EventDispatcher-2.0.15-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6
stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823063
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
php-symfony2-Templating-2.0.15-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6
stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830811
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-No-Worries-0.3-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831705
--- Comment #2 from Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com ---
Review checklist follows, there is only one small issue at the bottom to be
addressed.
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831705
--- Comment #3 from Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm
-q
--requires).
/usr/bin/jj is overlinked:
$ ldd -u -r /usr/bin/jj
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830777
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830777
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
clucy-0.3.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clucy-0.3.0-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830777
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
clucy-0.3.0-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clucy-0.3.0-2.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825414
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825414
Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||BuildFails
---
83 matches
Mail list logo