https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989859
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Volker Fröhlich from comment #3)
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses --
> The license should read "BSD" in the spec file.
Fixed.
> The example progra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807821
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng ---
I may have a try, but can you provide your spec/SRPM?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8vt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989015
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
Your SRPM name doesn't match the spec name, m-akeself? makeself?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989859
--- Comment #3 from Volker Fröhlich ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses -- The
license should read "BSD" in the spec file.
The example program is not part of the main package. Thus I feel, the main
pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986991
--- Comment #2 from Axilleas Pipinellis ---
Ok, some remarks.
First of all, I would like to see `%build` above `gem build
%{gem_name}.gemspec`. I know it doesn't mean much for gems, but I like the
consistency :)
Second, I couldn't get it to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821406
--- Comment #11 from Veaceslav Mindru ---
Hello Vasiliy, i did not have time to build it so far.I will try today and will
let you know.
VM
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989015
--- Comment #4 from Dridi Boukelmoune ---
I thought it wouldn't matter for a package that hasn't been published yet.
Spec URL: https://bitbucket.org/dridi/fedora_packages/downloads/makeself.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bitbucket.org/dridi/fedora_pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915920
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
OK.
Then could you please provide the latest version of SPEC/SPRM?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989015
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
Oh...
You forgot to bump the release number, each time you've fixed some problems you
should bump it from n to n+1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821406
--- Comment #10 from Vasiliy Glazov ---
Veaceslav, problem still present? show full build log.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZGVn
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989015
--- Comment #2 from Dridi Boukelmoune ---
> 1. When will you stop replacing the copying file? That means, when will
> upstream fix the license issue?
Already done in the master branch:
https://github.com/megastep/makeself/issues/22
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng ---
1. If I don't mark it as %config I'm afraid rpmlint will shout. But it's right
to not mark them as they are not conf files. I remember someone has marked it
as %config, or maybe I forget, whatever.
2. F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng ---
1. If I don't mark it as %config I'm afraid rpmlint will shout. But it's right
to not mark them as they are not conf files. I remember someone has marked it
as %config, or maybe I forget, whatever.
2. F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969220
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927374
--- Comment #9 from Axilleas Pipinellis ---
Hi, thanks for the update, I will look into the failing tests. It seems that
you forgot to update the spec file though ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989297
--- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: fdm
Short Description: A simple lightweight tool of fetching, filtering and
delivering emails
Owners: cicku
Branches: f18 f19
InitialCC:
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989297
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9 from Chr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng ---
1. Well, not all times I can replace the COPYING, especially I cannot get
permission of upstream.
But such error is not blocker.
Changed to GPLv2+.
2. I will suggest RPM adding iconsdir macro into mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989297
HAYASHI Kentaro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989015
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989859
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: libxls - A |Review Request: libxls - A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979666
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng ---
When ready please leave a comment.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ojHQwSPioV&a=
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989859
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Volker Fröhlich from comment #1)
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
> Guidelines#Trademarks_in_Summary_or_Description
Aha thanks.
Will you do a full review?
SPEC/SRPM links are th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824218
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
Summary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989800
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Dan Mashal from comment #4)
> (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> > Where is the changelog?
>
> Changelog for what?
For what? You dont know for what?
You don't know how to wr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989297
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng ---
OK.
I'll change license to ISC for -3.
Kick that bullshit of speeling-error ;)
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/fdm.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/fdm-1.7-3.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989297
--- Comment #6 from HAYASHI Kentaro ---
(In reply to HAYASHI Kentaro from comment #5)
> It seems fdm does not contain separate license text files, but Licencse: in
> spec describes GPLv3, on the otherhand, web site indicates
> (http://sourcefor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989800
--- Comment #4 from Dan Mashal ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> Where is the changelog?
Changelog for what?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866312
tingp...@tingping.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tingping@tingping |
|.se)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824218
Adrian Alves changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(aal...@gmail.com) |
|needinfo?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875668
--- Comment #3 from Gerard Ryan ---
Not sure if it's an oversight or if there's some other reason for it, but
fedora-review flag is not set. I'm happy to approve this, as all looks good;
but please set fedora-review to ? first to indicate that yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875668
Gerard Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ger...@ryan.lt
--- Comment #2 from Gerard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927374
--- Comment #8 from Troy Dawson ---
Spec URL: http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/review/rubygem-rugged.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/review/rubygem-rugged-0.19.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
- I have updated to 0.19.0
-- Since we are building wi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989266
--- Comment #2 from Gerard Ryan ---
Spec URL: http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/smooks/1.5.1-2/smooks.spec
SRPM URL:
http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/smooks/1.5.1-2/smooks-1.5.1-2.fc20.src.rpm
Sorry about that! I don;t know how those BR's slipped t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984605
--- Comment #6 from marcindulak ---
This fixes bug #984605 comment #2 and hopefully conforms to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MPI#Packaging_of_MPI_software
It builds the serial, openmpi and mpich versions. The basis sets,
pseudopotentia
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984605
--- Comment #7 from Susi Lehtola ---
By the way,
%ifarch i386 i586 i686
should read
%ifarch %ix86
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=u
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990279
Steven Dake changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990279
Steven Dake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sd...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736717
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(bugs.michael@gmx. |
|net)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
--- Comment #2 from Dridi Boukelmoune ---
To build successfully with mock:
BuildRequires: jpackage-utils
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984846
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990278
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990278
Bug ID: 990278
Summary: Review Request: krfb - Desktop Sharing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assigne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990279
Bug ID: 990279
Summary: Review Request: diskimage-builder - Image building
tools for OpenStack
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990277
Bug ID: 990277
Summary: Review Request: krdc - Remote Desktop Client
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990277
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990276
Bug ID: 990276
Summary: Review Request: kppp - Dialer and Front end for pppd
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990275
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990275
Bug ID: 990275
Summary: Review Request: kopete - Instant Messenger
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Ass
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989752
--- Comment #19 from Michael Schwendt ---
Hmm, then it'll be the package maintainer's job to ensure that those sonames
match what's provided in the package collection and that they don't change
during a release. Probably not a problem with X11, b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990272
Bug ID: 990272
Summary: Review Request: libmbim - library to control
MBIM-speaking WWAN modems
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824218
--- Comment #14 from Matthias Runge ---
Conscious User: Thank you for popping up. Currently, it looks like the
submitter was not able to submit a buildable package.
Best thing would be to wait for Adrian to explain, how he'd like to proceed
here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984846
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CwLUQT3Cf2&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984846
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989266
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
hi
build fails
[INFO] Building Milyn Commons 1.5.1
[INFO]
[WARNING] The POM for org.freemarker:freemarker:jar:2.3.15 is missing, no
depe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990269
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990269
Bug ID: 990269
Summary: Review Request: kget - Download manager
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assign
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990268
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990268
Bug ID: 990268
Summary: Review Request: kdnssd - KDE Network Monitor for
DNS-SD services (Zeroconf)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Seve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990266
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews)
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990266
Bug ID: 990266
Summary: Review Request: kdenetwork-filesharing - Network
filesharing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989266
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|nob
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989960
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
qtdbf-0.9.9-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qtdbf-0.9.9-3.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969220
--- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #2)
> 1. Are you going to check out from git or use stable version?
Stable.
> 2. rpmlint(filtered):
>
> x2goserver.i686: E: zero-length /etc/X11/Xsession.option
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980937
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|abi-dumper-0.98-1.fc19 |abi-dumper-0.98-1.fc18
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969830
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|nodejs-grip-0.1.5-2.fc18|nodejs-grip-0.1.5-2.fc19
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979660
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987717
Bug 987717 depends on bug 979660, which changed state.
Bug 979660 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Bare - Minimal XML parser
implemented via a C state engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979660
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979660
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-XML-Bare-0.53-1.fc19 |perl-XML-Bare-0.53-1.fc18
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968596
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|nodejs-detective-2.1.2-2.fc |nodejs-detective-2.1.2-2.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989132
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989265
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
dtdparser-1.21-10.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dtdparser-1.21-10.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989265
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989960
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
qtdbf-0.9.9-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qtdbf-0.9.9-3.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984846
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from gil catta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982186
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|ghc-language-javascript-0.5 |ghc-language-javascript-0.5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986608
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969830
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||nodejs-grip-0.1.5-2.fc18
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|mingw-postgresql-9.2.4-1.fc |mingw-postgresql-9.2.4-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977121
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||nodejs-findup-sync-0.1.2-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977121
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|nodejs-findup-sync-0.1.2-1. |nodejs-findup-sync-0.1.2-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982189
Bug 982189 depends on bug 982186, which changed state.
Bug 982186 Summary: Review Request: ghc-language-javascript - Parser for
JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982186
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982186
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916436
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
python-narcissus-app-0.9.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968596
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||nodejs-detective-2.1.2-2.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916436
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
python-narcissus-app-0.9.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915903
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915903
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XsTwEG79dt&a=cc_unsubscribe
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895149
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895149
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FkS5c4Cf9T&a=cc_unsubscribe
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976052
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842238
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989752
--- Comment #18 from Petr Pisar ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #16)
> What's the solution for the missing dependencies for the dlopen'ed shared
> libs? Has that changed in any way? bug 848144 comment 8
Those are week dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975309
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #32 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980937
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984360
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989960
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
qtdbf-0.9.9-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qtdbf-0.9.9-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989960
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
Ed Santiago changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||santi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Ed
1 - 100 of 233 matches
Mail list logo