https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840878
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
--- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/avgtime/avgtime.spec
I didn't rebuild the SRPM because literally the only change
is cp - cp -a.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740160
--- Comment #20 from Craig Barnes cbgn...@gmail.com ---
I've just cleaned up the changes made in 2.1.3-4. I have no remaining doubts
about this spec now. The latest revision passes rpmlint with no warnings.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836940
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836940
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
sshj-0.8.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sshj-0.8.1-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840878
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841001
--- Comment #3 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Ready for review:
SPEC:
http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/libmatewnck.spec
SRPM:
http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/libmatewnck-1.4.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
Description:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840619
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||limburg...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784145
Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843029
Bug ID: 843029
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718430
Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744432
Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836403
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836403
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836403
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784145
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
...
Building on fedora-17 seems still to fail though. But if you are not
Works for me with mock fedora-17 on x86_64, it has failed on arm or x86 ?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784145
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
--- Comment #11 from Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: kde-plasma-akonadi-calendars
Short Description: Calendars plasmoid for Akonadi resources
Owners: jgrulich
Branches: f17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
--- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
- Probably just a typo: Your VR is 1.0.1-1, but you obsolete
django-authopenid 1.0.1-4. That should be 1.0.1-1, right?
Hey Bohuslav,
Not sure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842067
Richard Marko rma...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842481
--- Comment #1 from Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt ---
The lgpl text that was in this package, not from the tarball, has been removed.
Spec URL: http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/jhighlight/1.0-2/jhighlight.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841001
--- Comment #4 from raveit65 chat-to...@raveit.de ---
a few suggestions :)
1. You have double entries of BuildRequires !
2. A empty row before %changelog would be nice.
3. We need only this as BuildRequires
BuildRequires: glib2-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784145
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Niels, please take ownership of review BZs. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
--- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Yes, that thing on my page is not clear enough - the initial release of
python-django-authopenid package should have already been 4, because the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836403
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: (Rename |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842067
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746215
Bug 746215 depends on bug 809142, which changed state.
Bug 809142 Summary: mod_perl fails to rebuild in rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809142
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842013
--- Comment #4 from Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Build in mock fail :
Exécution_de(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.E1njxS
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd nfsometer-1.1
+ LANG=C
+ export
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784145
Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nde...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #4 from Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt ---
Bundled jars removed from the source zip in the srpm so that the terms of their
licenses are not violated
Spec URL:
http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/maven-indexer/4.1.2-2/maven-indexer.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
kde-plasma-akonadi-calendars-0.1.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-akonadi-calendars-0.1.1-1.fc17
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842296
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842067
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842067
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
will-crash-0.2-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/will-crash-0.2-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[!]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842481
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842197
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749673
Krzysztof Daniel kdan...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jerb...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
avgtime-0-0.1.git20120724.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/avgtime-0-0.1.git20120724.fc17
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
--- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com ---
FTBFS in Rawhide. Appears to be a D compiler problem:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8950/4328950/build.log
+ ldc2 avgtime.d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842778
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||843133
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824061
Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(liangsuilong@gmai |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824052
Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(liangsuilong@gmai |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821247
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821247
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
fcitx-table-other-0.1.0-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fcitx-table-other-0.1.0-1.fc16
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821247
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
fcitx-table-other-0.1.0-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fcitx-table-other-0.1.0-1.fc17
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824057
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824057
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
fcitx-hangul-0.1.1-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fcitx-hangul-0.1.1-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824057
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
fcitx-hangul-0.1.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fcitx-hangul-0.1.1-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843153
Bug ID: 843153
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842570
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767649
--- Comment #32 from Nelson Marques nmo.marq...@gmail.com ---
Dan,
I don't know what to do from here, and this what I did:
- on pkgdb retired the package;
- removed myself from all groups I was subscrived (packaging, CLA, etc);
- filed a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821224
Michel Alexandre Salim michel+...@sylvestre.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842570
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842570
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
hi
rpmlint maven-script-interpreter-1.0-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
maven-script-interpreter.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
beanshell - bean shell, bean-shell, beans hell
1 packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836403
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836403
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jbossxb-2.0.3-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jbossxb-2.0.3-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842570
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
*** APPROVED ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||awill...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841003
--- Comment #30 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: mate-corba
Short Description: CORBA Object Request Broker for MATE Desktop
Owners: vicodan rdieter
Branches: f16 f17
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #6 from Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt ---
(In reply to comment #5)
The LICENSE file must be included in the SRPM and installed as %doc.
This is required by the point 4. of the license.
It's already being installed as %doc, and by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841766
Bug 841766 depends on bug 652629, which changed state.
Bug 652629 Summary: Review Request: erlang-riak_kv - Riak Key/Value Store
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652629
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810010
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
genders-1.18-6.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810010
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
genders-1.18-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796953
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
--- Comment #4 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
Btw, could a tracker bug be added, so we can see the progression of unity
packaging ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842013
--- Comment #5 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
+ /usr/bin/python setup.py build
Error importing numpy - Make sure numpy is installed
seems numpy is missing :)
In fact to make it build, I have added the following ( setup.py check runtime
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842481
--- Comment #3 from Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt ---
Fixed! :)
Spec URL: http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/jhighlight/1.0-3/jhighlight.spec
SRPM URL:
http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/jhighlight/1.0-3/jhighlight-1.0-3.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
--- Comment #8 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Tested on Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4329789
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838756
Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722713
Mauricio Cleveland mauricio.clevel...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|16 |17
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842891
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842481
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842891
--- Comment #2 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
Also, can the unit test be run in %check ( and so that would require rcov at
built time) ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842891
--- Comment #3 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
And it need to have a systemd file, I could write one but I am not sure.
Stickshift-broker should be started separately, with a separate apache +
passenger ( + mod_ssl ) instance running on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
--- Comment #5 from Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com ---
sorry about that guys. added the one missing BR.
mock f17 run completes without error now for me
mock rawhide run completes without error now for me
ive pushed corrected spec and srpms to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756465
Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kwiz...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-django-authopenid-1.0.1-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-authopenid-1.0.1-4.fc16
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-django-authopenid-1.0.1-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-authopenid-1.0.1-4.fc17
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842891
--- Comment #4 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com ---
Thank you for being so thorough. It helps when I have so many of these that I
am working on.
ridealong - That should be having a review request in by the end of the week.
Ridealong also has
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509
--- Comment #6 from Jef Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Let me be clear, I'm not currently working towards packaging unity so I don't
see the point of a tracker bug.
My first goal is to get libunity packaged, as its
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828626
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
saslwrapper-0.16-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824057
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821247
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820729
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828626
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
saslwrapper-0.16-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo