https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853124
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Runge ---
Andrew,
I would do this review also.
Matthias
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865241
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787350
--- Comment #10 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda ---
As Vit points out, the specs are runnable with the puppetlabs_spec_helper Gem,
so I would advise to first package that one. As mentioned in Comment 6, it is
also needed to do "require 'rspec-puppe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787350
--- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch ---
Please note that I did not need to create the site.pp file or anything else.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787350
--- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch ---
The test suite pases for me:
$ rspec
/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in `require': iconv will be
deprecated in the future, use String#encode instead.
Mocha deprecation warning: Test::Unit or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #10 from Vít Ondruch ---
Thank you Maros. However, did you have a chance to investigate the Markdown
error and report it upstream? Would be nice to know what is the cause of the
error. That is the purpose of the test suite.
BTW You h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864941
--- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon ---
These are details which are not blocking for the review, I will change them at
import or all in one go if there are other changes to make.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865241
David Tardon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dtar...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Da
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865241
Bug ID: 865241
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865240
Bug ID: 865240
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863983
Eduardo Echeverria changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863983
--- Comment #9 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Koji Build Rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4580364
Koji Build F18
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4580373
Koji Build F17
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845540
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
xapool-1.5.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845540
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815060
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
classmate-0.5.4-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815060
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856002
--- Comment #6 from Ian Malone ---
Thanks very much for picking this one up! Just one note about the udev/plughw
group rule, I went through some discussion about this a while back with the
devel list and the correct fedora way is with a dynamic a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864941
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852898
--- Comment #11 from Gerd v. Egidy ---
Hi Ralf,
(In reply to comment #9)
> Did you check this package works on all Fedora architectures?
>
> Last time I checked, running testsuite on different architectures exposed
> arch-dependent bugs of this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860424
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768894
Davide Benini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dben...@gmail.com
--- Comment #14 from D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858287
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852211
--- Comment #21 from Lukas Zapletal ---
Created subpackage - small static library for INI parsing. Going to incorporate
the changes with upstream:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865116
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865116
Bug ID: 865116
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864937
Ralph Bean changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
--- Comment #26 from Remi Collet ---
Seamonkey extension directory is not owned.
Bug reported, see #865054
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|thunder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864464
--- Comment #11 from Lorenzo Gil Sanchez ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Lorenzo,
>
> BuildRequires means to build the RPM, as opposed to Requires, which is just
> for run time. Even the tox testsuite stage is considered part of the
> rpmbuild,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863768
--- Comment #8 from Dan Mashal ---
Holding off on this. Might use lightdm or mdm instead.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862216
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
libdivecomputer-0.2.0-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862216
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864464
--- Comment #10 from Adam Young ---
Lorenzo,
BuildRequires means to build the RPM, as opposed to Requires, which is just for
run time. Even the tox testsuite stage is considered part of the rpmbuild, and
thus external packages like pypy and such
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861548
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
znerd-oss-parent-3-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861548
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864432
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
owasp-esapi-java-2.0.1-3.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864432
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864535
Darryl L. Pierce changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(mprivozn@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
--- Comment #24 from Remi Collet ---
WIP: https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/tree/master/mozilla-enigmail
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817779
--- Comment #23 from Russell Golden ---
1.4.5 works with SeaMonkey 2.13. It was released today. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845540
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
xapool-1.5.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xapool-1.5.0-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845540
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
xapool-1.5.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xapool-1.5.0-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845540
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845540
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815060
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
classmate-0.5.4-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/classmate-0.5.4-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815060
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
classmate-0.5.4-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/classmate-0.5.4-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815060
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864090
--- Comment #4 from Luke Macken ---
Fixed the URL
Spec URL:
http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gnome-shell-extension-fedmsg.spec
SRPM URL:
http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gnome-shell-extension-fedmsg-0.1.0-2.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845540
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845540
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #5 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864464
--- Comment #9 from Lorenzo Gil Sanchez ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Update:
> - enabled tests also
> SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-tox.spec
> SRPM: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-tox-1.4.2-2.fc17.src.rpm
Your ne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845540
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845540
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/xapool/1/xapool.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/xapool/1/xapool-1.5.0-2.fc16.src.rpm
- fix license tag
- repackaged Source0 and removed all binary files
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864090
--- Comment #3 from Luke Macken ---
Updated with GPLv3 LICENSE file.
Spec URL:
http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gnome-shell-extension-fedmsg.spec
SRPM URL:
http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gnome-shell-extension-fedmsg-0.1.0-1.fc17.src.rp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864481
Massimo Paladin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||massimo.pala...@gmail.com
As
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787350
--- Comment #7 from Greg Swift ---
So from the original spec file:
%check
# disabled because this segfault in mock
# requires to have a working setup of puppet
# see
# https://github.com/rodjek/rspec-puppet/issues/15
# https://projects.puppetla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839650
Mo Morsi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproj
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859271
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859271
--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet ---
Created attachment 624962
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=624962&action=edit
859271-php-symfony2-OptionsResolver/php-symfony2-OptionsResolver-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.3.0 (c7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845540
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815060
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815060
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859270
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859270
--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet ---
Created attachment 624957
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=624957&action=edit
859270-php-symfony2-Filesystem/php-symfony2-Filesystem-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.3.0 (c78e275) las
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839653
--- Comment #9 from Maros Zatko ---
Now runs tests. Rebuilt against F17 and Rawhide in mock.
Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/rubygem-slim.spec
SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~hexo/rpm/rubygem-slim-1.2.2-4.fc17.src.rpm
Description: Slim is a template la
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859914
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Complete.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852214
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Complete.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856722
Pádraig Brady changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815060
Marek Goldmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859914
Paul Flo Williams changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@frixxon.co.uk
Flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=852214
Paul Flo Williams changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@frixxon.co.uk
Flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839652
Mo Morsi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproj
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858381
--- Comment #16 from gil cattaneo ---
hi Clément,
please update the source rpm.
there are still the same problems discussed above
thanks regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855780
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon/1/apacheds-daemon.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apacheds-daemon/1/apacheds-daemon-1.1.8-2.fc16.src.rpm
- fix build problems x86_64 arch
test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857487
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Complete, sorry for not reading the whole request.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857487
Paul Flo Williams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Paul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859586
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
gsm-ussd-0.4.0-0.4.25.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gsm-ussd-0.4.0-0.4.25.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861548
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
znerd-oss-parent-3-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/znerd-oss-parent-3-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787350
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from Ví
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862216
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
libdivecomputer-0.2.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libdivecomputer-0.2.0-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862216
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
libdivecomputer-0.2.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libdivecomputer-0.2.0-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862216
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864941
Bug ID: 864941
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861548
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
fasterxml-oss-parent-3-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fasterxml-oss-parent-3-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861548
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861548
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |
Flags|fedora-cvs+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861548
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857487
--- Comment #6 from Paul Flo Williams ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Misformatted request.
Could you please expand on that? I'm attempting to follow the template shown
here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests
Except that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861548
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||limburg...@gmail.com
Flags|fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861548
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857487
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Misformatted request.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864937
Bug ID: 864937
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863983
--- Comment #8 from Nikos Roussos ---
Nice tip! Thanks
updated files:
spec: http://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/ninja-ide.spec
SRPM: http://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/ninja-ide-2.1.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861548
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Blocks|652183 (FE-JA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861548
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
strange ... i checked it and the 2 spec file are different
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861548
--- Comment #4 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
That spec files are identical.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861548
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/znerd-oss-parent/3/znerd-oss-parent.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/znerd-oss-parent/3/znerd-oss-parent-3-2.fc16.src.rpm
- remove improper requires
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864432
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
owasp-esapi-java-2.0.1-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/owasp-esapi-java-2.0.1-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864432
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
owasp-esapi-java-2.0.1-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/owasp-esapi-java-2.0.1-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864432
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
