https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870323
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870323
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
glogg-0.8.3-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821233
--- Comment #14 from Sourav Basu ---
I built it using koji first then used the prebuilt binaries to review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-revi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857705
--- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Do we need to have the devel package require pkgconfig for
> %{_libdir}/pkgconfig?
Dependency on /usr/bin/pkg-config is automatically added if a package shipped
*.pc files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871511
--- Comment #6 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
For now, I'll do an informal review, and I repeat, if you want build in the
devel branch, I'll take the review
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864315
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864315
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
lonote-1.8.7-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lonote-1.8.7-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872020
Bug ID: 872020
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737401
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871605
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871604
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870719
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868939
--- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866118
--- Comment #5 from Joseph Marrero ---
Spec URL:
http://marreroj.com/fedora/review-packages/php-sabredav-Sabre_HTTP.spec
SRPM URL:
http://marreroj.com/fedora/review-packages/php-sabredav-Sabre_HTTP-1.6.4-3.fc18.src.rpm
old packages here:
http://
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862502
--- Comment #9 from Joseph Marrero ---
Spec URL: http://marreroj.com/fedora/review-packages/php-sabredav-Sabre.spec
SRPM URL:
http://marreroj.com/fedora/review-packages/php-sabredav-Sabre-1.0.0-6.fc18.src.rpm
old packages here:
http://marreroj.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862501
--- Comment #5 from Joseph Marrero ---
Spec URL:
http://marreroj.com/fedora/review-packages/php-sabredav-Sabre_DAV.spec
SRPM URL:
http://marreroj.com/fedora/review-packages/php-sabredav-Sabre_DAV-1.6.5-1.fc18.src.rpm
old packages here:
http://ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869120
--- Comment #2 from Joseph Marrero ---
Spec URL:
http://marreroj.com/fedora/review-packages/php-sabredav-Sabre_DAVACL.spec
SRPM URL:
http://marreroj.com/fedora/review-packages/php-sabredav-Sabre_DAVACL-1.6.0-3.fc18.src.rpm
old files here: http:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869121
--- Comment #2 from Joseph Marrero ---
Spec URL:
http://marreroj.com/fedora/review-packages/php-sabredav-Sabre_CalDAV.spec
SRPM URL:
http://marreroj.com/fedora/review-packages/php-sabredav-Sabre_CalDAV-1.6.4-3.fc18.src.rpm
Old files here: ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869123
--- Comment #2 from Joseph Marrero ---
Spec URL:
http://marreroj.com/fedora/review-packages/php-sabredav-Sabre_CardDAV.spec
SRPM URL:
http://marreroj.com/fedora/review-packages/php-sabredav-Sabre_CardDAV-1.6.5-2.fc18.src.rpm
old files here: http:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869119
--- Comment #2 from Joseph Marrero ---
Spec URL:
http://marreroj.com/fedora/review-packages/php-sabredav-Sabre_VObject.spec
SRPM URL:
http://marreroj.com/fedora/review-packages/php-sabredav-Sabre_VObject-1.3.5-2.fc18.src.rpm
old file here: http:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868717
--- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich ---
After reading through the license header again, Kevin Kofler explained to me,
that the license must be "LGPLv2 or LGPLv3" and to "add a comment saying that
newer versions approved by KDE e.V. are allowed".
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737401
--- Comment #24 from Volker Fröhlich ---
http://www.geofrogger.net/review/saga.spec
http://www.geofrogger.net/review/saga-2.0.8-5.fc16.src.rpm
1 through 5 addressed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868717
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org
--- Comment #4 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868939
Marcel Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870725
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Fabian
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871216
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||volke...@gmx.at
--- Comment #3 from Vo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870323
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870323
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
glogg-0.8.3-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glogg-0.8.3-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870323
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
glogg-0.8.3-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glogg-0.8.3-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833226
Jos de Kloe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedorap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870719
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Fabian
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818458
--- Comment #12 from Toby Ovod-Everett ---
Sorry for the delay in testing. I just installed rubygem-ruby-debug19 from the
testing repository along with all the dependencies (it picked up
rubygem-ruby-debug-base19 from testing, rubygem-linecache1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859675
--- Comment #22 from Erwin Waterlander ---
The past weeks I have worked on a new version of wcd. I released it on Monday
Oct 29. I added support for a $(sysconfdir) variable in the Makefile. So now
the installation uses %{_syscondir} from the spe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871605
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871604
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870719
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review, Mario.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870860
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/opencsg.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/opencsg-1.3.2-5.fc17.src.rpm
- Nothing has changed, I've just moved SRPM and SPEC to a n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859795
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
sha-1.0.4b-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
xword-1.0-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863793
--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok ---
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/skeinforge.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/skeinforge-12.03.14-8.fc17.src.rpm
- Nothing has changed, I've just moved SRPM to a n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863796
--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok ---
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/printrun.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/printrun-0.0-10.20120924gitb6935b93.fc17.src.rpm
- Nothing has changed, I've just moved
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864187
--- Comment #9 from Miro Hrončok ---
Spec URL: https://raw.github.com/hroncok/SPECS/master/openscad.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/downloads/hroncok/SPECS/openscad-2012.10.31-1.fc17.src.rpm
- New version
- Solved 2 MLCAD files license issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868940
--- Comment #4 from Marcel Wysocki ---
Update:
Spec URL: http://maci.satgnu.net/rpmbuild/SPECS/s3ql.spec
SRPM URL: http://maci.satgnu.net/rpmbuild/SRPMS/s3ql-1.12-3.fc17.src.rpm
Koji URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=464393
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870522
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Thanks for the comments, Ivan.
(In reply to comment #1)
> Drop BR ocaml (ocaml-ocamldoc will pull it when building)
It is redundant, true, but I prefer to keep that particular BR since this is an
ocaml packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871511
--- Comment #5 from Juan Orti Alcaine ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> No needed the macro %{?_isa} in subpackage frontend.
I think it's better to fully specify the required version, as stated in the
guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871909
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||871893, 866756
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871909
Bug ID: 871909
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871906
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||866756
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871906
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||871893
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871906
Bug ID: 871906
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868939
--- Comment #15 from Marcel Wysocki ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-llfuse
Short Description: Python Bindings for the low-level FUSE API
Owners: maci
Branches: f17 f18 el6
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871898
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||871893
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868939
--- Comment #14 from Marcel Wysocki ---
thanks, ill put python3 builds on my todo list. gotta read the wiki pages first
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871898
Bug ID: 871898
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
package-review@lists.fedorapro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871339
Siddharth Sharma changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sisha...@redhat.com
Block
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846008
--- Comment #12 from Christophe Burgun ---
Yes this package is functional even without a D compiler
once compiled this library is functional
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828188
--- Comment #15 from Sebastien Caps ---
Based on new comments from Greg Swift I fix %ifs block.
SPEC:
http://repo.virer.net/PackagesReviews/2012103102/reprepro.spec
SRPM:
http://repo.virer.net/PackagesReviews/2012103102/reprepro-4.12.3-6.fc16.sr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870978
--- Comment #2 from Frantisek Kluknavsky ---
Upstream versioning scheme is uncommon but acceptable:
- observing past releases, we can expect linearity in the future.
- the '+' character can be considered as a part of version tag, not as a
(fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870522
Ivan Romanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dr...@land.ru
--- Comment #1 from Ivan Ro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871203
--- Comment #2 from Ivan Romanov ---
I wonder. What for is need this file? If it is cmake module it should be places
in /usr/share/cmake/Modules
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871203
Ivan Romanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dr...@land.ru
--- Comment #1 from Ivan Ro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868931
--- Comment #8 from Marcel Wysocki ---
fixed manpage generation
minor cleanups
Spec URL: http://maci.satgnu.net/rpmbuild/SPECS/sshuttle.spec
SRPM URL:
http://maci.satgnu.net/rpmbuild/SRPMS/sshuttle-20121019-4.gitg9ce2fa0.fc17.src.rpm
Koji URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867396
Maxim Burgerhout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867396
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867396
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
yubikey-personalization-gui-3.1.1-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yubikey-personalization-gui-3.1.1-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867396
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
yubikey-personalization-gui-3.1.1-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yubikey-personalization-gui-3.1.1-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863445
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871092
--- Comment #10 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to comment #9)
>
> %lang(ca) %{_datadir}/locale-langpack/ca/LC_MESSAGES/%{name}.mo
> %lang(cs) %{_datadir}/locale-langpack/cs/LC_MESSAGES/%{name}.mo
> %lang(de) %{_datadir}/locale-langpack/de/LC_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846008
--- Comment #11 from Pierre-YvesChibon ---
So this package is functional even without a D compiler?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review maili
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806117
--- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann ---
Ping...?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
ht
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868939
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863983
Nikos Roussos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819951
Colin Walters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(walt...@redhat.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871339
Siddharth Sharma changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sisha...@redhat.com
Block
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868939
--- Comment #12 from Marcel Wysocki ---
fixed
Update:
Spec URL: http://maci.satgnu.net/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-llfuse.spec
SRPM URL:
http://maci.satgnu.net/rpmbuild/SRPMS/python-llfuse-0.37.1-9.fc17.src.rpm
Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871191
Stanislav Ochotnicky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871092
--- Comment #9 from Mario Blättermann ---
Some (or maybe all?) source file headers contain the "newer versions" clause
regarding the license, that's why the license is GPLv3+.
BuildRequires: pkgconfig(python2)
is a recursive requirement of pyca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871339
Neal Becker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ndbeck...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Ne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866901
--- Comment #13 from Florencia Fotorello ---
Hello,
Some informal comments:
1) You can use %{name}.desktop instead of gogui.desktop.
2) Regarding rpmlint output, just some comments, no action needed:
--
gogui.noarch: I: enchant-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468466
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|Reopened|
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868939
--- Comment #11 from Mario Blättermann ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4642480
$ rpmlint -i -v *
python-llfuse.src: I: checking
python-llfuse.src: I: checking-url http://code.google.com/p/python-llfuse/
(tim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
xword-1.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xword-1.0-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
xword-1.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xword-1.0-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871092
--- Comment #8 from Benedikt Schäfer ---
Package Review
==
Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[!]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870978
Frantisek Kluknavsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871092
--- Comment #7 from Benedikt Schäfer ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hi Antonio,
> You have to write the BuildRequires like that:
> BuildRequires: pkgconfig, gettext, ..., ..., ...
>
> also the
>
> Requires: pycairo, ..., ...
>
> Note: I am n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870978
Frantisek Kluknavsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fkluk...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866901
--- Comment #12 from Christophe Burgun ---
- The /usr/share has been changed with the macro %{_datadir}
- The sed has been push in %prep section
- The installation for thumbnailer is now with install command
New links :
SPEC : http://jouty.fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868939
--- Comment #10 from Marcel Wysocki ---
fixed
Update:
Spec URL: http://maci.satgnu.net/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-llfuse.spec
SRPM URL:
http://maci.satgnu.net/rpmbuild/SRPMS/python-llfuse-0.37.1-8.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870323
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867396
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864315
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865303
--- Comment #15 from Brendan Jones ---
Thanks Ralf, all done.
SRPM:
http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/realTimeConfigQuickScan-0-0.7.20120506hg.fc18.src.rpm
SPEC: http://bsjones.fedorapeople.org/realTimeConfigQuickScan.spec
Should I also be using
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832831
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=865303
--- Comment #14 from Ralf Corsepius ---
Created attachment 636014
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=636014&action=edit
reworked *.spec
This a proposal to address the issues mentioned in comment #13.
--
You are receiving this
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo