https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848421
Damian Wrobel dwro...@ertelnet.rybnik.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848421
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848421
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
pgRouting-1.05-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pgRouting-1.05-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848421
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
pgRouting-1.05-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pgRouting-1.05-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848421
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
pgRouting-1.05-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pgRouting-1.05-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848664
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847953
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847953
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de ---
Maybe, it's time for an update? http://pypi.python.org/pypi/django-countries
(version 1.3 was released yesterday)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847953
--- Comment #6 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com ---
Thanks for the heads up. I'll update before importing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849545
Bug ID: 849545
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847697
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847697
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mate-backgrounds-1.4.0-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-backgrounds-1.4.0-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847697
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mate-backgrounds-1.4.0-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-backgrounds-1.4.0-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847697
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mate-backgrounds-1.4.0-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-backgrounds-1.4.0-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208
--- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
owncloud-csync-0.50.8-9.fc17,mirall-1.0.5-4.fc17 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 17.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
owncloud-csync-0.50.8-9.fc17,mirall-1.0.5-4.fc17 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 17.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848256
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848208
--- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
owncloud-csync-0.50.8-9.fc18,mirall-1.0.5-4.fc18 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 18.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848211
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
owncloud-csync-0.50.8-9.fc18,mirall-1.0.5-4.fc18 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 18.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810676
--- Comment #24 from Julian Leyh jul...@vgai.de ---
(In reply to comment #22)
AWS with gnutls doen't work for me. I have to investigate this (or maybe
link with OpenSSL?).
Official documentation only seems to mention OpenSSL, but the sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849579
Bug ID: 849579
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847755
Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847755
Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810676
--- Comment #25 from Julian Leyh jul...@vgai.de ---
License:GPLv2+
This is not true for 2.11.0 any more, it is GPLv3+ with GCC Runtime Library
Exception, version 3.1, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
So it should be (like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849455
--- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel+...@sylvestre.me ---
Updating Vala in Rawhide and F18, will test this once the Rawhide build lands
in the repos.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848353
--- Comment #4 from Pierre pierrejourda...@gmail.com ---
There is some problems :
patch1 name should prefixed with %{name}.
Buildroot is not needed for fedora packaging , you can remove this line .
%defattr (-,root,root,-) is useless
In mock
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848353
--- Comment #5 from Pierre pierrejourda...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 605647
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=605647action=edit
fedora-review results for python-pthreading
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848087
Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819951
Michel Alexandre Salim michel+...@sylvestre.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844152
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mate-file-manager-1.4.0-7.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mate-file-manager-1.4.0-7.fc18
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849026
--- Comment #6 from Jørn Lomax northlo...@gmail.com ---
I think you may need Requires: pulseaudio-utils and Requires:
jack-audio-connection-kit as there's no way for RPM to pick up those runtime
dependencies due to os calls. Goes for anything
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823962
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823962
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
apacheds-shared-0.9.19-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/apacheds-shared-0.9.19-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846744
Marcus Moeller marcus.moel...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823962
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
apacheds-shared-0.9.19-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/apacheds-shared-0.9.19-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849618
Bug ID: 849618
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844165
--- Comment #39 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
new starting point.
koji scratcch
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4405613
SPEC:
http://raveit65.fedorapeople.org/Mate-Desktop/fc18/SPECS/mate-window-manager.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830593
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830593
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-B-Generate-1.45-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-B-Generate-1.45-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830593
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-B-Generate-1.45-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-B-Generate-1.45-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830593
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-B-Generate-1.45-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-B-Generate-1.45-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839395
--- Comment #18 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Regarding %patch1, that was another mistake. I had incorrectly ported a
change that was recommended in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby.
There the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847953
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848087
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848664
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849381
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845107
--- Comment #14 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
What is the reason to not use the gem as a Source0 for the package? Why are you
using the tarball?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848256
Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848256
--- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-taskw
Short Description: Python bindings for your taskwarrior database
Owners: ralph
Branches: el6 f18 f17
InitialCC:
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848256
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839395
--- Comment #19 from Brenton Leanhardt blean...@redhat.com ---
I'm not sure I completely understand your stance on patch1. Are you saying
that no changes to the gemspec are needed? Currently the Gemfile pulls all gem
dependencies from the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840037
Brenton Leanhardt blean...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840037
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848087
Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847435
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847435
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-X11-Protocol-Other-18-1.fc16, shutter-0.89.1-2.fc16,
perl-Net-Dropbox-API-1.8-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847953
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847953
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-django-countries-1.3-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-countries-1.3-1.fc18
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848664
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848664
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-django-profile-0.6-0.1.20110216svnr458.fc18 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 18.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842633
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839395
--- Comment #20 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #19)
I'm not sure I completely understand your stance on patch1. Are you saying
that no changes to the gemspec are needed? Currently the Gemfile pulls all
gem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839395
--- Comment #21 from Brenton Leanhardt blean...@redhat.com ---
That makes sense. I really appreciate the explanation. I'll have a new
release of the SRPM/Spec shortly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846744
--- Comment #4 from Marcus Moeller marcus.moel...@gmx.ch ---
You may also want to encourage upstream to fix some licensing issues:
libmate-1.4.0/libmate/mate-help.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF
address)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839395
--- Comment #22 from Brenton Leanhardt blean...@redhat.com ---
* Mon Aug 20 2012 Brenton Leanhardt blean...@redhat.com - 0.14.15-8
- Properly recreate the gemspec with 'gem spec'
- Dropped upstreamed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847755
Brian Pepple bdpep...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819338
--- Comment #8 from Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: linux-user-chroot
Short Description: Helper program for calling chroot(2) as non-root
Owners: walters
Branches: f17 f18 el6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848551
--- Comment #3 from Kai Engert (:kaie) keng...@redhat.com ---
You have to replace all occurences of pygobject2 with pygobject3 in
BuildRequires and Requires.
done
Moreover, you can drop the following from BuildRequires:
gettext: needed by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847755
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846744
--- Comment #5 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de ---
(In reply to comment #4)
You may also want to encourage upstream to fix some licensing issues:
libmate-1.4.0/libmate/mate-help.c: LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF
address)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830784
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(m...@zarb.org)|
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845107
--- Comment #15 from Adam Miller admil...@redhat.com ---
I've always had the impression of Must Build From Source when it comes to
Fedora packages and have generally defaulted to the tarballs from upstream
projects, I'm still rather new to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830784
--- Comment #8 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
I cannot build it on f18 , no maven-artifact in mock.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849709
Bug ID: 849709
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819338
Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832953
Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||prais...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847604
Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||844151
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844151
Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||847604
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819338
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841243
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841713
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847755
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847755
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gstreamer1-0.11.93-1.fc18, gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-0.11.93-2.fc18,
gstreamer1-plugins-base-0.11.93-1.fc18, gstreamer1-plugins-good-0.11.93-1.fc18
has been submitted as an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848551
--- Comment #4 from Kai Engert (:kaie) keng...@redhat.com ---
There are a lot of entries in Requires. You should build your package
without them and check what is picked up automatically. Then add those which
are not found by rpm.
I did that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848551
--- Comment #5 from Kai Engert (:kaie) keng...@redhat.com ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://kuix.de/fedora/ppm/prepaid-manager-applet.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kuix.de/fedora/ppm/prepaid-manager-applet-0.0.3.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848551
--- Comment #6 from Kai Engert (:kaie) keng...@redhat.com ---
f17 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4406920
f18 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4406936
both completed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848551
Kai Engert (:kaie) keng...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|9 |17
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819951
Bug 819951 depends on bug 819338, which changed state.
Bug 819338 Summary: Review Request: linux-user-chroot - Helper program for
calling chroot(2) as non-root
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819338
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819338
Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847160
--- Comment #5 from Roland Grunberg rgrun...@redhat.com ---
I've tried using eclipse-m2e-core on an f18 machine, but faced some issues :
- slf4j.api needs org.slf4j.impl;version=1.6.0, which wasn't being found, so
I symlinked it into the dropins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848551
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849382
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849709
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||849709
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844015
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||849709
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844151
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||849709
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847604
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||849709
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844165
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||849709
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844150
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||849709
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847712
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||849709
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
